Predicted residue-residue contacts can help the scoring of 3D models

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 78, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1980-1991

  Tress, Michael L ^a   Valencia, Alfonso ^a  

^a Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas   (Spain)

Author keywords

Protein structure; Residue residue contacts; Structural prediction

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ACCURACY; ARTICLE; MOLECULAR MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AMINO ACIDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 77953529848     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22714     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Altschuh D, Lesk AM, Bloomer AC, Klug A. Correlation of coordinated amino acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic virus. J Mol Biol. 1987; 193: 693-707.
2. Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 1994; 18: 309-317. (Pubitemid 24111530)
3. Olmea O, Valencia A. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold Des Suppl 1997; 2: 25-32.
4. Kundrotas PJ, Alexov EG. Predicting residue contacts using pragmatic correlated mutations method: reducing the false positives. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7: 503.
5. Fodor AA, Aldrich RW. Influence of conservation on calculations of amino acid covariance in multiple sequence alignments. Proteins 2004; 56: 211-221.
6. Pollastri G, Baldi P. Prediction of contact maps by GIOHMMs and recurrent neural networks using lateral propagation from all four cardinal corners. Bioinformatics 2002; 18: 62-70.
7. Shao Y, Bystroff C. Predicting interresidue contacts using templates and pathways. Proteins 2003; 53: 497-502.
8. MacCallum RM. Striped sheets and protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 224-231.
9. Punta M, Rost B. PROFcon: novel predictions of long-range contacts. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 2960-2968.
10. Cheng J, Baldi P. Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8: 113.
11. Fariselli P, Olmea O, Valencia A, Casadio R. Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins 2001; 5: 157-162.
12. Shackelford G, Karplus K. Contact prediction using mutual information and neural nets. Proteins 2007; 69: 159-164.
13. Lesk AM. CASP2: report on ab initio predictions. Proteins 1997; 29: 151-166.
14. Orengo CA, Bray JE, Hubbard TJP, LoConte L, Sillitoe I. Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction. Proteins .1999; 37: 149-170.
15. Lesk AM, Lo Conte L, Hubbard TJP. Assessment of novel fold targets in CASP4: predictions of three-dimensional structures, secondary structures, and inter-residue contacts. Proteins 2001; 45: 98-118.
16. Aloy P, Stark A, Hadley C, Russell RB. Predictions without templates: new folds, secondary structure, and contacts in CASP5. Proteins 2003; 53: 436-456.
17. Grana O, Baker D, MacCallum RM, Meiler J, Punta M, Rost B, Tress ML, Valencia A. CASP6 assessment of contact prediction. Proteins 2005; 61: 214-224.
18. Izarzugaza JMG, Graña O, Tress ML, Valencia A, Clarke ND. Assessment of intramolecular contact predictions for CASP7. Proteins 2007; 69: 152-158.
19. Ezkurdia I, Graña O, Izarzugaza JMG, Tress ML. Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8. Proteins 2009; 77: 196-209.
20. Ashkenazy H, Unger R, Kliger Y. Optimal data collection for correlated mutation analysis. Proteins 2009; 74: 545-555.
21. Bacardit J, Stout M, Hirst JD, Valencia A, Smith RE, Krasnogor N. Automated alphabet reduction for protein datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10: 6.
22. Björkholm P, Daniluk P, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Andersson R, Hvidsten TR. Using multi-data hidden Markov models trained on local neighborhoods of protein structure to predict residue-residue contacts. Bioinformatics 2009; 25: 1264-1270.
23. Rajgaria R, McAllister SR, Floudas CA. Towards accurate residueresidue hydrophobic contact prediction for alpha helical proteins via integer linear optimization. Proteins 2009; 74: 929-947.
24. Tegge AN, Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J. NNcon: improved protein contact map prediction using 2D-recursive neural networks. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37: W515-W518.
25. Walsh I, Baù D, Martin AJ, Mooney C, Vullo A, Pollastri G. Ab initio and template-based prediction of multi-class distance maps by twodimensional recursive neural networks. BMC Struct Biol 2009; 9: 5.
26. Wu S, Zhang Y. A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 924-931.
27. Xue B, Faraggi E, Zhou Y. Predicting residue-residue contact maps by a two-layer, integrated neural-network method. Proteins 2009; 76: 176-183.
28. Karplus K. SAM-T08, HMM-based protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37: W492-497.
29. Zhou H, Pandit SB, Skolnick J. Performance of the Pro-sp3TASSER server in CASP8. Proteins 2009; 77: 123-127.
30. McGuffin LJ, Jones DT. Improvement of the GenTHREADER method, for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 874-881.
31. Li W, Zhang Y, Skolnik J. Application of sparse NMR restraints to large-scale protein structure prediction. Biophys J 2004; 87: 1241-1248.
32. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz AR. MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 1997; 265: 217-241.
33. Zhang Y. I-TASSER: fully automated protein structure prediction in CASP8. Proteins 2009; 77: 100-113.
34. Olmea O, Rost B, Valencia A. Effective use of sequence correlation and conservation in fold recognition. J Mol Biol 1999; 293: 1221-1239.
35. Eyal E, Frenkel-Morgenstern M, Sobolev V, Pietrokovski S. A pairto-pair amino acids substitution matrix and its applications for protein structure prediction. Proteins 2007; 67: 142-153.
36. Miller CS, Eisenberg D. Using inferred residue contacts to distinguish, between correct and incorrect protein models. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 1575-1582.
37. CASP8 web pages; Available at: http://predictioncenter.org/download-area/ CASP8/predictions/RR.tar.gz.
38. Tress ML, Ezkurdia I, Richardson JS. Domain definition and target classification, CASP8. Proteins 2009; 77: 10-17.
39. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999; 37: 22-29.
40. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3370-3374.
41. CASP8 web pages; Available at: http://predictioncenter.org/casp8/index. cgi.
42. Cheng J, Wang Z, Tegge AN, Eickholt J. Prediction of global and local quality of CASP8 models by MULTICOM series. Proteins 2009; 77: 181-184.
43. Wu S, Zhang Y. MUSTER: improving protein sequence profile-profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins 2008; 72: 547-556.
44. Raman S, Vernon R, Thompson J, Tyka M, Sadreyev R, Pei J, Kim D, Kellogg E, Dimaio F, Lange O, Kinch L, Sheffler W, Kim BH, Das R, Grishin NV, Baker D. Structure prediction for CASP8 with all-atom refinement using Rosetta. Proteins 2009; 77: 89-99.
45. Venclovas C, Margelevièius M. The use of automatic tools and human expertise in template-based modeling of CASP8 target proteins. Proteins 2009; 77: 81-88.
46. Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc 2009; 4: 363-371.
47. Larsson P, Skwark MJ, Wallner B, Elofsson A. Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ. Proteins 2009; 77: 167-172.
48. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions. Proteins 2009; 77: 157-166.
49. McGuffin LJ. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP8 using the ModFOLD server. Proteins 2009; 77: 185-190.
50. Benkert P, Tosatto SCE, Schwede T. Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust. Proteins 2009; 77: 173-180.
51. Archie JG, Paluszewski M, Karplus K. Applying undertaker to quality assessment. Proteins 2009; 77: 191-195.
52. Paluszewski M, Karplus K. Model quality assessment using distance constraints from alignments. Proteins 2009; 75: 540-549.
53. Archie J, Karplus K. Applying undertaker cost functions to model quality assessment. Proteins 2009; 75: 550-555.
54. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz AR. MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 1997; 265: 217-241,