Challenges and opportunities for robot-mediated neurorehabilitation

Proceedings of the IEEE

Volumn 94, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1717-1726

  Harwin, William S ^a,b   Patton, James L ^a,c   Edgerton, V Reggie ^a,d  

^a IEEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^c REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Haptic interfaces; Neurological injury; Neurorehabilitation; Rehabilitation; Robot; Spinal cord injury; Stroke; Traumatic brain injury; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HAPTIC INTERFACES; NEUROLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; ROBOT APPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

NEUROLOGICAL INJURY; NEUROREHABILITATION; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

EID: 33947373457     PISSN: 00189219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2006.880671     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. W. Harwin, T. Rahman, and R. Foulds, "A review of design issues in rehabilitation robotics with reference to North American research," IEEE J. Rehab. Eng., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3-13, Mar. 1995.
2. R. Erlandson, "Applications of robotic/mechatronic systems in special education, rehabilitation therapy, and vocational training: A paradigm shift," IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 22-34, Mar. 1995.
3. N. Hogan, H. Krebs, J. Charnnarong, P. Srikrishna, and A. Sharon, "MIT - MANUS A workstation for manual therapy and training II," in Proc. SPIE Conf. Telemanipulator Technol., 1992, pp. 28-34.
4. C. D. A. Wolfe, A. G. Rudd, R. Howard, C. Coshall, J. Stewart, E. Lawrence, C. Hajat, and T. Hillen. (2002). Incidence and case fatality rates of stroke subtypes in a multiethnic population: The south London stroke register. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. [Online]. 72, pp. 211-216. Available: jnnp.bmjjournals.com
5. P. Thorvaldsen, K. Asplund, K. Kuulasmaa, A.-M. Rajakangas, and M. Schroll. (1995). Stroke incidence, case fatality, and mortality in the WHOMONICA project. Stroke. [Online]. 26(3), pp. 361-367. Available: http://stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/3/361
6. J. A. Stewart, R. Dundas, R. S. Howard, A. G. Rudd, and C. D. A. Wolfe. (1999). Ethnic differences in incidence of stroke: Prospective study with stroke register. BMJ. [Online]. 318(7189), pp. 967-971. Available: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/318/7189/967
7. Merck Res. Lab. (1997). Merck Manual Geriatrics, Whithouse Sation, NJ. [Online]. Available: http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmg/home.jsp
8. Stroke Association, Stroke Statistics Fact Sheet. (2006, Apr.). [Online]. Available: http://www.stroke.org.uk/
9. A. Goldstein and B. Damon. (1993, Sep.). We the American Elderly. U.S. Census Bureau. [Online]. Available: http://www.census.gov/apsd/wepeople/we- 9.pdf
10. P. Sandercock, E. Berge, M. Dennis, J. Forbes, P. Hand, J. Kwan et al., A systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and barriers to implementation of thrombolytic and neuroprotective therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in the NHS. Health Technol. Assess. 2002. vol. 6, no. 26.
11. W. K. Timoszyk, R. D. de Leon, N. London, R. Joynes, K. Minakata, R. R. Roy, V. R. Edgerton, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer. (2004). Comparison of virtual and physical treadmill environments for training stepping after spinal cord injury. Robotica. [Online]. 21(1), pp. 25-32. Available: http://titles.cambridge. org/journals/
12. N. Nishitani and R. Hari. (2000). Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. PNAS. [Online]. 97(2), pp. 913-918. Available: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/97/2/913
13. R. C. Miall and D. M. Wolpert, "Forward models for physiological motor control," Neural Netw., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1265-1279, 1996.
14. T. Kujala, K. Alho, and R. Naatanen, "Cross-modal reorganization of human cortical functions," Trends Neurosci., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 115-120, 2000.
15. J. Eyre, "Understanding brain damage and neurological recovery," in Restoring Neurological Function: Putting the Neurosciences to Work in Neurorehabilitation. Washington, DC: Acad. Med. Sci., Mar. 2004, ch. D, pp. 35-38, No. 1-03401-0. [Online]. Available: http://www.acmedsci.ac. uk/p_neurofunc.pdf
16. D. Bavelier and H. Neville, "Cross-modal plasticity: Where and how?" Nature Rev. Neurosci., vol. 3, pp. 443-452, 2000.
17. W. Penfield and T. Rasmussen, The Cerebral Cortex of Man. A Clinical Study of Localisation of Function. New York: Macmillan, 1950.
18. B. B. Johansson. (2000). Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation: The Willis lecture. Stroke. [Online]. 31(1), pp. 223-230. Available: http://stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/31/1/223
19. S. Dunnett, "Neuroprotection and plasticity," in Restoring Neurological Function: Putting the Neurosciences to Work in Neurorehabilitation. Washington, DC: Acad. Med. Sci., Mar. 2004, ch. I, pp. 47-50, 1-03401-07-0. [Online]. Available: http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk/p\
20. C. Warlow, C. Sudlow, M. Dennis, J. Wardlaw, and P. Sandercock, "Stroke" Lancet, vol. 362, pp. 1211-1224, 2003.
21. S. E. Fasoli, H. I. Krebs, J. Stein, W. R. Frontera, R. Hughes, and N. Hogan, "Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results," Archives Physical Medicine Rehab., vol. 85, pp. 1106-1111, 2004.
22. C. Burgar, P. Lum, P. Shor, and H. Vander Loos, "Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience," J. Rehab. Res. Development, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 663-673, 2000.
23. M. Johnson, H. V. der Loos, C. Burgar, P. Shor, and L. Leifer, "Design and evaluation of driver's seat: A car steering simulation environment for upper limb stroke therapy," Robotica, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13-23, Jan. 2003.
24. D. Reinkensmeyer, B. Schmit, and W. Rymer, "Mechatronic assessment of arm impariment after chronic brain injury," in Biomechatronics. Twente: Univ. Twente Inst. Biomed. Technol., 1999, pp. 61-65.
25. R. Loureiro, F. Amirabdollahian, M. Topping, B. Driessen, and W. Harwin, "Upperlimb mediated stroke therapy - GENTLE/s approach," Special Issue on Rehabilitation Robotics, J. Autonomous Robots, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 35-51, Jul. 2003. New York: Kluwer Academic.
26. F. Amirabdollahian, R. Loureiro, and W. Harwin, "Minimum jerk trajectory control for rehabilitation and haptic applications," in Proc. 2002 IEEE Int.Conf. Robotics Automation, Washington, DC, May 2002, pp. 3380-3385. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/7916/21828/ 01014233.pdf
27. J. Liu, J. Emken, S. Cramer, and D. Reinkensmeyer, "Learning to perform a novel movement pattern using haptic guidance: Slow learning, rapid forgetting, and attractor paths," in Proc. IEEE 9th Int. Conf. Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005, pp. 37-40.
28. S. Hesse, C. Bertelt, M. T. Jahnke, A. Schaffrin, P. Baake, M. Malezic, and K. H. Mauritz, "Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients," Stroke, vol. 26, pp. 976-981, Jun. 1995.
29. M. Visintin, H. Barbeau, N. Korner-Bitensky, and N. E. Mayo. (1998). A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke, pp. 1122-1128. [Online]. Available: http://stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/29/6/1122
30. J. A. Galvez, G. Kerdanyan, S. Maneekobkunwong, R. Weber, M. Scott, S. J. Harkema, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, "Measuring human trainers skill for the design of better robot control algorithms for gait training after spinal cord injury," in Proc. IEEE 9th Int. Conf. Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005, pp. 231-234.
31. G. Colombo, R. Schreier, A. Mayr, H. Plewa, and R. Rupp, "Novel tilt table with integrated robotic stepping mechanism: Design principles and clinical application," in Proc. IEEE 9th Int. Conf. Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005, pp. 227-230.
32. J. Galvez and D. Reinkensmeyer, "Robotics for gait training after spinal cord injury," Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehab., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 18-33, 2005.
33. L. Cai, A. Fong, C. Otoshi, Y. Liang, J. Cham, H. Zhong, R. Roy, V. Edgerton, and J. Burdick, "Effects of consistency versus variability in robotically controlled training of stepping in adult spinal mice," in Proc. IEEE 9th Int. Conf. Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005, pp. 575-579.
34. M. A. Srinivasan and R. H. La Motte, "Tactual discrimination of softness," J Neurophysiol., vol. 73, pp. 88-101, 1995.
35. B. Brewer, R. Klatzky, and Y. Matsuoka, "Feedback distortion to increase strength and mobility," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR 2003), KAIST, Korea, Apr. 2003, pp. 258-261.
36. Y. Rossetti, G. Rode et al., "Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect," Nature, vol. 395, no. 6698, pp. 166-169, 1998.
37. J. L. Patton, M. E. Phillips-Stoykov et al., "Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors," Experimental Brain Res., 2005.
38. J. L. Emken and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, "Robot-enhanced motor learning: Accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 33-39, Mar. 2005.
39. B. Brewer, M. Fagan, R. Klatzky, and Y. Matsuoka, "Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-11, Mar. 2005.
40. J. R. Flanagan and A. K. Rao, "Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: Evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space," J. Neurophysiol., vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 2174-2178, 1995.
41. G. Robles-De-La-Torre and V. Hayward, "Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch," Nature, vol. 412, pp. 445-448, 2001.
42. B. Brewer, R. Klatzky, and Y. Matsuoka, "Effects of visual feedback distortion for the elderly and the motor-impaired in a robotic rehabilitation environment," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automation (ICRA), 2004, pp. 2080-2085.
43. K. P. Kording and D. M. Wolpert, "Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning," Nature, vol. 427, no. 6971, pp. 244-247, 2004.
44. J. L. Patton and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi, "Robot-assisted adaptive training: Custom force fields for teaching movement patterns," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 636-646, Apr. 2004.
45. C. J. Winstein, A. S. Merians et al., "Motor learning after unilateral brain damage," Neuropsychologia, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 975-987, 1999.
46. K. P. Kording and D. M. Wolpert, "The loss function of sensorimotor learning," in Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 101, no. 26, 2004, pp. 9839-9842.
47. Y. Wei, P. Bajaj, and R. P. J. Scheidt, "A real-time haptic/graphic demonstration of how error augmentation can enhance learning," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automation (ICRA). 2005.
48. P. Duncan, M. Propst, and S. Nelson, "Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident," Physical Therapy, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1606-1610, 1983.
49. M. Campbell, R. Fitzpatrick, A. Haines, A. L. Kinmonth, P. Sandercock, D. Spiegelhalter, and P. Tyrer. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. [Online]. 321(7262), pp. 694-696. Available: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com
50. M. Arbib, Ed. Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
51. S. Goodbody and D. Wolpert, "Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning," J. Neurophysiol., vol. 79, pp. 1825-1838, 1998.
52. F. Amirabdollahian, "An investigation of robot-mediate therapies and therapy effects on the recovery of upper limb post-stroke," Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Reading, Reading, U.K., Sep. 2003.
53. R. Kearney, R. Stein, and L. Parameswaran, "Identification of intrinsic and reflex contributions to human ankle stiffness dynamics," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 493-504, Jun. 1997.
54. M. Mirbagheri, C. Tsao, E. Pelosin, and W. Rymer, "Therapeutic effects of robotic-assisted locomotor training on neuromuscular properties," in Proc. IEEE 9th Int. Conf. Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005, pp. 561-564.
55. E. Taub, G. Uswatte et al., "Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - A clinical review," J. Rehab. Res. Development, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 237-251, 1999.
56. T. Kanade and J. Osborn. (2004, May). Report of the NSF/International Advanced Robotics Program (IARP) workshop on medical robotics. Nat. Sci. Found., Hidden Valley, PA. [Online]. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/eng/roboticsorg/ IARPMedicalRobotics-WorkshopReport.htm
57. A. Wing and W. Harwin, "Rehabilitation engineering," in Restoring Neurological Function: Putting the Neurosciences to Work in Neurorehabilitation. Washington, DC: Acad. Medical Sciences, Mar. 2004, ch. M, pp. 58-59, No. 1-903401-07-0. [Online]. Available: http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk/ p_neurofunc.pdf