FISH-BOL and seafood identification: Geographically dispersed case studies reveal systemic market substitution across Canada

Mitochondrial DNA

Volumn 22, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 106-122

  Hanner, Robert ^a   Becker, Sven ^a   Ivanova, Natalia V ^a   Steinke, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Barcode of Life Data Systems; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I; DNA barcoding; Market substitution; Seafood mislabeling

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CANADA; CATERING SERVICE; CONSUMER; DNA BARCODING; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MARKET; NONHUMAN; ORGANIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; SEA FOOD; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION;

ANIMALS; CANADA; COMMERCE; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; FISHES; FOOD LABELING; FOOD SUPPLY; GENE LIBRARY; GENES, MITOCHONDRIAL; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEAFOOD; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

PISCES;

EID: 80054001297     PISSN: 19401736     EISSN: 19401744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/19401736.2011.588217     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barbuto M, Galimberti A, Ferri E, Labra M, Malandra R, Galli P, Casiraghi M. 2010. DNA barcoding reveals fraudulent substitutions in shark seafood products: The Italian case of "palombo" (Mustelus spp.). Food Res Int 43:376-381.
2. Baxter JS, Taylor EB, Devlin RH, Hagen J, McPhail JD. 1997. Evidence for natural hybridization between Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) and Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in a northcentral British Columbia watershed. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:421-429.
3. Becker S, Hanner R, Steinke D. 2011. Five years FISH-BOL: Brief status report. Mitochondrial DNA 22(Suppl 1):3-9.
4. Caddy J, Garibaldi L. 2000. Apparent changes in the trophic composition of wild marine harvest: The perspective from FAO capture database. Ocean Coast Manag 43:615-655.
5. Chow S, Kishino H. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships between tuna species of the genus Thunnus (Scombridae: Teleostei): Inconsistent implications from morphology, nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. J Mol Evol 41:741-748. (Pubitemid 26020052)
6. Cohen NJ, Deeds JR, Wong ES, Hanner RH, Yancy HF, White KD, Thompson TM, Wahl M, Pham TD, Guichard FM, Huh I, Austin C, Dizikes G, Gerber SI. 2009. Public health response to puffer fish (tetrodotoxin) poisoning from mislabeled product. J Food Prot 72:810-817.
7. Dyck AJ, Sumaila UR. 2010. Economic impact of ocean fish populations in the global fishery. J Bioecon 12:227-243.
8. Eytan RI, Hellberg ME. 2010. Nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data reveal and conceal different demographic histories and population genetic processes in Caribbean reef fishes. Evolution 64:3380-3397.
9. Handy SM, Deeds JR, Ivanova NV, Hanner R, Hebert PDN, Ormos A, et al. 2011. A single laboratory validated method for the generation of DNA barcodes for the identification of fish for regulatory compliance. J AOAC Int 94:1-10.
10. Harris DJ. 2003. Can you bank on Gen Bank? Trends Ecol Evol 18: 317-319.
11. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:313-321. (Pubitemid 36228536)
12. HubertN, Hanner R, HolmE, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M, Watkinson D, Dumont P, Curry A, Bentzen P, Zhang J, April A, Bernatchez L. 2008. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE 3:e2490.
13. Ivanova NV, De Waard JR, Hebert PDN. 2006. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes 6:998-1002. (Pubitemid 44807923)
14. Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2007. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 544-548. (Pubitemid 47035520)
15. Jacquet J, Pauly D. 2008. Trade secrets: Renaming and mislabeling of seafood. Mar Policy 32:309-318. (Pubitemid 351461221)
16. Jacquet J, Pauly D, Ainley D, Holt S, Dayton P, Jackson J. 2010. Seafood stewardship in crisis. Nature 467:28-29.
17. Logan CA, Alter SE, Haupt AJ, Tomalty K, Palumbi SR. 2008. An impediment to consumer choice: Overfished species are sold as Pacific red snapper. Biol Conserv 141:1591-1599.
18. Lowenstein JH, Amato G, Kolokotronis SO. 2009. The real maccoyii: Identifying tuna sushi with DNA barcodes: Contrasting characteristics attributes and genetic distances. PLoS ONE 4:e7866.
19. LowensteinJH,OsmundsonTW,BeckerS,HannerR,Stiassny MLJ. 2011. Incorporating DNA barcodes into amulti-year inventoryof the fishes of the hyperdiverse Lower Congo River, with a multi-gene performance assessment of the genus Labeo as a case study. Mitochondrial DNA 22(Suppl 1):52-70.
20. Marko PB, Lee SC, Rice AM, Gramling JM, Fitzhenry TM, McAlister JS, Harper GR, Moran AL. 2004. Mislabelling of a depleted reef fish. Nature 430:309-310. (Pubitemid 38937731)
21. Messing J. 1983. New M13 vectors for cloning. Methods Enzymol 101:20-78. (Pubitemid 13071037)
22. Miller DD, Mariani S. 2010. Smoke, mirrors, and mislabeled cod: Poor transparency in the European seafood industry. Front Ecol Environ 8:517-521.
23. Nwani CD, Becker S, Braid HE, Ude EF, Okogwu OI, Hanner R. 2011. DNA barcoding discriminates freshwater fishes from southeastern Nigeria and provides river system-level phylogeo-graphic resolution within some species. Mitochondrial DNA 22(Suppl 1):43-51.
24. Rasmussen RS, Morrissey MT, Hebert PDN. 2009. DNA barcoding of commercially important Salmon and Trout species (Oncorhynchus and Salmo) from North America. J Agric Food Chem 57:8379-8385.
25. Rasmussen RS, Morrissey MT, Hanner RH. 2010. A multiplex PCR method for the identification of commercially important Salmon and Trout species (Oncorhynchus and Salmo) in North America. J Food Sci 75:C595-C606.
26. Ratnasingham S, Hebert P. 2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System. (www.barcoding.life.org) Mol Ecol Notes 7:355-364. (Pubitemid 46714172)
27. Smith PJ, McVeagh MS, Steinke D. 2008. Application of DNA barcoding for the identification of smoked fish products. J Fish Biol 72:464-471. (Pubitemid 351190165)
28. Steinke D, Hanner R. 2011. The FISH-BOL collaborators' protocol. Mitochondrial DNA 22(Suppl 1):10-14.
29. Steinke D, Zemlak TS, Boutillier JA, Hebert PDN. 2009. DNA barcoding Pacific Canada's fishes. Mar Biol 156:2641-2647.
30. Viñas J, Tudela S. 2009. Validated methodology for genetic identification of tuna species (genus Thunnus). PLoS ONE 4:e7606.
31. Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1847-1857. (Pubitemid 44365045)
32. Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol 74:329-356.
33. Wilson-Wilde L, Norman J, Robertson J, Sarre S, Georges A. 2010. Current issues in species identification for forensic science and the validity of using the cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) gene. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6:233-241.
34. Wong EHK, Hanner R. 2008. DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American seafood. Food Res Int 41: 828-837.
35. Wong E, Shivji MS, Hanner RH. 2009. Identifying sharks with DNA barcodes: Assessing the utility of a nucleotide diagnostic approach. Mol Ecol Res 9:243-250.
36. Yancy HF, Zemlak TS, Mason JA, Washington JD, Tenge BJ, Nguyen N-L, et al. 2008. The potential use of DNA barcodes in regulatory science: Applications of the Regulatory Fish Encyclopedia. J Food Prot 71:210-217.