Separating surface order and syntactic relations in a dependency grammar

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1, Issue , 1998, Pages 174-180

  Bröker, Norbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

DECOUPLINGS; DEPENDENCY GRAMMAR; DEPENDENCY TREES; DOMAIN STRUCTURE; LEXICAL AMBIGUITY; ORDER DOMAIN; SURFACE ORDERING; SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCY TREES; WORD ORDERS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84884771358     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Becker, T., A. Joshi & O. Rambow (1991). Long-Distance scrambling and tree-adjoining grammar. In Proc. 5th Conf. of the European Chapter of the ACL, pp. 21-26.
2. Bhatt, C. (1990). Die syntaktische Struktur der Nominalphrase im Deutschen. Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 38. Tübingen: Narr.
3. Blackburn, P. (1994). Structures, Languages and Translations: The Structural Approach to Feature Logic. In C. Rupp, M. Rosner & R. Johnson (Eds.), Constraints, Language and Computation, pp. 1-27. London: Academic Press.
4. Bröker, N. (1997). Eine Dependenzgrammatik zur Kopplung heterogener Wissenssysteme auf modallogischer Basis. Dissertation, Deutsches Seminar, Universität Freiburg.
5. Bröker, N. (1998a). How to define a context-free backbone for DGs: An experiment in grammar conversion. In Proc. of the COLING-A CL '98 workshop "Processing of Dependencybased Grammars". Montreal/CAN, Aug. 15, 1998.
6. Bröker, N. (1998b). A Projection Architecture for Dependency Grammar and How it Compares to LFG. In Proc. 1998 Int'l Lexical-Functional Grammar Conference. (accepted as alternate paper) Brisbane/AUS: Jun. 30-Jul. 2, 1998.
7. Eisner, J. (1997). Bilexical Grammars and a Cubic-Time Probabilistic Parser. In Proc. of Int'l Workshop on Parsing Technologies, pp. 54-65. Boston/MA: MIT.
8. Gaifman, H. (1965). Dependency Systems and Phrase Structure Systems. Information and Control, 8:304-337.
9. Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding. Oxford/UK: Basil Blackwell.
10. Hahn, U., P. Neuhaus & N. Bröker (1997). Message-Passing Protocols for Real-World Parsing - An Object-Oriented Model and its Preliminary Evaluation. In Proc. Int'l Workshop on Parsing Technology, pp. 101-112. Boston/MA: MIT, Sep. 17-21, 1997.
11. Hellwig, P. (1986). Dependency Unification Grammar. In Proc. 11th Int'l Conf on Computational Linguistics, pp. 195-198.
12. Hepple, M. (1994). Discontinuity and the Lambek Calculus. In Proc. 15th Int'l Conf. on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1235-1239. Kyoto/JP.
13. Hudson, R. (1990). English Word Grammar. Oxford/UK: Basil Blackwell.
14. Hudson, R. (1993). Recent developments in dependency theory. In J. Jacobs, A. v. Stechow, W. Sternefeld & T. Vennemann (Eds.), Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, pp. 329-338. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
15. Kaplan, R. (1995). The formal architecture of Lexical-Functional Grammar. In M. Dalrymple, R. Kaplan, J. I. Maxwell & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar, pp. 7-27. Stanford University.
16. Kaplan, R. & J. Bresnan (1982). Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation. In J. Bresnan & R. Kaplan (Eds.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 173-281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Kruijff, G.-J. v. (1997). A Basic Dependency-Based Logical Grammar. Draft Manuscript. Prague: Charles University.
18. Maruyama, H. (1990). Structural Disambiguation with Constraint Propagation. In Proc. 28th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pp. 31-38. Pittsburgh/PA.
19. Matthews, P. (1981). Syntax. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics, Cambridge/UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
20. McCord, M. (1990). Slot Grammar: A System for Simpler Construction of Practical Natural Language Grammars. In R. Studer (Ed.), Natural Language and Logic, pp. 118-145. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
21. Melc'ǔk, I. (1988). Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany/NY: State Univ. Press of New York.
22. Melc'ǔk, I. & N. Pertsov (1987). Surface Syntax of English: A Formal Model within the MTT Framework. Philadelphia/PA: John Benjamins.
23. Neuhaus, P. & N. Bröker (1997). The Complexity of Recognition of Linguistically Adequate Dependency Grammars. In Proc. 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL and 8th Conf. of the EACL, pp. 337-343. Madrid, July 7-12, 1997.
24. Reape, M. (1993). A Formal Theory of Word Order: A Case Study in West Germanic. Doctoral Dissertation. Univ. of Edinburg.
25. Schabes, Y., A. Abeille & A. Joshi (1988). Parsing Strategies with 'Lexicalized' Grammars: Application to TAGs. In Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. on Computational Linguistics, pp. 578-583.
26. Sgall, P., E. Hajicova & J. Panevova (1986). The Meaning of the Sentence in its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Dordrecht/NL: D. Reidel.
27. Tesnière, L. (1959). Eleménts de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksiek.