Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-11

  Brewer, Bambi R ^a,b   Fagan, Matthew ^b,c   Klatzky, Roberta L ^b,d   Matsuoka, Yoky ^a,e  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback distortion; Kinesthetic perception; Perception of effort; Rehabilitation robotics

Indexed keywords

HYPOTHESIS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI); VISUAL DISTORTION;

FEEDBACK; ROBOT APPLICATIONS; VISION;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EXPERIENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FINGER; FORCE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; POSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ENVIRONMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EXERTION; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REHABILITATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 16344383512     PISSN: 15344320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.843443     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. P. S. Lum, C. G. Burgar, P. C. Shor, M. Majmundar, and M. Van der Loos, "Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab., vol. 83, pp. 952-959, 2002.
2. B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, and N. Hogan, "Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option?," Curr. Opin. Neurol., vol. 14, pp. 745-752, 2001.
3. E. Taub, "Overcoming learned nonuse: A new approach to treatment in physical medicine," in Clinical Applied Psychophysiology, J. G. Carlson, A. R. Seifert, and N. Birbaumer, Eds. New York: Plenum, 1994, pp. 185-220.
4. J. Liepert, W. H. Miltner, H. Bauder, M. Sommer, C. Dettmers, E. Taub, and C. Weiller, "Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients," Neurosci. Lett., vol. 250, pp. 5-8, 1998.
5. R.F. Boian, C. S. Lee, J.E. Deutsch, G.C. Burdea, and J. A. Lewis, "Virtual reality-based system for ankle rehabilitation post stroke," in Proc. 1st Int. Workshop Virtual Reality Rehabilitation, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002, pp. 77-86.
6. A. Bandura and D. Cervone, "Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems," J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 45, pp. 1017-1028, 1983.
7. -, "Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation," Org. Behav. Hum. Dec. Process., vol. 38, pp. 92-113, 1986.
8. J. W. Atkinson, An Introduction to Motivation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1964.
9. E. S. Elliott and C. S. Dweck, "Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement," J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 54, pp. 5-12, 1988.
10. E. R. Skidmore, "Functional assessment after stroke: Examining outcome models using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health," Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Occupational Therapy, Univ. Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
11. M. A. Heller, "Haptic dominance in form perception with blurred vision," Perception, vol. 12, pp. 607-613, 1983.
12. E. A. Fleishman, D. L. Gebhardt, and J. C. Hogan, "The measurement of effort," Ergonomics, vol. 27, pp. 947-954, 1984.
13. X. D. Pang, H. Z. Tan, and N. I. Durlach, "Manual discrimination of force using active finger motion," Percept. Psychophys., vol. 49, pp. 531-540, 1991.
14. J. E. Berliner and N. I. Durlach, "Intensity perception. IV. Resolution in roving-level discrimination," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 53, pp. 1270-1287, 1973.
15. D. J. Reinkensmeyer, L. E. Kahn, M. Averbuch, A. McKenna-Cole, B. D. Schmit, and W. Z. Rymer, "Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: Progress with the ARM guide," J. Rehab. Res. Dev., vol. 37, pp. 653-662, 2000.
16. E. E. Brodie and H. E. Ross, "Sensorimotor mechanisms in weight discrimination," Percept. Psychophys., vol. 36, pp. 477-481, 1984.
17. H. E. Ross and E. E. Brodie, "Weber fractions for weight and mass as a function of stimulus intensity," Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A, vol. 39, pp. 77-88, 1987.
18. L. A. Jones, "Matching forces: constant errors and differential thresholds," Perception, vol. 18, pp. 681-687, 1989.
19. D. V. Raj, K. Ingty, and M. S. Devanandan, "Weight appreciation in the hand in normal subjects and in patients with leprous neuropathy," Brain, pt. 1, vol. 108, pp. 95-102, 1985.
20. N. I. Durlach, H. Z. Tan, N. A. Macmillan, W. M. Rabinowitz, and L. D. Braida, "Resolution in one dimension with random variations in background dimensions," Percept. Psychophys., vol. 46, pp. 293-296, 1989.
21. H. Z. Tan, W. M. Rabinowitz, and N. I. Durlach, "Analysis of a synthetic Tadoma system as a multidimensional tactile display," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 86, pp. 981-988, 1989.
22. H. Z. Tan, N. I. Durlach, G. L. Beauregard, and M. A. Srinivasan, "Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the roles of force and work cues," Percept. Psychophys., vol. 57, pp. 495-510, 1995.
23. G. A. Gescheider, R. R. Edwards, E. A. Lackner, S. J. Bolanowski, and R. T. Verrillo, "The effects of aging on information-processing channels in the sense of touch: III. Differential sensitivity to changes in stimulus intensity," Somatosens. Mot. Res., vol. 13, pp. 73-80, 1996.
24. P. J. Fitzgibbons and S. Gordon-Salant, "Aging and temporal discrimination in auditory sequences," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 109, pp. 2955-2963, 2001.
25. K. Shinomori, B. E. Schefrin, and J. S. Werner, "Age-related changes in wavelength discrimination," J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A, Opt. Image. Sci. Vis., vol. 18, pp. 310-318, 2001.
26. S. Jaric, D. M. Corcos, G. L. Gottlieb, D. B. Ilic, and M. L. Latash, "The effects of practice on movement distance and final position reproduction: implications for the equilibrium-point control of movements," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 100, pp. 353-359, 1994.
27. N. I. Durlach, L. A. Delhorne, A. Wong, W. Y. Ko, W. M. Rabinowitz, and J. Hollerbach, "Manual discrimination and identification of length by the finger-span method," Percept. Psychophys., vol. 46, pp. 29-38, 1989.
28. M. O. Ernst and M. S. Banks, "Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion," Nature, vol. 415, pp. 429-433, 2002.
29. L. A. Jones and I. W. Hunter, "A perceptual analysis of stiffness," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 79, pp. 150-156, 1990.
30. J. R. Lackner, "Adaptation to displaced vision: role of proprioception," Percept. Mot. Skills, vol. 38, pp. 1251-1256, 1974.
31. J. C. Hogan, G. D. Ogden, D. L. Gebhardt, and E. A. Fleishman, "Reliability and validity of methods for evaluating perceived physical effort," J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 65, pp. 672-679, 1980.
32. J. G. Williams and R. S. Purewal, "Development and initial validation of the Effort Sense Rating Scale (ESRS): A self-perceived index of physical fitness," Prev. Med., vol. 32, pp. 103-108, 2001.
33. B. R. Brewer, R. Klatzky, and Y. Matsuoka, "Feedback distortion to overcome learned nonuse: A system overview," in Proc. 25th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE, vol. 2, Cancun, Mexico, 2003, pp. 1613-1616.
34. S. Allin, Y. Matsuoka, and R. Klatzky, "Measuring just noticeable differences for haptic force feedback: Implications for rehabilitation," in Proc. 10th Symp. Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Orlando, FL, 2002, pp. 299-302.
35. M. Pagan, Y. Matsuoka, and R. Klatzky, "Feedback distortion for rehabilitation: gauging perceived physical effort," in Proc. 11th Symp. Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Los Angeles, CA, 2003, pp. 159-165.
36. B. R. Brewer, R. Klatzky, and Y. Matsuoka, "Effects of visual feedback distortion for the elderly and the motor-impaired in a robotic rehabilitation environment," in Proc. Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 2, New Orleans, LA, 2004, pp. 2080-2085.
37. -, "Feedback distortion to increase strength and mobility," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Rehabilitation Robotics. Daejeon, Korea, 2003, pp. 258-261.