Learning to design collaboratively: Participation of student designers in a Community of Innovation

Instructional Science

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 821-841

  West, Richard E ^a   Hannafin, Michael J ^b  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Collaborative work; Communities of Innovation; Communities of Practice; Creativity; Innovation; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054021191     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-010-9156-z     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
2. Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1996). The Team Climate Inventory: Development of the TCI and its applications in teambuilding for innovativeness. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 53.
3. Author. (2007). A Framework for defining and researching the boundaries of learning communities. Paper presented at the 2007 Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology in Anaheim, CA.
4. Author. (2009). Article published in Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 57(3), 315-332.
5. Baek, E.-O., Cagiltay, K., Boling, E., & Frick, T. (2008). User-centered design and development. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. van Merrienboer, & M. F. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 659-670). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Banahan, E., & Playfoot, J. (2004). Socio-organisational challenges in the creative economy. In L. M. Camarinha-Matos & H. Afsarmanesh (Eds.), Collaborative networked organizations: A research agenda for emerging business models. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability and talent in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165-182.
8. Barrett, F. J. (1998). Coda: Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organization Science, 9(5), 605-622.
9. Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 169-175. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8691. 00337. x.
10. Benton, S., & Giovagnoli, M. (2006). The wisdom network: An 8-step process for identifying, sharing, and leveraging individual expertise. New York: American Management Association.
11. Bielaczyc, K., Collins, A., O'Donnell, A. M., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Erkens, G. (2006). Fostering knowledge-creating communities. In A. M. O'Donnell (Ed.), Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology (pp. 37-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situation cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
13. Butterfield, L. D., Borgen, W. A., Amundson, N. E., & Maglio, A. T. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 475-497.
14. Carmeli, A., Cohen-Meitar, R., & Elizur, D. (2007). The role of job challenge and organizational identification in enhancing creative behavior among employees in the workplace. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(2), 75-90.
15. Charmaz, K. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 675-694). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Chell, E. (1998). Critical incident technique. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17. Coakes, E., & Smith, P. (2007). Developing communities of innovation by identifying innovation champions. Learning Organization, 14(1), 74-85.
18. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychology and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Csikszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
21. Csikszentmihályi, M. C. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-338). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Dahlander, L., & Wallin, M. W. (2006). A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Research Policy, 35(8), 1243-1259. doi: 10. 1016/j. respol. 2006. 09. 011.
23. Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Fixson, S. K. (2009). Teaching innovation through interdisciplinary courses and programmes in product design and development: An analysis at 16 US schools. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(3), 199-208. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8691. 2009. 00523. x.
26. Flanagan, J. C. (1952). The critical incident technique in the study of individuals. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
27. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
28. Greeno, J. G. (1997). Response: On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5-17.
29. Gremler, D. D. (2004). The critical incident technique in service research. Journal of Service Research, 7(1), 65-89.
30. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
31. Hargadon, A. (2003). How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. New York, NY: Harvard Business Press.
32. Himanen, P. (2001). The hacker ethic: A radical approach to the philosophy of business. New York: Random House.
33. Justesen, S. (2004). Innoversity in communities of practice. In P. M. Hildreth & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice (pp. 79-95). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
34. Kain, D. L. (2004). Owning significance: The critical incident technique in research. In K. B. deMarrais & S. D. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (pp. 69-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Kapur, M. (2006). Productive failure. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences, June 27-July 01 (pp. 307-313). Bloomington, IN.
36. Kim, K.-H. (2007). The two Torrance creativity tests: The Torrance tests of creative thinking and thinking creatively in action and movement. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp. 117-142). Toh Tuck Link, Singapore: World Scientific.
37. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 137-161). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Kurtzberg, T. (2005). Feeling creative, being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 51-65.
39. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Lewis, M., & Moultrie, J. (2005). The organizational innovation laboratory. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(1), 73-83. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8691. 2005. 00327. x.
41. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Moore, J. L., & Rocklin, T. R. (1998). The distribution of distributed cognition: Multiple interpretations and uses. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 97-113.
44. Mostert, N. M. (2007). Diversity of the mind as the key to successful creativity at unilever. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1), 93-100. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8691. 2007. 00422. x.
45. Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2), 107. doi: 10. 1207/S15326934CRJ152& 3_01.
46. Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2002). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
47. Ogunleye, J. (2006). A review and analysis of assessment objectives of academic and vocational qualifications in English further education, with particular reference to creativity. Journal of Education & Work, 19(1), 95-104.
48. Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. Raymond, E. S. (2003). The art of Unix programming. Retrieved March 21, 2008, from http://www. faqs. org/docs/artu/ch01s09. html.
51. Rogers, C. R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 11(4), 249-319.
52. Runco, M. A. (1993). Divergent thinking, creativity, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 16-22. doi: 10. 1177/001698629303700103.
53. Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. Sawyer, R. K. (2008). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books Group.
55. Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81-92.
56. Schrage, M. (2000). Serious play: How the world's best companies simulate to innovate. New York, NY: Harvard Business School Press.
57. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed., p. 162). New York: Teachers College Press.
58. Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). Cognitive processes in creative contexts. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 1-5). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60. Thomke, S. H. (2001). The impact of technology on knowledge creation. In I. Nonaka & T. Nishiguchi (Eds.), Knowledge emergence: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Turvey, K. (2006). Towards deeper learning through creativity within online communities in primary education. Computers & Education, 46(3), 309-321. doi: 10. 1016/j. compedu. 2005. 11. 004.
62. Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189-212). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65. Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000, January-February). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 139-145.