Authorial voice in academic writing: A methodological proposal for its analysis;La voz del autor en la escritura académica: Una propuesta para su análisis

Revista Signos

Volumn 44, Issue 76, 2011, Pages 105-117

  Castelló, Montserrat ^a   Corcelles, Mariona ^a   Iñesta, Anna ^a   Bañales, Gerardo ^b   Vega, Norma ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT RAMON LLULL   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE TAMAULIPAS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Academic voice; Academic writing; Authorial identity; Intertextuality; Stance

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054893845     PISSN: 00350451     EISSN: 07180934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0718-09342011000200001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bakthin, M.M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, Tx: University of Texas Press.
2. Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextuality: How texts rely on other text. En C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it. An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 83-96). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Cadman, K. (1997). Thesis writing for international students: A question of identity? English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 177-188.
4. Calsamiglia, E. & Tusón, A. (2007). Las cosas del decir. Manual de análisis del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.
5. Castelló, M., Iñesta, A., Miras, M., Solé, I., Teberosky, A. & Zannoto, M. (2007). Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. Conocimientos y estrategias. Barcelona: Grao.
6. Corcelles, M. (2010). Construir la veu filosófica mitjançant l'escriptura col.laborativa: Una comunitat d'aprenentatge de la filosofia al batxillerat [en línea]. Disponible en: http://www.tesisenred.net/TESIS_URL/AVAILABLE/TDX-0923110-124327/Tesi_Doctoral_Mariona_Corcelles_13_Set_2010.pdf
7. Davies, B. & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43-63.
8. Donahue, C. (2005). Student writing as negotiation. En T. Kostouli (Ed.), Writing in context(s) textual practices and learning processes in sociocultural settings (pp. 137-164). New York: Springer.
9. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Londres: Longman.
10. Farmer, F. (1995). Voice reprised: Three studies for a dialogic understanding. Rhetoric Review, 13(2), 304-320.
11. Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99-125.
12. Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
13. Gee, J. P. (2006). A sociocultural perspective on early literacy development. En S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 30-42). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341-367.
16. Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader. Addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication, 18(4), 549-574.
17. Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112.
18. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.
19. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Ivanic, R. (2005). The discoursal construction of writer identity. En R. Beach, J. Green, M. Kamil & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 391-416). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
21. Ivanic, R. & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 3-33.
22. Kamberelis, G. & Scott, K. D. (1982). Other people's voices: The coarticulation of texts and subjectivities. Linguistics and Education, 4, 359-403.
23. Lensmire, T. J. (1998). Rewriting student voice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(3), 261-291.
24. Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. En S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp. 142-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Nelson, N. (2001). Writing to learn: One theory, two rationales. En P. Tynjala, L. Mason & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 23-36). Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Nelson, N. & Castelló, M. (en prensa). Academic writing and authorial voice. En M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societes. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
27. Prior, P. (1998). A sociohistorical account of literate activity in the academy. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Prior, P. (2001). Voices in text, mind, and society. Sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisition and use. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 55-81.
29. Reuter, Y. & Lahanier-Reuter, D. (2007). Analyzing writing in academic disciplines: A few concepts. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(2), 47-57.
30. Spivey, N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing and the making of meaning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Swales, J. (2004). Research genres. Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Thompson, J. P. & Tribble, C. (2001). Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for Academic Purposes. Language, Learning & Techonology, 5(3), 91-105.
34. White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89-116.