Mental rotation test performance in four cross-cultural samples (N = 3367): Overall sex differences and the role of academic program in performance

Cortex

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1005-1014

  Peters, Michael ^a   Lehmann, Wolfgang ^b   Takahira, Sayuri ^c   Takeuchi, Yoshiaki ^d   Jordan, Kirsten ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c TAMAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d AICHI UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Crosscultural; Mental rotation; Sex differences; Spatial performance; Subgroup performance

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JAPAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; SAMPLE SIZE; SEX DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 33845903606     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70206-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baenninger M and Newcombe N. The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta analysis. Sex Roles, 20: 327-343, 1989.
2. Bishop DVM. On the futility of using familial sinistrality to subclassify handedness groups. Cortex, 26: 153-155, 1990.
3. Casey BJ, Nuttall RL, Pezaris E and Benbow C. The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in math college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31: 679-705, 1995.
4. Casey MB and Brabeck MM. Exceptions to the male advantage on a spatial task: Family handedness and college major as factors identifying women who excel. Neuropsychologia, 27: 689-696, 1989.
5. Casey MB and Brabeck MM. Women who excel on a spatial task: Proposed genetic and environmental factors. Brain and Cognition, 12: 73-84, 1990.
6. Casey MB, Nuttall RL and Pezaris E. Evidence in support of a model that predicts how biological and environmental factors interact to influence spatial skills. Developmental Psycholology, 35: 1237-1247, 1999.
7. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
8. De Lisi R and Cammarano DM. Computer experience and gender differences in undergraduate mental rotation performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 12: 351-361, 1996.
9. Dietrich T, Krings T, Neulen J, Willmes K, Erberich S, Thron A and Sturm W. Effects of blood estrogen level on cortical activation patterns during cognitive activation as measured by functional MRI. Neuroimage, 13: 425-432, 2001.
10. Falk D, Froese N, Sade DS and Dudek BC. Sex differences in brain/body relationships of Rhesus monkeys and humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 36: 233-238, 1999.
11. Geary DC. Sex differences in mathematical abilities: Commentary on the math-fact retrieval hypothesis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24: 267-274, 1999.
12. Haier RJ, Jung RE, Yeo RA, Head K and Alkire MT. Structural brain variation and general intelligence. Neuroimage, 23: 425-433, 2004.
13. Hampson E. Variations in sex-related cognitive abilities across the menstrual cycle. Brain and Cognition, 14: 26-43, 1990.
14. Hausmann M, Slabbekoorn D, Van Goozen SH, Cohen-Kettenis PT and Güntürkün O. Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behavioral Neuroscience, 114: 1245-1250, 2000.
15. Hooven CK, Chabris CF, Ellison PT and Kosslyn SM. The relationship of male testosterone to components of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia, 42: 782-790, 2004.
16. Jancke L, Kleinschmidt A, Mirzazade S, Shah NJ and Freund HJ. The role of the inferior parietal cortex in linking the tactile perception and manual construction of object shapes. Cerebral Cortex, 11: 114-121, 2001.
17. Jordan K, Heinze HJ, Lutz K, Kanowski M and Jancke L. Cortical activations during the mental rotation of different visual objects. Neuroimage, 13: 143-152, 2001.
18. Jordan K, Wüstenberg T, Heinze H-J, Peters M and Jaencke L. Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks. Neuropsychologia, 40: 2397-2408, 2002.
19. Kimura D. Sex, sexual orientation and sex hormones influence human cognitive function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6: 259-263, 2002.
20. Lehmann W and Jüling I. Raumvorstellungsfähigkeit and mathematische Fähigkeiten: Unabhängige Konstrukte oder zwei Seiten einer Medaille? Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 49: 31-43, 2002.
21. Lehmann W, Jüling I and Knopf H. Allgemeine und domänenspezifische kognitive Leistungen: Eine vergleichende Untersuchung in mathematisch und sprachlich orientierten Gymnasien. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 16: 29-41, 2002.
22. Li C, Nuttall RL and Zhu W. Writing Chinese characters and success on Mental Rotation Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88: 1261-1270, 1999.
23. Linn MC and Petersen AC. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56: 1479-1498, 1985.
24. Mann VA, Sasanuma S, Sakuma N and Masaki S. Sex differences in cognitive abilities: A cross-cultural perspective. Neuropsychologia, 28: 1063-1077, 1990.
25. Masters MS and Sanders B. Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics, 23: 337-341, 1993.
26. Peters M, Chisholm P and Laeng B. Spatial ability, student gender and academic performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 84: 69-73, 1995a.
27. Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R and Richarson C. A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Tests: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28: 39-58, 1995b.
28. Quaiser-Pohl C. Zum Einfluss des Wohnviertels auf die Raumvorstellung and die kognitiven Landkarten von 7- bis 12- jährigen. Psychologie in Erziehung and Unterricht, 48: 280-297,2001.
29. Quaiser-Pohl C and Lehmann W. Girls' spatial abilities: Charting the contributions of experiences and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72: 245-260, 2002.
30. Qubeck WJ. Mean differences among subcomponents of Vandenberg's Mental Rotation Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85: 323-332, 1997.
31. Rahman Q and Wilson GD. Large sexual-orientation-related differences in performance on mental rotation and judgement of line orientation tasks. Neuropsychology, 17: 25-31, 2003.
32. Shepard S and Metzler D. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171: 701-703, 1971.
33. Shepard S and Metzler D. Mental rotation: Effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14: 3-11, 1988.
34. Silverman I, Phillips K and Silverman LK. Homogeneity of effect sizes for sex across spatial tests and cultures: Implications for hormonal theories. Brain and Cognition, 31: 90-94, 1996.
35. Spencer SJ, Steele CM and Quinn DM. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 35: 4-28, 1999.
36. Tagaris GA, Kim SG, Strupp JP, Andersen P, Ugurbil K and Georgopoulos AP. Quantitative relations between parietal activation and performance in mental rotation. Neuroreport, 7: 773-776, 1996.
37. Thomsen T, Hugdahl K, Ersland L, Barndon R, Lundervold A, Smievoll AI, Roscher BE and Sundberg H. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of sex differences in a mental rotation task. Medical Science Monitor, 6: 1186-1196, 2000.
38. Vandenberg SG and Kuse AR. Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47: 599-604, 1978.
39. Voyer D, Voyer S and Bryden MP. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 250-270, 1995.
40. Wickett JC, Vernon PA and Lee DH. In vivo brain size, head perimeter, and intelligence in a sample of healthy adult females. Personality and Individual Differences, 16: 831-838, 1994.