Single-Sex School Girls Outperform Girls Attending a Co-Educative School in Mental Rotation Accuracy

Sex Roles

Volumn 65, Issue 9-10, 2011, Pages 704-711

  Titze, Corinna ^a,b   Jansen, Petra ^b   Heil, Martin ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Co education; Gender differences; Single sex schooling; Spatial cognition; Stereotype thread

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053997700     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-9947-y     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 12, 385-390.
2. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (2008). Berufsbildungsbericht 2008 [education in Germany 2008]. Bonn: BMBF.
3. Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women's underrepresentation in science: Socio-cultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218-261.
4. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Cooper, L. A., & Mumaw, R. J. (1985). Spatial aptitude. In R. F. Dillon (Ed.), Individual differences in cognition, vol 2 (pp. 67-94). New York: Academic Press.
6. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
7. Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Diversity. Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320, 1164-1165.
8. Hahn, N., Jansen, P., & Heil, M. (2010a). Preschoolers' mental rotation: Sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1244-1250.
9. Hahn, N., Jansen, P., & Heil, M. (2010b). Preschoolers' mental rotation of letters: Sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 261-267.
10. Halpern, D. F. (1989). The disappearance of cognitive gender differences: What you see depends on where you look. The American Psychologist, 44, 1156-1158.
11. Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learning and Instruction, 14, 51-67.
12. Heil, M., Rolke, B., Engelkamp, J., Rösler, F., Özcan, M., & Hennighausen, E. (1999). Event-related brain potentials during recognition of ordinary and bizarre action phrases following verbal and subject-performed encoding conditions. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 261-280.
13. Heil, M., Rösler, F., Link, M., & Bajric, J. (1998). What is improved, if a mental rotation task is repeated-Efficiency of memory access, or the speed of a transformation routine? Psychological Research, 61, 99-108.
14. Herwartz-Emden, L. (2007). "Schulkultur, Geschlechtersegregation und Mädchensozialisation"-eine Studie über Mädchenschulen ["Schooling culture, gender segregation and socialisation of girls"-a study about single-sex girls schools]. In L. Herwartz-Emden (Ed.), Neues aus alten Schulen-Empirische Studien in Mädchenschule [news from old schools-empirical studies in single-sex girls schools] (pp. 27-39). Opladen: Barbara Budrich Verlag.
15. Inzlicht, M., & Ben Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.
16. Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers' gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers' and children's ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932-944.
17. Jansen-Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2007). Developmental aspects of parietal hemispheric asymmetry during mental rotation. NeuroReport, 18, 175-178.
18. Jansen Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2007). Suitable stimuli to obtain (no) gender differences in the speed of cognitive processes involved in mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 64, 217-227.
19. Johnson, E. S., & Meade, A. C. (1987). Developmental patterns of spatial ability: An early sex difference. Child Development, 58, 725-740.
20. Kao, G. (1995). Asian Americans as model minorities? A look at their academic performance. Feb 1995. American Journal of Education, 103, 121.
21. Kerkman, D. D., Wise, J. C., & Hardwood, E. A. (2000). Impossible "mental rotation" problems. A mismeasure of women's spatial abilities? Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 253-269.
22. Kerns, K. A., & Berenbaum, S. A. (1991). Sex differences in spatial ability in children. Behavior Genetics, 21, 383-396.
23. Kessels, U. (2005). Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 309-323.
24. Kessels, U. (2007). Identifikation mit naturwissenschaftlichen Fächern: Ein Vergleich von Schülerinnen einer monoedukativen und einer koedukativen Schule [Identification with sciences: A comparison of girls attending a single-sex and a co-educative school]. In L. Herwartz-Emden (Ed.), Neues aus alten Schulen-Empirische Studien in Mädchenschule [news from old schools-empirical studies in single-sex girls schools] (pp. 161-180). Oplanden: Barbara Budrich Verlag.
25. Kessels, U., & Hannover, B. (2008). When being a girl matters less: Accessibility of gender-related self-knowledge in single-sex and coeducational classes and its impact on students' physics-related self-concept of ability. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 273-289.
26. Leone, G., Taine, M. C., & Droulez, J. (1993). The influence of long-term practice on mental rotation of 3-D objects. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 241-255.
27. Levy, B. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1092-1107.
28. Linn, M. C., & Hyde, J. S. (1989). Gender, mathematics, and science. Educational Researcher, 18, 17-27.
29. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67-101). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. Lohman, D. F., & Nichols, P. D. (1990). Training spatial abilities: Effects of practice on rotation and synthesis tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 67-93.
31. Masters, M. S., & Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics, 23, 337-341.
32. Moè, A. (2009). Are males always better than females in mental rotation? Exploring a gender belief explanation. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 21-27.
33. Moè, A., & Pazzaglia, F. (2006). Following the instructions! Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 369-377.
34. Nash, S. C. (1979). Sex role as mediator of intellectual functioning. In M. A. Wittig & A. C. Peterson (Eds.), Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning (pp. 263-302). New York: Academic Press.
35. Niedenthal, P. M., Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1985). Prototype matching: A strategy for social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 575-584.
36. Nuttall, R. L., Casey, M. B., & Pezaris, E. (2004). Spatial ability as a mediator of gender differences on mathematics tests: A biological-environmental framework. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 121-142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., & Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28, 39-58.
38. Peters, M., Lehmann, W., Takahira, S., Takeuchi, Y., & Jordan, K. (2006). Mental rotation test performance in four cross-cultural samples (n = 3367): Overall sex differences and the role of academic program in performance. Cortex, 42, 1005-1014.
39. Quaiser Pohl, C., & Lehmann, W. (2002). Girls' spatial abilities: Charting the contributions of experiences and attitudes in different academic groups. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 245-260.
40. Schoon, I. (2001). Teenage job aspirations and career attainment in adulthood: A 17-year follow-up study of teenagers who aspired to become scientists, health professionals, or engineers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 124-132.
41. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
42. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83.
43. Smithers, A., & Robinson, P. (2006). The paradox of single-sex and co-educational schooling. Buckingham: Carmichael Press.
44. Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. The American Psychologist, 60, 950-958.
45. Spence, I., Yu, J. J., Feng, J., & Marshman, J. (2009). Women match men when learning a spatial skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1097-1103.
46. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. The American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
47. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
48. Steele, J. (2003). Children's gender stereotypes about math: The role of stereotype stratification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2587-2606.
49. Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884.
50. Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 996-1013.
51. Titze, C., Jansen, P., & Heil, M. (2010a). Mental rotation performance and the effect of gender in fourth graders and adults. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 432-444.
52. Titze, C., Jansen, P., & Heil, M. (2010b). Mental rotation performance in fourth graders: No effects of gender beliefs (yet?). Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 459-463.
53. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
54. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.
55. Wraga, M., Duncan, L., Jacobs, E. C., Helt, M., & Church, J. (2006). Stereotype susceptibility narrows the gender gap in imagined self-rotation performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 813-819.