Linguistically informed statistical models of constituent structure for ordering in sentence realization

COLING 2004 - Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages

  Ringger, Eric ^a   Gamon, Michael ^a   Moore, Robert C ^a   Rojas, David ^b   Smets, Martine ^a   Corston Oliver, Simon ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORESTRY;

CONDITIONAL MODELS; FEATURES SELECTION; JOINT MODELS; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; REFERENCE POINTS; SIMPLE++; STATISTIC MODELING; STATISTICAL PARSING MODELS; TREEBANKS; UNORDERED TREES;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 85081225338     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Aikawa T., Melero M., Schwartz L. Wu A. 2001. Multilingual sentence generation. In Proc. of 8th European Workshop on NLG. pp. 57-63.
2. Bangalore S. Rambow O. 2000. Exploiting a probabilistic hierarchical model for generation. In Proc. of COLING. pp. 42-48.
3. Calloway, C. 2003. Evaluating Coverage for Large Symbolic NLG Grammars. In Proc. of IJCAI 2003. pp 811-817.
4. Charniak E. 1997. Statistical Techniques for Natural Language Parsing, In AI Magazine.
5. Charniak E. 2000. A Maximum-Entropy-Inspired Parser. In Proc. of ACL. pp.132-139.
6. Chickering D. M. 2002. The WinMine Toolkit. Microsoft Technical Report 2002-103.
7. Corston-Oliver S., Gamon M., Ringger E., Moore R. 2002. An overview of Amalgam: a machine-learned generation module. In Proc. of INLG. pp.33-40.
8. Daumé III H., Knight K., Langkilde-Geary I., Marcu D., Yamada K. 2002. The Importance of Lexicalized Syntax Models for Natural Language Generation Tasks. In Proc. of INLG. pp. 9-16.
9. Gamon M., Ringger E., Corston-Oliver S. 2002a. Amalgam: A machine-learned generation module. Microsoft Technical Report 2002-57.
10. Gamon M., Ringger E., Corston-Oliver S., Moore R. 2002b. Machine-learned contexts for linguistic operations in German sentence realization. In Proc. of ACL. pp. 25-32.
11. Heidorn G. 2000. Intelligent Writing Assistance. In A Handbook of Natural Language Processing,, R. Dale, H. Moisl, H. Somers (eds.). Marcel Dekker, NY.
12. Klein D., Manning C. 2003. "Accurate Unlexicalized Parsing." In Proceedings of ACL-03.
13. Langkilde I. 2000. Forest-Based Statistical Sentence generation. In Proc. of NAACL. pp. 170-177.
14. Langkilde-Geary I. 2002a. An Empirical Verification of Coverage and Correctness for a General-Purpose Sentence Generator. In Proc. of INLG. pp.17-24.
15. Langkilde-Geary, I. 2002b. A Foundation for General-purpose Natural Language Generation: Sentence Realization Using Probabilistic Models of Language. PhD Thesis, University of Southern California.
16. Langkilde I., Knight K. 1998a. The practical value of n-grams in generation. In Proc. of 9th International Workshop on NLG. pp. 248-255.
17. Langkilde I., Knight K. 1998b. Generation that exploits corpus-based statistical knowledge. In Proc. of ACL and COLING. pp. 704-710.
18. McCallum A., Freitag D., & Pereira F. 2000. „Maximum Entropy Markov Models for Information Extraction and Segmentation.” In Proc. Of ICML-2000.
19. Papineni, K.A., Roukos, S., Ward, T., and Zhu, W.J. 2001. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. IBM Technical Report RC22176 (W0109-022).
20. Reiter E. and Dale R. 2000. Building natural language generation systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Ringger E., Gamon M., Smets M., Corston-Oliver S. and Moore R. 2003 Linguistically informed models of constituent structure for ordering in sentence realization. Microsoft Research technical report MSR-TR-2003-54.
22. Smets M., Gamon M., Corston-Oliver S. and Ringger E. (2003) The adaptation of a machine-learned sentence realization system to French. In Proceedings of EACL.