Human oocytes reprogram somatic cells to a pluripotent state

Nature

Volumn 478, Issue 7367, 2011, Pages 70-75

  Noggle, Scott ^a   Fung, Ho Lim ^b   Gore, Athurva ^b   Martinez, Hector ^a   Satriani, Kathleen Crumm ^c   Prosser, Robert ^c   Oum, Kiboong ^c   Paull, Daniel ^a   Druckenmiller, Sarah ^a   Freeby, Matthew ^c   Greenberg, Ellen ^c   Zhang, Kun ^b   Goland, Robin ^c   Sauer, Mark V ^c   Leibel, Rudolph L ^c   Egli, Dieter ^a  

^a New York Stem Cell Foundation Laboratory   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL ORGANELLE; DISEASE INCIDENCE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CELL DIVISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; GERM LAYER; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATIC CELL; TRIPLOIDY;

ADULT; BLASTOCYST; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENOME, HUMAN; GERM LAYERS; HUMANS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OOCYTE DONATION; OOCYTES; PRIMARY CELL CULTURE; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; TRIPLOIDY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053916211     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature10397     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Wilmut, I., Schnieke, A. E., McWhir, J., Kind, A. J. & Campbell, K. H. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385, 810-813 (1997). (Pubitemid 27106068)
2. Thomson, J. A. et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145-1147 (1998). (Pubitemid 28516247)
3. French, A. J. et al.Development of human cloned blastocysts followingsomatic cell nuclear transfer with adult fibroblasts. Stem Cells 26, 485-493 (2008). (Pubitemid 351413608)
4. Hall, V. J. et al. Developmental competence of human in vitro aged oocytes as host cells for nuclear transfer. Hum. Reprod. 22, 52-62 (2007). (Pubitemid 44942666)
5. Stojkovic, M. et al. Derivation of a human blastocyst after heterologous nuclear transfer to donated oocytes. Reprod. Biomed. Online 11, 226-231 (2005). (Pubitemid 41086950)
6. Cibelli, J. et al. Somatic cell nuclear transfer in humans: pronuclear and early embryonic development. J. Regen. Med. 2, 25-31 (2001). (Pubitemid 34852594)
7. Kennedy, D. Editorial retraction. Science 311, 335 (2006). (Pubitemid 43132637)
8. McElroy, S. L. et al. Developmental competence of immature and failed/abnormally fertilized human oocytes in nuclear transfer. Reprod. Biomed. Online 16, 684-693 (2008).
9. Chung, Y. et al. Reprogramming of human somatic cells using human and animal oocytes. Cloning Stem Cells 11, 213-223 (2009).
10. Heindryckx, B., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J., Dhont, M. & Van der Elst, J. Embryo development after successful somatic cell nuclear transfer to in vitro matured human germinal vesicle oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 22, 1982-1990 (2007). (Pubitemid 47062767)
11. Egli, D., Chen, A. E.,Melton, D.&Eggan, K.Impracticality ofeggdonor recruitment in the absence of compensation. Cell Stem Cell doi:10.1016/j.stem. 2011.08.002 (in the press).
12. Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861-872 (2007). (Pubitemid 350138099)
13. Chin, M. H. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. Cell Stem Cell 5, 111-123 (2009).
14. Ghosh, Z. et al. Persistent donor cell gene expression among human induced pluripotent stem cells contributes to differences with human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 5, e8975 (2010).
15. Doi, A. et al. Differential methylation of tissue-and cancer-specific CpG island shores distinguishes humaninduced pluripotent stemcells, embryonic stemcells and fibroblasts. Nature Genet. 41, 1350-1353 (2009).
16. Lister, R. et al.Hotspots ofaberrantepigenomic reprogramming inhumaninduced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 471, 68-73 (2011).
17. Hu, B. Y. et al. Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4335-4340 (2010).
18. Gore, A. et al. Somatic coding mutations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 471, 63-67 (2011).
19. Hussein, S. M. et al. Copynumber variationandselectionduringreprogramming to pluripotency. Nature 471, 58-62 (2011).
20. Mayshar, Y. et al. Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7, 521-531 (2010).
21. Revazova, E. S. et al. Patient-specific stem cell lines derived from human parthenogenetic blastocysts. Cloning Stem Cells 9, 432-449 (2007).
22. Egli, D., Chen, A. E., Melton, D. & Eggan, K. Reprogramming occurs within hours after mouse but not human nuclear transfer. Nature Commun. doi:10.1038/ncomms1503 (in the press).
23. Klitzman, R.&Sauer, M. V. Payment of egg donors in stemcell research in the USA. Reprod. Biomed. Online 18, 603-608 (2009).
24. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology & the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil. Steril. 87, 1253-1266 (2007).
25. The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Financial compensation of oocyte donors. Fertil. Steril. 88, 305-309 (2007).
26. Daley, G. Q. et al. Ethics. The ISSCR guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research. Science 315, 603-604 (2007). (Pubitemid 46214694)
27. Mitalipov, S. M. et al. Reprogramming following somatic cell nuclear transfer in primates is dependent upon nuclear remodeling. Hum. Reprod. 22, 2232-2242 (2007). (Pubitemid 47241869)
28. Braude, P., Bolton, V.& Moore, S. Humangene expression first occurs between the four-and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature 332, 459-461 (1988). (Pubitemid 18090251)
29. Draper, J. S. et al. Recurrent gain of chromosomes 17q and 12 in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 53-54 (2004). (Pubitemid 38057956)
30. Zhang, K. et al. Digital RNA allelotyping reveals tissue-specific and allele-specific gene expression in human. Nature Methods 6, 613-618 (2009).
31. Cowan, C. A., Atienza, J., Melton, D. A. & Eggan, K. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells after fusion with human embryonic stem cells. Science 309, 1369-1373 (2005). (Pubitemid 41209363)
32. Kim, K. et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 467, 285-290 (2010).
33. Chen, A. E. et al. Optimal timing of inner cell mass isolation increases the efficiency of human embryonic stem cell derivation and allows generation of sibling cell lines. Cell Stem Cell 4, 103-106 (2009).
34. Cowan, C. A. et al. Derivation ofembryonic stem-cell lines fromhuman blastocysts. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 1353-1356 (2004). (Pubitemid 38375373)
35. Dimos, J. T. et al. Induced pluripotent stemcells generated from patients with ALS can be differentiated into motor neurons. Science 321, 1218-1221 (2008).
36. Freberg, C. T., Dahl, J. A., Timoskainen, S.& Collas, P. Epigenetic reprogramming of OCT4 and NANOG regulatory regions by embryonal carcinoma cell extract. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 1543-1553 (2007). (Pubitemid 46717539)
37. Imamura, M. et al. Transcriptional repression and DNA hypermethylation of a small set of ES cell marker genes in male germline stemcells. BMC Dev. Biol. 6, 34 (2006).
38. Pick, M. et al. Clone-andgene-specific aberrations ofparentalimprinting inhuman induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 27, 2686-2690 (2009).