Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles

Written Communication

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 549-574

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344842205     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088301018004005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds., V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
5. Bloor, T. (1996). Three hypothetical strategies in philosophical writing. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issue (pp. 19-43). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
6. Bondi, M. (1999). English across genres: Language variation in the discourse of economics. Modena, Italy: Edizioni II Fiorino.
7. Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
8. Cohen, M., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th Ed.). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
9. Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang.
10. Faber, B. (1996). Rhetoric in competition: The formation of organizational discourse in Conference on College Composition and Communication abstracts. Written Communication, 13, 355-384.
11. Gosden, H. (1993). Discourse functions of subject in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 14, 56-75.
12. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
13. Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Hyland, K. (1998a). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
15. Hyland, K. (1998b). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-455.
16. Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes, and practices (pp. 99-121). London: Longman.
17. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
18. Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 207-226.
19. Hyland, K. (submitted for publication). Directives: Power and engagement in academic writing.
20. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
21. Kirsch, G., & Roen, D. (Eds.). (1990). A sense of audience in written communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. MacDonald, S. P. (1994). Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
23. Milton, J. (1999). Lexical thickets and electronic gateways: Making texts accessible by novice writers. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes, and practices (pp. 221-243). London: Longman.
24. Myers, G. (1991). Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science texts. Discourse Processes, 14, 1-26.
25. Palmer, F. (1990). Modality and the English modals (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
26. Park, D. (1986). Analyzing audiences. College Composition and Communication, 37, 478-488.
27. Pennycook, A. (1994). The politics of pronouns. ELT Journal, 48, 173-178.
28. Selzer, J. (1992) More meanings of audience. In S. Witte, N. Nakadate, &. R. Cherry (Eds.), A rhetoric of doing (pp. 161-177). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
29. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Swales, J., Ahmad, U., Chang, Y. -Y., Chavez , D., Dressen, D., & Seymour, R. (1998). Consider this: The role of imperatives in scholarly writing. Applied Linguistics, 19, 97-121.
31. Swales, J., & Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
32. Thetela, P. (1997). Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 101-118.
33. Webber, P. (1994). The function of questions in different medical English genres. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 257-268.