The effectiveness and distribution of male primary teachers: Evidence from two Mexican states

International Journal of Educational Development

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 145-154

  Luschei, Thomas F ^a  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Male teachers; Mexico; Teacher distribution; Teacher effectiveness

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; GENDER ROLE; PRIMARY EDUCATION; STUDENT; TEACHING;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

EID: 80052888025     PISSN: 07380593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aguayo Quezada S. México a la mano: Guia elemental para entender a nuestro país 2003, Hechos Confiables, Mexico City.
2. Antos J.R., Rosen S. Discrimination in the market for public school teachers. Journal of Econometrics 1975, 3(2):123-150.
3. Atlas of North America, 2005. Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Burn E. Do boys need male primary teachers as positive role models?. Forum 2002, 44(1):33-40.
5. Carrington B. A quintessentially feminine domain? Student teachers' constructions of primary teaching as a career. Education Studies 2002, 28(3):287-303.
6. Chudgar A., Sankar V. The relationship between teacher gender and student achievement: evidence from five indian states. Compare 2008, 38(5):627-642.
7. Clotfelter C.T., Ladd H.F., Vigdor J. Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review 2005, 24(4):377-392.
8. Clotfelter C.T., Ladd H.F., Vigdor J.L. Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources 2006, XLI(4):778-820.
9. CONAPO Índices de Marginación, 2000 2001, CONAPO, Mexico City.
10. Cushman P. Year 13 male students' attitudes to primary school teaching as a career. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 2000, 35(2):223-230.
11. Cushman P. Let's hear it from the males: issues facing male primary teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 2005, 21:227-240.
12. Dee, T.S., 2005. Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 11660). NBER, Washington, DC.
13. Dee T.S. The why chromosome: how a teacher's gender affects boys and girls. Education Next 2006, 4:69-75.
14. Dee T.S. Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources 2007, XLII(3):528-554.
15. England P. Devaluation and the pay of comparable male and female occupations. The Inequality Reader: Contemporary and Foundational Readings in Race, Class, and Gender 2007, 352-356. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. D. Grusky, S. Szelenyi (Eds.).
16. England P., Allison P., Wu Y. Does bad pay cause occupations to feminize. Does feminization reduce pay, and How can we tell with longitudinal data?. Social Science Research 2007, 36(3):1237-1256.
17. Goldhaber D.D., Brewer D.J. Why don't schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. Journal of Human Resources 1997, 32(3):505-523.
18. Goldhaber D.D., Brewer D.J., Anderson D.J. A three-way error components analysis of educational productivity. Education Economics 1999, 7(3):199-208.
19. Greene W.H. Econometric Aanalysis 2003, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 5th ed.
20. Guevara M., González L.E. Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers: Country Background Report for Mexico 2004, OECD, Paris, France.
21. Hanushek E.A. Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation using micro data. The American Economic Review 1971, 61(2):280-288.
22. Hanushek E.A. Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. The Journal of Human Resources 1979, 14(3):351-388.
23. Hanushek E.A., Kain J.F., Rivkin S.G. The revolving door. Education Next 2004, 4(1):76-82.
24. Harbison R.W., Hanushek E.A. Educational Performance of the Poor: Lessons from Rural Northeast Brazil 1992, Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación [INEE], 2003. La calidad de la educación básica en México: Primer informe anual 2003. INEE, Mexico City.
26. Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática [INEGI)] Mujeres y hombres en México 2003, INEGI, Aguascalientes, México.
27. Lankford H., Loeb S., Wyckoff J. Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: a descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2002, 24(1):37-62.
28. Loeb S., Page M. Examining the link between teacher wages and student outcomes: the importance of alternative labor market opportunities and non-pecuniary variation. Review of Economics and Statistics 2000, 82(3):393-408.
29. Lortie D.C. Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study 1975, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
30. McEwan P., Carnoy M. The effectiveness and efficiency of private schools in Chile's voucher system. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2000, 22(3):213-239.
31. Mills M., Martino W., Lingard B. Attracting, recruiting and retaining male teachers: policy issues in the male teacher debate. British Journal of Sociology 2004, 25(3):355-369.
32. National Education Association [NEA], 2003. Wanted: More male teachers. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://www.nea.org/teachershortage/03malefactsheet.html.
33. OECD Learning for Tomorrow's World: First Results from PISA 2003 2004, OECD Publications, Paris.
34. OECD Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS 2009, OECD, Paris.
35. Ortiz Jiménez M.B. Carrera Magisterial: Un proyecto de desarrollo professional. (Cuadernos de Discusión No. 12) 2003, SEP, Mexico.
36. Rivkin S.G., Hanushek E.A., Kain J.F. Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica 2005, 73(2):417-458.
37. Rowden-Racette K. Endangered species. Teacher Magazine 2005, 17(November (3)):22-26.
38. Santibañez, L.M., 2002. Why We Should Care if Teachers Get A's: Impact on Student Achievement in Mexico. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation in International Comparative Education, Stanford University School of Education, Stanford, California.
39. Santibañez L.M. Why we should care if teachers get A's: impact on student achievement in Mexico. Economics of Education Review 2006, 25:510-520.
40. Santibañez L., Vernez G., Razquin P. Education in Mexico: Challenges and opportunities 2005, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
41. Santibañez L.M., Martínez J.F., Datar A., McEwan P.J., Setodji C.M., Basurto-Dávila R. Breaking Ground: Analysis of the Assessment System and Impact of Mexico's Teacher Incentive Program Carrera Magisterial 2007, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
42. Secretaría de Educación Pública [SEP] Lineamientos Generales de Carrera Magisterial 1998, SEP, Mexico City.
43. Strizek, G.A., Pittsonberger, J.L., Riordan, K.E., Lyter, D.M., Orlofsky, G.F., 2006. Characteristics of Schools, Districts, Teachers, Principals, and School Libraries in the United States: 2003-04 Schools and Staffing Survey (NCES 2006-313 Revised). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
44. Vidal R., Díaz M.A. Resultados de Las Pruebas PISA 2000 y 2003 en México: Habilidades para La Vida en Estudiantes de 15 Años 2004, INEE, Mexico City.
45. Wooldridge J.M. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 2000, South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH. first ed.