How good are your counterfactuals? Assessing quantitative macro-comparative welfare state research with qualitative criteria

Journal of European Social Policy

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 365-380

  Emmenegger, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

causality; counterfactuals; quantitative social research; welfare chauvinism; welfare state

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; WELFARE PROVISION;

EID: 80054683098     PISSN: 09589287     EISSN: 14617269     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0958928711412222     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Achen, C.H. (2002) Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and Art, Annual Review of Political Science 5: 423-50.
2. Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E.L. (2004) Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Alesina, A., Glaeser, E.L. and Sacerdote, B. (2001) Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2001(2): 187-254.
4. Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S. and Wacziarg, R. (2003) Fractionalization, Journal of Economic Growth 8(2): 155-94.
5. Armingeon, K., Gerber, M., Leimgruber, P. and Beyeler, M. (2008) Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2006. Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
6. Bergh, A. (2005) On the Counterfactual Problem of Welfare State Research: How Can We Measure Redistribution?, European Sociological Review 21(4): 345-57.
7. Brady, H.E. (2004) Doing Good and Doing Better: How Far Does the Quantitative Template Get Us?, in H.E. Brady and D. Collier (eds) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, pp. 53-67. Lanham/ Boulder/New York/Toronto/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
8. Brady, H.E. (2008) Causation and Explanation in Social Science, in J.M. Box-Steffensmeier, H.E. Brady and D. Collier (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, pp. 217-70. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Brady, H.E. and Collier, D. (eds) (2004) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham/ Boulder/New York/Toronto/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
10. Clarke, K.A. (2005) The Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Econometric Research, Conflict Management and Peace Science 22(4): 341-52.
11. Collier, D., Seawright, J. and Munck, G.L. (2004) The Quest for Standards: King, Keohane, and Verba's Designing Social Inquiry, in H.E. Brady and D. Collier (eds) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, pp. 21-50). Lanham/Boulder/New York/ Toronto/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
12. Czada, R. (1998) Vereinigungskrise Und Standortdebatte: Der Beitrag Der Wiedervereinigung Zur Krise Des Westdeutschen Modells, Leviathan 26(1): 24-59.
13. Dunning, T. (2007) Improving Causal Inference: Strengths and Limitations of Natural Experiments, Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 282-93.
14. Ebbinghaus, B. (2005) When Less Is More: Selection Problems in Large-N and Small-N Cross-National Comparisons, International Sociology 20(2): 133-52.
15. Elster, J. (1978) Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds. Chichester/New York/Brisbane/Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Emmenegger, P. (2010) The Long Road to Flexicurity: The Development of Job Security Regulations in Denmark and Sweden, Scandinavian Political Studies 33(3): 271-94.
17. Emmenegger, P. and Careja, R. (2011) From Dilemma to Dualization: Social and Migration Policies in the 'Reluctant Countries of Immigration, in P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier and M. Seeleib-Kaiser (eds) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Fearon, J.D. (1991) Counterfactuals and Hypotheses Testing in Political Science, World Politics 43(2): 169-95.
19. Fearon, J.D. (1996) Causes and Counterfactuals in Social Science: Exploring an Analogy between Cellar Automata and Historical Processes, in P.E. Tetlock and A. Belkin (eds) Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives, pp. 39-67. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Fogel, R. (1964) Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Baltimore MD: John Hopkins University Press.
21. Freedman, D.A. (2010) Statistical Models and Shoe Leather, in D. Collier, J.S. Sekhon and P.B. Stark (eds) Statistical Models and Causal Inference: A Dialogue with the Social Sciences, pp. 45-62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Goerres, A. and Prinzen, K. (2011) Using Mixed Methods for the Analysis of Individuals: A Review of Necessary and Sufficient Conditions and an Application to Welfare State Attitudes, Quantity and Quality DOI 10.1007/ s11135-010-9379-8.
23. Goertz, G. and Levy, J.S. (2007) Causal Explanation, Necessary Conditions, and Case Studies, in G. Goertz and J.S. Levy (eds) Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals, pp. 9-45. London/New York: Routledge.
24. Goldthorpe, J. (2000) Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology, in J. Goldthorpe (ed.) On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory, pp. 45-64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Holland, P.W. (1986) Statistics and Causal Inference, Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(396): 945-60.
26. Huber, E. and Stephens, J.D. (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago IL/London: University of Chicago Press.
27. King, G. and Zeng, L. (2006) The Danger of Extreme Counterfactuals, Political Analysis 14(2): 131-59.
28. King, G.and Zeng, L. (2007) When Can History Be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference, International Studies Quarterly 51(1): 183-210.
29. King, G., Keohane, R.O. and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
30. Lebow, R.N. (2000) What's So Different About a Counterfactual, World Politics 52(4): 550-85.
31. Lebow, R.N. (2010) Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton NJ/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
32. Levy, J.S. (2008) Counterfactuals and Case Studies, in J.M. Box-Steffensmeier, H.E. Brady and D. Collier (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, pp. 627-44. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Lieberman, E.S. (2005) Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research, American Political Science Review 99(3): 435-52.
34. Lieberson, S. (1985) Making it Count: The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35. Lieberson, S. and Hansen, L.K. (1974) National Development, Mother Tongue Diversity, and the Comparative Study of Nations, American Sociological Review 39(4): 523-41.
36. Morissens, A. and Sainsbury, D. (2005) Migrants' Social Rights, Ethnicity and Welfare Regimes, Journal of Social Policy 34(4): 637-60.
37. Nelson, K. (2007) Universalism Versus Targeting: The Vulnerability of Social Insurance and Means-Tested Minimum Income Protection in 18 Countries, 1990- 2002, International Social Security Review 60(1): 33-58.
38. Nelson, K. (2007) The Social Assistance and Minimum Income Protection Interim Dataset. Version 2.4 Beta. Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University. URL: http://www.2.sofi.su.se/~kne/ (accessed 8 July 2010).
39. Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2003) The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
40. Pierson, P. (2001) Post-Industrial Pressures on the Mature Welfare States, in P. Pierson (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State, pp. 80-104. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Przeworski, A. (2007) Adam Przeworski: Capitalism, Democracy, and Science, in G.L. Munck and R. Snyder (eds) Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics, pp. 456-503. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
42. Ragin, C.C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
43. Ragin, C.C. (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
44. Rodden, J. (2009) Back to the Future: Endogenous Institutions and Comparative Politics, in M.I. Lichbach and A.S. Zuckerman (eds) Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, 2nd edition, pp. 333-57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Rubin, D.B. (1978) Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization, Annals of Statistics 6(1): 34-58.
46. Shalev, M. (2007) Limits and Alternatives to Multiple Regression in Comparative Research, Comparative Social Research 24: 261-308.
47. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2005) Is the Future American? Or, Can Left Politics Preserve European Welfare States from Erosion through Growing 'Racial' Diversity?, Journal of Social Policy 34(4): 661-72.
48. Tetlock, P.E. and Belkin, A. (1996) Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives, in P.E. Tetlock and A. Belkin (eds) Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives, pp. 3-38. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Tetlock, P.E. and Lebow, R.N. (2001) Poking Counterfactual Holes in Covering Laws: Cognitive Styles and Historical Reasoning, American Political Science Review 95(4): 829-43.
50. Tilly, C. (1975) Reflections on the History of European-State Making, in C. Tilly (ed.) The Formation of National States in Western Europe, pp. 3-83. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Weber, M. (1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe IL: Free Press.
52. Weber, S. (1996) Counterfactuals, Past and Future, in P.E. Tetlock and A. Belkin (eds) Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives, pp. 268-88. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.