Broad coverage multilingual deep sentence generation with a stochastic multi-level realizer

Coling 2010 - 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 98-106

  Bohnet, Bernd ^a   Wanner, Leo ^a,b   Mille, Simon ^a   Burga, Alicia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ART RESEARCH; MULTI-LEVEL; MULTIPLE LANGUAGES; SEMANTIC PARSING; SEMANTIC STRUCTURES; SYNTACTICALLY ANNOTATED CORPUS; TEXT GENERATIONS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; SEMANTICS;

STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053390408     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Bangalore, S. and O. Rambow. 2000. Exploiting a Probabilistic Hierarchical Model for Generation. In Proceedings of COLING'00, pages 42-48.
2. Bangalore, S., J. Chen, and O. Rambow. 2001. Impact of Quality and Quantity of Corpora on Stochastic Generation. In Proceedings of the EMNLP Conference, pages 159-166.
3. Bateman, J.A., I. Kruijff-Korbayovà, and G.-J. Kruijff. 2005. Multilingual Resource Sharing Across Both Related and Unrelated Languages: An Implemented, Open-Source Framework for Practical Natural Language Generation. Research on Language and Computation, 15:1-29.
4. Belz, A. 2008. Automatic generation of weather forecast texts using comprehensive probabilistic generation-space models. Natural Language Engineering, 14(4):431-455.
5. Bohnet, B. 2004. A graph grammar approach to map between dependency trees and topological models. In Proceedings of the IJCNLP, pages 636-645. (Pubitemid 41421791)
6. Bröker, N. 1998. Separating Surface Order and Syntactic Relations in a Dependency Grammar. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL'98.
7. Crammer, K., O. Dekel, S. Shalev-Shwartz, and Y. Singer. 2006. Online Passive-Aggressive Algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:551-585. (Pubitemid 43668115)
8. Duchier, D. and R. Debusmann. 2001. Topological dependency trees: A constraint-based account of linear precedence. In Proceedings of the ACL.
9. Elhadad, M. and J. Robin. 1996. An overview of SURGE: A reusable comprehensive syntactic realization component. Technical Report TR 96-03, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Ben Gurion University.
10. Filippova, K. and M. Strube. 2008. Sentence fusion via dependency graph compression. In Proceedings of the EMNLP Conference.
11. Filippova, K. and M. Strube. 2009. Tree linearization in English: Improving language model based approaches. In Proceedings of the NAACL'09 and HLT, Short Papers, pages 225-228.
12. Gerdes, K. and S. Kahane. 2001. Word order in German: A formal dependency grammar using a topological hierarchy. In Proceedings of the ACL.
13. Hajič, J. et al. 2009. The CoNLL-2009 Shared Task: Syntactic and Semantic Dependencies in Multiple Languages. In Proceedings of the CoNLL.
14. He, W., H. Wang, Y. Guo, and T. Liu. 2009. Dependency based chinese sentence realization. In Proceedings of the ACL and of the IJCNLP of the AFNLP, pages 809-816.
15. Knight, K. and V. Hatzivassiloglou. 1995. Two-level, many paths generation. In Proceedings of the ACL.
16. Langkilde, I. and K. Knight. 1998. Generation that exploits corpus-based statistical knowledge. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL, pages 704-710.
17. Langkilde-Geary, I. 2002. An empirical verification of coverage and correctness for a general-purpose sentence generator. In Proceedings of the Second INLG Conference, pages 17-28.
18. Lavoie, B. and O. Rambow. 1997. A fast and portable realizer for text generation systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on ANLP.
19. Levenshtein, V.I. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics, 10:707-710.
20. Mellish, C., D. Scott, L. Cahill, D. Paiva, R. Evans, and M. Reape. 2006. A reference architecture for natural language generation systems. Natural Language Engineering, 12(1):1-34. (Pubitemid 43842150)
21. Minnen, G., J. Carroll, and D. Pearce. 2001. Applied morphological processing for English. Natural Language Engineering, 7(3):207-223.
22. Oh, A.H. and A.I. Rudnicky. 2000. Stochastic language generation for spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the ANL/NAACL Workshop on Conversational Systems, pages 27-32.
23. Palmer, M., D. Gildea, and P. Kingsbury. 2005. The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71-105. (Pubitemid 43677420)
24. Ringger, E., M. Gamon, R.C. Moore, D. Rojas, M. Smets, and S. Corston-Oliver. 2004. Linguistically informed statistical models of constituent structure for ordering in sentence realization. In Proceedings of COLING, pages 673-679.
25. Wan, S., M. Dras, Dale R., and C. Paris. 2009. Improving Grammaticality in Statistical Sentence Generation: Introducing a Dependency Spanning Tree Algorithm with an Argument Satisfaction Model. In Proceedings of the EACL'09, pages 852-860.