Evolution and applications of plant pathway resources and databases

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 530-544

  Sucaet, Yves ^a,b   Deva, Taru ^c  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TROY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Applications of integration; Database integration; Plant pathway databases

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PLANTS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 80053186137     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbq083     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Bader GD, Cary MP, Sander C. Pathguide: a pathway resource list. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D504-6.
2. Korc M. Pathways for aberrant angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer 2003;2:8.
3. Tsiantis M, Brown MI, Skibinski G, et al. Disruption of auxin transport is associated with aberrant leaf development in maize. Plant Physiol 1999;121:1163-8.
4. Kelley BP, Sharan R, Karp RM, et al. Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100: 11394-9.
5. Galperin MY, Koonin EV. Who's your neighbor? New computational approaches for functional genomics. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:609-13.
6. Bumgarner RE, Yeung KY. Methods for the inference of biological pathways and networks. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 541:225-45.
7. Pradines J, Rudolph-Owen L, Hunter J, et al. Detection of activity centers in cellular pathways using transcript profiling. J Biopharm Stat 2004;14:701-21.
8. Apic G, Ignjatovic T, Boyer S, et al. Illuminating drug discovery with biological pathways. FEBS Lett 2005;579: 1872-7.
9. Schreiber SL. Target-oriented and diversity-oriented organic synthesis in drug discovery. Science 2000;287: 1964-9.
10. Dixon N, Duncan JN, Geerlings T, et al. Reengineering orthogonally selective riboswitches. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:2830-5.
11. Mueller LA, Zhang P, Rhee SY. AraCyc: a biochemical pathway database for Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2003;132: 453-60.
12. Huang YJ, Hang D, Lu LJ, et al. Targeting the human cancer pathway protein interaction network by structural genomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008;7:2048-60.
13. Lynn DJ, Winsor GL, Chan C, et al. InnateDB: facilitating systems-level analyses of the mammalian innate immune response. Mol Syst Biol 2008;4:218.
14. Caspi R, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, et al. The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D623-31.
15. Liang C, Jaiswal P, Hebbard C, et al. Gramene: a growing plant comparative genomics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D947-53.
16. Davuluri RV, Sun H, Palaniswamy SK, et al. AGRIS: Arabidopsis gene regulatory information server, an information resource of Arabidopsis cis-regulatory elements and transcription factors. BMC Bioinformatics 2003;4:25.
17. Matys V, Fricke E, Geffers R, et al. TRANSFAC: transcriptional regulation, from patterns to profiles. NucleicAcidsRes 2003;31:374-8.
18. Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, etal. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:325-7.
19. Guo AY, Chen X, Gao G, et al. PlantTFDB: a comprehensive plant transcription factor database. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D966-9.
20. Bulow L, Steffens NO, Galuschka C, et al. AthaMap: from in silico data to real transcription factor binding sites. In Silico Biol 2006;6:243-52.
21. Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, et al. A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 2003;302:249-55.
22. Cui J, Li P, Li G, et al. AtPID: Arabidopsis thaliana protein interactome database-an integrative platform for plant systems biology. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D999-1008.
23. Aranda B, Achuthan P, Alam-Faruque Y, et al. The IntAct molecular interaction database in (2010). Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:D525-31.
24. Lin M, Shen X, Chen X. PAIR: the predicted Arabidopsis interactome resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2011. [Epub ahead of print 2010].
25. Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Stark M, et al. STRING 8-a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:D412-6.
26. Elkon R, Vesterman R, Amit N, et al. SPIKE-a database, visualization and analysis tool of cellular signaling pathways. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:110.
27. Button DK, Gartland KM, Ball LD, et al. DRASTIC- INSIGHTS: querying information in a plant gene expression database. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D712-6.
28. Shameer K, Ambika S, Varghese SM, et al. STIFDB-Arabidopsis Stress Responsive Transcription Factor DataBase. IntJ Plant Genomics 2009;2009:583429.
29. Bulow L, Schindler M, Choi C, et al. PathoPlant: a database on plant-pathogen interactions. In Silico Biol 2004;4: 529-36.
30. Bulow L, Schindler M, Hehl R. PathoPlant: a platform for microarray expression data to analyze co-regulated genes involved in plant defense responses. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:D841-5.
31. Rodriguez MC, Petersen M, Mundy J. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants. AnnuRev Plant Biol 2010; 61:621-49.
32. Lam HM, Chiu J, Hsieh MH, et al. Glutamate-receptor genes in plants. Nature 1998;396:125-6.
33. Kim SA, Kwak JM, Jae SK, et al. Overexpression of the AtGluR2 gene encoding an Arabidopsis homolog of mammalian glutamate receptors impairs calcium utilization and sensitivity to ionic stress in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Physiol 2001;42:74-84.
34. Kang J, Turano FJ. The putative glutamate receptor 1.1 (AtGLR1.1) functions as a regulator of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:6872-7.
35. Kang J, Mehta S, Turano FJ. The putative glutamate receptor 1.1 (AtGLR1.1) in Arabidopsis thaliana regulates abscisic acid biosynthesis and signaling to control development and water loss. Plant Cell Physiol 2004;45:1380-9.
36. Li J, Zhu S, Song X, et al. A rice glutamate receptor-like gene is critical for the division and survival of individual cells in the root apical meristem. Plant Cell 2006;18:340-9.
37. Brenner ED, Martinez-Barboza N, Clark AP, et al. Arabidopsis mutants resistant to S(+)-beta-methyl-alpha, beta-diaminopropionic acid, a cycad-derived glutamate receptor agonist. Plant Physiol 2000;124:1615-24.
38. Kang S, Kim HB, Lee H, et al. Overexpression in Arabidopsis of a plasma membrane-targeting glutamate receptor from small radish increases glutamate-mediated Ca2+ influx and delays fungal infection. Mol Cells 2006; 21:418-27.
39. Bolouri-Moghaddam MR, Le Roy K, Xiang L, et al. Sugar signalling and antioxidant network connections in plant cells. FEBS J 2010;277:2022-37.
40. Chory J. Light signal transduction: an infinite spectrum of possibilities. Plant J 2010;61:982-991.
41. Chung HS, Niu Y, Browse J, et al. Top hits in contemporary JAZ: an update on jasmonate signaling. Phytochemistry 2009;70:1547-59.
42. Jia M, Choi SY, Reiners D, et al. MetNetGE: interactive views of biological networks and ontologies. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:469.
43. Dahlquist KD, Salomonis N, Vranizan K, et al. GenMAPP, a new tool for viewing and analyzing microarray data on biological pathways. Nat Genet 2002;31:19-20.
44. Gehlenborg N, O'Donoghue SI, Baliga NS, et al. Visualization of omics data for systems biology. Nat Methods 2010;7:S56-68.
45. Suderman M, Hallett M. Tools for visually exploring biological networks. Bioinformatics 2007;23:2651-9.
46. Saraiya P, North C, Duca K. Visualizing biological pathways: requirements analysis, systems evaluation and research agenda. Inf Vis 2005;4:191-205.
47. Cary MP, Bader GD, Sander C. Pathway information for systems biology. FEBS Lett 2005;579:1815-20.
48. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 2003;19:524-31.
49. Luciano JS. PAX of mind for pathway researchers. Drug Discov Today 2005;10:937-42.
50. Wurtele ES, Li L, Berleant D, et al. MetNet: Systems Biology Software for Arabidopsis. In: Nikolau BJ, Wurtele ES, (eds). Concepts in Plant Metabolomics. Springer, 2007;145-58.
51. Hermjakob H, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Bader G, et al. The HUPO PSI's molecular interaction format-a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data. Nat Biotechnol 2004;22:177-83.
52. Lloyd CM, Halstead MD, Nielsen PF. CellML: its future, present and past. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2004;85:433-50.
53. Liao YM, Ghanadan H. The chemical markup language. Anal Chem 2002;74:389A-90A.
54. Hanisch D, Zimmer R, Lengauer T. ProML-the protein markup language for specification of protein sequences, structures and families. In Silico Biol 2002;2:313-24.
55. Spellman PT, Miller M, Stewart J, et al. Design and implementation of microarray gene expression markup language (MAGE-ML). Genome Biol 2002;3: RESEARCH0046.
56. Taubert J, Sieren KP, Hindle M, et al. The OXL format for the exchange of integrated datasets. J Integr Bioinf 2007;4: 62-75.
57. Sucaet Y, Wurtele ES. Met Net API: A flexible method to access and manipulate biological network data from Met Net. BMC Res Notes 2010;3:312.
58. Heath AP, Kavraki LE. Computational challenges in systems biology. Comput Sci Rev 2009;3:1-17.
59. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:27-30.
60. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Furumichi M, et al. KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:D355-60.
61. Lysenko A, Hindle MM, Taubert J, et al. Data integration for plant genomics-exemplars from the integration of Arabidopsis thaliana databases. Brief Bioinform 2009;10: 676-93.
62. Mentzen WI, Peng J, Ransom N, et al. Articulation of three core metabolic processes in Arabidopsis: fatty acid biosynthesis, leucine catabolism and starch metabolism. BMC Plant Biol 2008;8:76.
63. Beisson F, Koo AJ, Ruuska S, et al. Arabidopsis genes involved in acyl lipid metabolism. A 2003 census of the candidates, a study of the distribution of expressed sequence tags in organs, and a web-based database. Plant Physiol 2003; 132:681-97.
64. de Oliveira Dal'Molin CG, Quek LE, Palfreyman RW, et al. AraGEM, a genome-scale reconstruction of the primary metabolic network in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2010; 152:579-89.
65. Reumann S, Ma C, Lemke S, et al. AraPerox. A database of putative Arabidopsis proteins from plant peroxisomes. Plant Physiol 2004;136:2587-608.
66. Poole RL. The TAIR database. MethodsMol Biol 2007;406: 179-212.
67. Grant MR, Jones JD. Hormone (dis)harmony moulds plant health and disease. Science 2009;324:750-752.
68. Rasche A, Al-Hasani H, Herwig R. Meta-analysis approach identifies candidate genes and associated molecular networks for type-2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:310.
69. Matthews L, Gopinath G, Gillespie M, et al. Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:D619-22.
70. Karp PD, Ouzounis CA, Moore-Kochlacs C, et al. Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/ genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:6083-9.
71. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000;25:25-9.
72. de Chassey B, Navratil V, Tafforeau L, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection protein network. Mol Syst Biol 2008;4:230.
73. Bader GD, Betel D, Hogue CW. BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31: 248-50.
74. Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, et al. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D535-9.
75. Xenarios I, Salwinski L, Duan XJ, etal. DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30: 303-5.
76. Lu Z, Cohen KB, Hunter L. GeneRIF quality assurance as summary revision. Pac Symp Biocomput 2007;269-80.
77. Chatr-aryamontri A, Ceol A, Palazzi LM, et al. MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35: D572-4.
78. Neerincx PB, Leunissen JA. Evolution of web services in bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform 2005;6:178-188.
79. Schwab W. Metabolome diversity: too few genes, too many metabolites? Phytochemistry 2003;62:837-49.
80. Tsesmetzis N, Couchman M, Higgins J, et al. Arabidopsis reactome: a foundation knowledgebase for plant systems biology. Plant Cell 2008;20:1426-36.
81. De Bodt S, Carvajal D, Hollunder J, et al. CORNET: a user-friendly tool for data mining and integration. Plant Physiol 2010;152:1167-79.
82. Barrett T, Edgar R. Gene expression omnibus: microarray data storage, submission, retrieval, and analysis. Methods Enzymol 2006;411:352-69.
83. Bruskiewich R, Coe EH, Jaiswal P, etal. The plant ontology consortium and plant ontologies. Comp Funct Genomics 2002;3:137-42.
84. Avraham S, Tung CW, Ilic K, et al. The Plant Ontology Database: a community resource for plant structure and developmental stages controlled vocabulary and annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D449-54.
85. Ilic K, Kellogg EA, Jaiswal P, et al. The plant structure ontology, a unified vocabulary of anatomy and morphology of a flowering plant. Plant Physiol 2007;143:587-99.
86. Whetzel PL, Parkinson H, Causton HC, et al. The MGED Ontology: a resource for semantics-based description of microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2006;22:866-73.
87. Geisler-Lee J, O'Toole N, Ammar R, et al. A predicted interactome for Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2007;145:317-29.
88. De Bodt S, Proost S, Vandepoele K, et al. Predicting protein-protein interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana through integration of orthology, gene ontology and co-expression. BMC Genomics 2009;10:288.
89. Heazlewood JL, Verboom RE, Tonti-Filippini J, et al. SUBA: the Arabidopsis Subcellular Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:D213-8.
90. Bannai H, Tamada Y, Maruyama O, et al. Extensive feature detection of N-terminal protein sorting signals. Bioinformatics 2002;18:298-305.
91. Nair R, Rost B. Mimicking cellular sorting improves prediction of subcellular localization. J Mol Biol 2005;348: 85-100.
92. Guda C, Fahy E, Subramaniam S. MITOPRED: a genome-scale method for prediction of nucleus-encoded mitochondrial proteins. Bioinformatics 2004;20:1785-94.
93. Claros MG. MitoProt, a Macintosh application for studying mitochondrial proteins. Comput Appl Biosci 1995;11:441-7.
94. Hoglund A, Donnes P, Blum T, et al. MultiLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using N-terminal targeting sequences, sequence motifs and amino acid composition. Bioinformatics 2006;22:1158-65.
95. Emanuelsson O, Elofsson A, von Heijne G, et al. In silico prediction of the peroxisomal proteome in fungi, plants and animals. J Mol Biol 2003;330:443-56.
96. Small I, Peeters N, Legeai F, et al. Predotar: A tool for rapidly screening proteomes for N-terminal targeting sequences. Proteomics 2004;4:1581-90.
97. Chen H, Huang N, Sun Z. SubLoc: a server/client suite for protein subcellular location based on SOAP. Bioinformatics 2006;22:376-7.
98. Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, et al. Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat Protoc 2007;2:953-71.
99. Horton P, Park KJ, Obayashi T, et al. WoLF PSORT: protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35: W585-7.
100. Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. Protein Eng 1999;12:3-9.
101. Bender A, van Dooren GG, Ralph SA, et al. Properties and prediction of mitochondrial transit peptides from Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2003; 132:59-66.
102. Schneider G, Fechner U. Advances in the prediction of protein targeting signals. Proteomics 2004;4:1571-80.
103. Kaundal R, Saini R, Zhao PX. Combining machine learning and homology-based approaches to accurately predict subcellular localization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2010; 154:36-54.
104. Kaundal R, Raghava GP. RSLpred: an integrative system for predicting subcellular localization of rice proteins combining compositional and evolutionary information. Proteomics 2009;9:2324-42.
105. Thimm O, Blasing O, Gibon Y, et al. MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J 2004;37:914-39.
106. Sun Q, Zybailov B, Majeran W, et al. PPDB, the Plant Proteomics Database at Cornell. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37: D969-74.
107. Heazlewood JL, Tonti-Filippini JS, Gout AM, et al. Experimental analysis of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial proteome highlights signaling and regulatory components, provides assessment of targeting prediction programs, and indicates plant-specific mitochondrial proteins. Plant Cell 2004;16:241-56.
108. Brown JW, Shaw PJ, Shaw P, et al. Arabidopsis nucleolar protein database (AtNoPDB). Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33: D633-6.
109. Kleffmann T, Hirsch-Hoffmann M, Gruissem W, et al. plprot: a comprehensive proteome database for different plastid types. Plant Cell Physiol 2006;47:432-6.
110. Chang A, Scheer M, Grote A, et al. BRENDA, AMENDA and FRENDA the enzyme information system: new content and tools in (2009). Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:D588-92.
111. Degtyarenko K, de Matos P, Ennis M, et al. ChEBI: a database and ontology for chemical entities of biological interest. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D344-50.
112. Wang Y, Xiao J, Suzek TO, et al. PubChem: a public information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:W623-33.
113. Sitzmann M, Filippov IV, Nicklaus MC. Internet resources integrating many small-molecule databases. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2008;19:1-9.
114. Van Hemert JL, Dickerson JA. PathwayAccess: CellDesigner plugins for pathway databases. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2345-6.
115. Grimplet J, Cramer GR, Dickerson JA, et al. VitisNet: "Omics" Integration through Grapevine Molecular Networks. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e8365.
116. Grafahrend-Belau E, Weise S, Koschutzki D, et al. MetaCrop: a detailed database of crop plant metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D954-8.
117. Lemer C, Antezana E, Couche F, et al. The aMAZE LightBench: a web interface to a relational database of cellular processes. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D443-8.
118. van Helden J, Naim A, Lemer C, et al. From molecular activities and processes to biological function. Brief Bioinform 2001;2:81-93.
119. D'Souza M, Glass EM, Syed MH, et al. Sentra: a database of signal transduction proteins for comparative genome analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:D271-3.
120. Selkov E, Basmanova S, Gaasterland T, et al. The metabolic pathway collection from EMP: the enzymes and metabolic pathways database. Nucleic Acids Res 1996;24:26-8.
121. Philippi S, Kohler J. Addressing the problems with life-science databases for traditional uses and systems biology. Nat Rev Genet 2006;7:482-8.
122. Chandras C, Weaver T, Zouberakis M, et al. Models for financial sustainability of biological databases and resources. Database 2009;106:17475-80.
123. Bastow R, Leonelli S. Sustainable digital infrastructure. EMBO Rep 2010;11:730-4.