A novel approach using Dynamic Social Impact Theory for optimization of impedance-Tongue (iTongue)

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 65-76

  Bhondekar, Amol P ^a   Kaur, Rishemjit ^a   Kumar, Ritesh ^a   Vig, Renu ^b   Kapur, Pawan ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHEMICAL LABORATORY   (India)

^b PANJAB UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Dynamic Social Impact Theory; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS); Electronic tongue; Feature subset selection; Genetic Algorithms (GA); Impedance tongue; Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO); Support vector machine (SVM)

Indexed keywords

GOLD; PLATINUM;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMIC SOCIAL IMPACT THEORY; ELECTROCHEMICAL IMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPY; ELECTRODE; ELECTRONIC SENSOR; FUZZY SYSTEM; GENETIC ALGORITHM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; TEA; THEORY VALIDATION; VALIDITY;

EID: 80053643822     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Vlasov Y., Legin A., Rudnitskya A., Natale C.D., D'Amico A. Nonspecific sensor arrays (electronic tongue) for chemical analysis of liquids (IUPAC technical report). Pure and Applied Chemistry 2005, 77:1965-1983.
2. Di Natale C., Davide F., Brunink J.A.J., D'Amico A., Vlasov Y., Legin A., Rudnitskya A. Multicomponent analysis of heavy metal cations and inorganic anions in liquids by a non-selective chalcogenide glass sensor array. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 1996, 34:539-542.
3. Iiyama S., Ezaki S., Toko K., Matsuno T., Yamafuji K. Study of astringency and pungency with multichannel taste sensor made of lipid membranes. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 1995, 24:75-79.
4. Vlasov Y., Legin A., Rudnitskya A., Bychkov E. Cross-sensitivity of chalcogenide glass sensors in solutions of heavy metal ions. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 1996, 34:456-461.
5. Lvova L., Legin A., Vlasov Y., Cha G.S., Nam H. Multicomponent analysis of Korean green tea by means of disposable all-solid-state potentiometric electronic tongue microsystem. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2003, 95:391-399.
6. Ivarsson P., Krantz-Rülcker C., Winquist F., Lundstrom I. A voltammetric electronic tongue. Chemical Senses 2005, 30:i258-i259.
7. Ivarsson P., Holmin S., Höjer N.E., Krantz-Rülcker C., Winquist F. Discrimination of tea by means of a voltammetric electronic tongue and different applied waveforms. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2001, 76:449-454.
8. Hai-Jun Z., Shao-Ping D., Shi-Yi T. A virtual smart tongue for multifrequency large amplitude pulse voltammetry. GCIS '09. WRI Global Congress on, 2009 2009, 8-13. Intelligent Systems.
9. Scampicchio M., Benedetti S., Brunetti B., Mannino S. Amperometric electronic tongue for the evaluation of the tea astringency. Electroanalysis 2006, 18:1643-1648.
10. Cortina-Puig M., Muñoz-Berbel X., Alonso-Lomillo M.A., Muñoz-Pascual F.J., del Valle M. EIS multianalyte sensing with an automated SIA system-an electronic tongue employing the impedimetric signal. Talanta 2007, 72:774-779.
11. Pioggia G., Di Francesco F., Marchetti A., Ferro M., Ahluwalia A. A composite sensor array impedentiometric electronic tongue: part I. Characterization. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2007, 22:2618-2623.
12. Riul A., Malmegrim R.R., Fonseca F.J., Mattoso L.H.C. An artificial taste sensor based on conducting polymers. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2003, 18:1365-1369.
13. Riul A., Gallardo Soto A.M., Mello S.V., Bone S., Taylor D.M., Mattoso L.H.C. An electronic tongue using polypyrrole and polyaniline. Synthetic Metals 2003, 132:109-116.
14. Riul A., de Sousa H.C., Malmegrim R.R., dos Santos D.S., Carvalho A.C.P.L.F., Fonseca F.J., Oliveira O.N., Mattoso L.H.C. Wine classification by taste sensors made from ultra-thin films and using neural networks. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2004, 98:77-82.
15. Bhondekar A., Dhiman M., Sharma A., Bhakta A., Ganguli A., Bari S.S., Vig R., Kapur P., Singla M.L. A novel iTongue for Indian black tea discrimination. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2010, 148:601-609.
16. Winquist F., Holmin S., Krantz-Rülcker C., Wide P., Lundström I. A hybrid electronic tongue. Analytica Chimica Acta 2000, 406:147-157.
17. Olsson J., Winquist F., Lundström I. A self polishing electronic tongue. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2006, 118:461-465.
18. Chen Q., Zhao J., Vittayapadung S. Identification of the green tea grade level using electronic tongue and pattern recognition. Food Research International 2008, 41:500-504.
19. Palit M., Tudu B., Dutta P.K., Dutta A., Jana A., Roy J.K., Bhattacharyya N., Bandyopadhyay R., Chatterjee A. Classification of black tea taste and correlation with tea taster's mark using voltammetric electronic tongue. Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on 2010, 59:2230-2239.
20. Bhondekar A., Vig R., Gulati A., Singla M., Kapur P. Performance evaluation of a novel iTongue for Indian black tea discrimination. Sensors Journal, IEEE 2011, 10.1109/JSEN.2011.2161279.
21. Gardner J.W., Boilot P., Hines E.L. Enhancing electronic nose performance by sensor selection using a new integer-based genetic algorithm approach. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2005, 106:114-121.
22. Boilot P., Hines E.L., Gongora M.A., Folland R.S. Electronic noses inter-comparison, data fusion and sensor selection in discrimination of standard fruit solutions. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2003, 88:80-88.
23. Buratti S., Ballabio D., Benedetti S., Cosio M.S. Prediction of Italian red wine sensorial descriptors from electronic nose, electronic tongue and spectrophotometric measurements by means of genetic algorithm regression models. Food Chemistry 2007, 100:211-218.
24. Herrero A., Cruz Ortiz M. Qualitative and quantitative aspects of the application of genetic algorithm-based variable selection in polarography and stripping voltammetry. Analytica Chimica Acta 1999, 378:245-259.
25. Buehler M.G., Kuhlman G.M., Keymeulen D., Kounaves S.P. Advanced electronic tongue concept. Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2002 2002, 407-416. IEEE.
26. Men H., Ge Z.N., Liu H.Y., Wen R.X., Xu Z.M. Optimization of sensor array data with various pattern recognition techniques. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2010, 20-23:694-699.
27. Macaš M., Lhotská L. Social impact theory based optimizer. Advances in Artificial Life 2007, 635-644. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. F. Almeida e Costa, L. Rocha, E. Costa, I. Harvey, A. Coutinho (Eds.).
28. Macaš M., Lhotská L., Kremen V. Social impact based approach to feature subset selection. Nature Inspired Cooperative Strategies for Optimization (NICSO 2007) 2008, 239-248. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. N. Krasnogor, G. Nicosia, M. Pavone, D. Pelta (Eds.).
29. Macaš M., Lhotská L. Social impact and optimization. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research 2008, 4:129-136.
30. Latané B. The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 1981, 36:343-356.
31. Nowak A., Szamrej J., Latané B. From private attitude to public opinion: a dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review 1990, 97:362-376.
32. Lewenstein M., Nowak A., Latané B. Statistical mechanics of social impact. Physical Review A 1992, 45:763-776.
33. Stouffer S., Guttman L., Suchman E.A., Lazarsfeld P., Star S., Clausen J. Studies in Social Psychology in World War II 1950, Princeton University Press.
34. Borah S., Hines E.L., Bhuyan M. Wavelet transform based image texture analysis for size estimation applied to the sorting of tea granules. Journal of Food Engineering 2007, 79:629-639.
35. The grading of tea 19 July,2011. http://www.wtea.com/about-tea_grading.aspx.
36. Grading, sorting and packing 19 July,2011. http://www.tocklai.net/TeaManufacture/sorting.aspx.
37. Hsu C.W., Chang C.C., Lin C.J. A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification 2003.
38. Chang C.C., Lin C.J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2011, 2:27:21-27:27.
39. Somol P., Novovicova J. Evaluating stability and comparing output of feature selectors that optimize feature subset cardinality. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 2010, 32:1921-1939.
40. Kalousis A., Prados J., Hilario M. Stability of feature selection algorithms. Data Mining, Fifth IEEE International Conference on, 2005 2005, 8.
41. Kuncheva L. A stability index for feature selection. Proceedings of the 25th conference on Proceedings of the 25th IASTED International Multi-Conference: Artificial Intelligence and Applications 2007, 390-395. ACTA Press, Innsbruck, Austria.
42. Iswandy K., König A. Feature selection with acquisition cost for optimizing sensor system design. Advances in Radio Science 2006, 4:135-141.
43. Iswandy K., König A. Methodology, algorithms, and emerging tool for automated design of intelligent integrated multi-sensor systems. Algorithms 2009, 2:1368-1409.
44. Iswandy K., König A. Feature-level fusion by multi-objective binary particle swarm based unbiased feature selection for optimized sensor system design. Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, 2006 IEEE International Conference on 2006, 365-370.
45. Dunne K., Cunningham P., Azuaje F. Solutions to instability problems with sequential wrapper-based approaches to feature selection. Technical Report TCD-CS-2002-28 2002, Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.