Dependency based Chinese sentence realization

ACL-IJCNLP 2009 - Joint Conf. of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 4th Int. Joint Conf. on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, Proceedings of the Conf.

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 809-816

  He, Wei ^a   Wang, Haifeng ^b   Guo, Yuqing ^b   Liu, Ting ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Toshiba China Co Ltd   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BLEU SCORES; CHINESE SENTENCE; DEPENDENCY RELATION; DEPENDENCY STRUCTURES; FEATURE FUNCTION; GRAMMAR RULES; LOGLINEAR MODEL; RELATIVE ORDER;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053401806     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1690219.1690260     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Srinivas Bangalore and Owen Rambow. 2000. Exploiting a Probabilistic Hierarchical Model for Generation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 42-48. Saarbrücken, Germany.
2. Aoife Cahill and Josef van Genabith. 2006. Robust PCFG-Based Generation Using Automatically Acquired LFG Approximations. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1033-1040. Sydney, Australia.
3. Aoife Cahill, Martin Forst and Christian Rohrer. 2007. Stochastic Realisation Ranking for a Free Word Order language. In Proceedings of 11th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 17-24. Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany.
4. John Carroll, Ann Copestake, Dan Flickinger, and Victor Poznanski. 1999. An Efficient Chart Generator for (Semi-)Lexicalist Grammars. In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 86-95, Toulouse.
5. Michael A. Covington. 2001. A Fundamental Algorithm for Dependency Parsing. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACMSoutheast Conference, pages 95-102.
6. Dick Crouch, Mary Dalrymple, Ron Kaplan, Tracy King, John Maxwell, and Paula Newman. 2007. XLE documentation. Palo Alto Research Center, CA.
7. Katja Filippova and Michael Strube. 2007. Generating Constituent Order in German Clauses. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 320-327. Prague, Czech Republic.
8. Yuqing Guo, Haifeng Wang and Josef van Genabith. 2008. Dependency-Based N-Gram Models for General Purpose Sentence Realisation. In Proceedings of the 22th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 297-304. Manchester, UK.
9. Deirdre Hogan, Conor Cafferkey, Aoife Cahill and Josef van Genabith. 2007. Exploiting Multi-Word Units in History-Based Probabilistic Generation. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and CoNLL, pages 267-276. Prague, Czech Republic.
10. Mel'čuk Igor. 1988. Dependency syntax: Theory and practice. In Suny Series in Linguistics. State University of New York Press, New York, USA.
11. Irene Langkilde. 2000. Forest-Based Statistical Sentence Generation. In Proceedings of 1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 170-177. Seattle, WA.
12. Irene Langkilde. 2002. An Empirical Verification of Coverage and Correctness for a General-Purpose Sentence Generator. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pages 17-24. New York, USA.
13. Ting Liu, Jinshan Ma, and Sheng Li. 2006a. Building a Dependency Treebank for Improving Chinese Parser. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing, 16(4): 207-224.
14. Ting Liu, Jinshan Ma, Huijia Zhu, and Sheng Li. 2006b. Dependency Parsing Based on Dynamic Local Optimization. In Proceedings of CoNLL-X, pages 211-215, New York, USA.
15. Hiroko Nakanishi, Yusuke Miyao and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2005. Probabilistic Models for Disambiguation of an HPSG-Based Chart Generator. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Parsing Technology, pages 93-102. Vancouver, British Columbia.
16. Franz Josef Och. 2003. Minimum Error Rate Training in Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 160-167, Sapporo, Japan.
17. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311-318. Philadelphia, PA.
18. Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 2000. Trainable Methods for Natural Language Generation. In Proceedings of North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 194-201. Seattle, WA.
19. Erik Velldal and Stephan Oepen. 2005. Maximum Entropy Models for Realization Ranking. In Proceedings of the 10th Machine Translation Summit, pages 109-116. Phuket, Thailand,
20. Stephen Wan, Mark Dras, Robert Dale, Cécile Paris. 2009. Improving Grammaticality in Statistical Sentence Generation: Introducing a Dependency Spanning Tree Algorithm with an Argument Satisfaction Model. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL, pages 852-860. Athens, Greece.
21. Michael White. 2004. Reining in CCG Chart Realization. In Proceedings of the third International Natural Language Generation Conference, pages 182-191. Hampshire, UK.
22. Michael White, Rajakrishnan Rajkumar and Scott Martin. 2007. Towards Broad Coverage Surface Realization with CCG. In Proceedings of the Machine Translation Summit XI Workshop, pages 22-30. Copenhagen, Danmark.