Still More "fancy" and "myth" than "fact" in Students' Conceptions of Evolution

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 505-517

  Cunningham, Deborah L ^a   Wescott, Daniel J ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological anthropology; Conceptual change; Evolution; Misconceptions; Pedagogy; Survey data; Undergraduate education

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054776820     PISSN: 19366426     EISSN: 19366434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12052-009-0123-6     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alberts B. Forward. In: Committee on Undergraduate Science Education, editor. Science teaching reconsidered: a handbook (p. v), Washington, DC: National Academy; 1997.
2. Almquist AJ, Cronin JE. Fact, fancy, and myth on human evolution. Curr Anthropol. 1988;29:520-2. doi: 10.1086/203672.
3. Alters BJ, Nelson CE. Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution Int J Org Evolution. 2002;56:1891-901.
4. Anderson DL, Fisher KM, Norman GJ. Development and evaluation of the conceptual issue of natural selection. J Res Sci Teach. 2002;39:952-78. doi: 10.1002/tea.10053.
5. Berman M. Intelligent design creationism: a threat to society - not just biology. Am Biol Teach. 2003;65:641-8. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2003)065[0646:IDCATT]2.0.CO;2.
6. Bishop BA, Anderson CW. Evolution by natural selection: a teaching module. East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University; 1986.
7. Bishop BA, Anderson CW. Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27:415-27. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660270503.
8. Brumby MN. Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Sci Educ. 1984;68:493-503. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730680412.
9. Committee on Undergraduate Science Education. Science teaching reconsidered: a handbook. Washington, DC: National Academy; 1997.
10. Coyne J. The faith that dare not speak its name: the case against intelligent design. The New Republic. 2005;21-33.
11. Firenze R. Lamarck vs. Darwin: dueling theories. Rep Natl Cent Sci Educ. 1997;17(4):9-11.
12. Greene ED Jr. The logic of university students' misunderstanding of natural selection. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27:875-85. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660270907.
13. Hellden GF, Solomon J. The persistence of personal and social themes in context: long- and short-term studies of students' scientific ideas. Sci Educ. 2004;88:885-900. doi: 10.1002/sce.20003.
14. Holden C. ID goes on trial this month in Pennsylvania school case. Science 2005;309:1796. doi: 10.1126/science.309.5742.1796.
15. Ingram EL, Nelson CE. Relationship between achievement and students' acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. J Res Sci Teach. 2006;43:7-24. doi: 10.1002/tea.20093.
16. Jensen MS, Finley FN. Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Sci Educ. 1995;79:147-66. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730790203.
17. Jensen MS, Finley FN. Changes in students' understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. J Res Sci Teach. 1996;33:879-900. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<879::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-T.
18. Jurmain R, Kilgore L, Travathan W. Introduction to physical anthropology. 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2005.
19. Lawson AE. Research on the acquisition of science knowledge: epistemological foundation of cognition. In: Gabel DI, editor. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan; 1994. p. 131-76.
20. Lawson AE, Alkhoury S, Benford R, Clark BR, Falconer KA. What kinds of scientific concepts exist? Concept construction and intellectual development in college biology. J Res Sci Teach. 2000;37:996-1018. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<996::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-J.
21. Lederman NG, Abd-El-Khalick F, Bell RL, Schwartz RS. Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learner's conceptions of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach. 2002;39:497-521. doi: 10.1002/tea.10034.
22. Linhart YB. The teaching of evolution: we need to do better. Bioscience 1997;47:385-91. doi: 10.2307/1313153.
23. Liu X. Using concept mapping for assessing and promoting relational conceptual change in science. Sci Educ. 2004;88:373-96. doi: 10.1002/sce.10127.
24. Losh SC, Travani CM, Njoroge R, Wilke R, Mcauley M. What does education really do? Educational dimensions and pseudoscience support in American general public, 1979-2001. Skeptic Inquirer. 2003;27:30-6.
25. Matzke NJ. Design on trial in Dover, Pennsylvania. Rep Natl Cent Sci Educ. 2004;24(5):4-9.
26. Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH, Novak JD. Assessing science understanding: a human constructivist view. San Diego: Academic; 2000.
27. Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH, Novak JD. Assessing understanding in biology. J Biol Educ. 2001;35:118-24.
28. Modell H, Michael J, Wenderoth MP. Helping the learner to learn: the role of uncovering misconceptions. Am Biol Teach. 2005;67:20-6. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2005)067[0020:HTLTLT]2.0.CO;2.
29. Morrison JA, Lederman NG. Science teachers' diagnosis and understanding of students' perceptions. Sci Educ. 2003;87:849-67. doi: 10.1002/sce.10092.
30. Nehm RH, Schonfeld IS. Measuring knowledge of natural selection: a comparison of the CINS, and open-response instrument, and an oral interview. J Res Sci Teach. 2008;45:1131-60. doi: 10.1002/tea.20251.
31. Newport F. Third of Americans say evidence has supported Darwin's evolution theory. Gallup Poll News Service 2004.
32. Nunnaly JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
33. Palmer DH. Exploring the link between students' scientific and nonscientific conceptions. Sci Educ. 1999;83:639-53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<639::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-O.
34. Posner G, Strike K, Hewson P, Gertzog WA. Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Sci Educ. 1982;66:211-27. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207.
35. Rutledge ML, Sadler KC. Reliability of the Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE) instrument with university students. Am Biol Teach. 2007;69:332-5. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[332:ROTMOA]2.0.CO;2.
36. Rutledge ML, Warden MA. The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. Sch Sci Math. 1999;90:91-100.
37. SAS Institute Inc. SAS 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2002.
38. Scott EC, Branch G. Antievolutionism: changes and continuities. Bioscience 2003;53:282-5. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0282:ACAC]2.0.CO;2.
39. Shipman P. Being stalked by intelligent design. Am Sci. 2005;93:500-2.
40. Sinatra GA, Southerland SA, McConaughy F, Demastes JW. Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 2003;40:510-28. doi: 10.1002/tea.10087.
41. Trowbridge JE, Wandersee JH. Identifying critical junctures in learning in a college course on evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31:459-73.
42. Udovic D, Morris D, Dickman A, Postlethwait J, Wetherwax P. Workshop biology: demonstrating the effectiveness of active learning in an introductory biology course. Bioscience 2002;52:272-81. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0272:WBDTEO]2.0.CO;2.
43. Vosniadou S, Brewer W. Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognit Psychol. 1992;24:535-85. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W.
44. Wandersee JH, Mintzes JJ, Arnaudin MW. Biology from the learner's viewpoint: a content analysis of the research literature. Sch Sci Math. 1989;89:654-68.
45. Wescott DJ, Cunningham DL. Recognizing student misconceptions about science and evolution. MountainRise 2005;2(2): http://facctr.wcu.edu/mountainrise/archive/vol2no2/html/science-evolution.html.
46. Wilson JA. Pseudoscientific beliefs among college students. Rep Natl Cent Sci Educ. 2001;21(1-2):9-13.