LincRNAs act in the circuitry controlling pluripotency and differentiation

Nature

Volumn 477, Issue 7364, 2011, Pages 295-300

  Guttman, Mitchell ^a,b   Donaghey, Julie ^a   Carey, Bryce W ^b,c   Garber, Manuel ^a   Grenier, Jennifer K ^a   Munson, Glen ^a   Young, Geneva ^a   Lucas, Anne Bergstrom ^d   Ach, Robert ^d   Bruhn, Laurakay ^d   Yang, Xiaoping ^a   Amit, Ido ^a   Meissner, Alexander ^a,e   Regev, Aviv ^a,b   Rinn, John L ^a,e   Root, David E ^a   Lander, Eric S ^a,b,f  

^a BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^d AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^e Massachusetts General Hospital   (United States)

^f HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; GERM CELL; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PROTEIN; RNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UPREGULATION;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CHROMATIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; MICE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PROTEIN BINDING; RNA, UNTRANSLATED; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 80052869283     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature10398     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. The FANTOM Consortium. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 309, 1559-1563 (2005).
2. Guttman, M. et al. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 458, 223-227 (2009).
3. Guttman, M. et al. Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs. Nature Biotechnol. 28, 503-510 (2010).
4. Khalil, A. M. et al. Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11667-11672 (2009).
5. Ponjavic, J., Ponting, C. P. & Lunter, G. Functionality or transcriptional noise? Evidence for selection within long noncoding RNAs. Genome Res. 17, 556-565 (2007). (Pubitemid 46715505)
6. Mattick, J. S. The genetic signatures of noncoding RNAs. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000459 (2009).
7. Koziol, M. J. & Rinn, J. L. RNA traffic control of chromatin complexes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 142-148 (2010).
8. DeSanta, F. et al. A large fraction of extragenicRNA pol II transcription sites overlap enhancers. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000384 (2010).
9. Kim, T. K. et al. Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers. Nature 465, 182-187 (2010).
10. Ebisuya, M., Yamamoto, T., Nakajima, M. & Nishida, E. Ripples from neighbouring transcription. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 1106-1113 (2008).
11. Ørom, U.A. et al. Long noncodingRNAs with enhancer-like function inhumancells. Cell 143, 46-58 (2010).
12. Huarte, M. et al. Alarge intergenic noncodingRNAinduced byp53mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell 142, 409-419 (2010).
13. Rinn, J. L. et al. Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell 129, 1311-1323 (2007). (Pubitemid 46962090)
14. Smith, A. G. Embryo-derived stemcells: of mice and men. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 435-462 (2001).
15. Jaenisch, R. & Young, R. Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell 132, 567-582 (2008). (Pubitemid 351253686)
16. Chen, X. et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1106-1117 (2008). (Pubitemid 351787745)
17. Ivanova, N. et al. Dissecting self-renewal in stemcells withRNA interference. Nature 442, 533-538 (2006). (Pubitemid 44167907)
18. Boyer, L. A. et al. Polycombcomplexes repress developmental regulators inmurine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441, 349-353 (2006). (Pubitemid 44050199)
19. Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315-326 (2006).
20. Fazzio, T. G., Huff, J. T. & Panning, B. An RNAi screen of chromatin proteins identifies Tip60-p400 as a regulator of embryonic stem cell identity. Cell 134, 162-174 (2008). (Pubitemid 351905738)
21. Bilodeau, S., Kagey, M. H., Frampton, G. M., Rahl, P. B. & Young, R. A. SetDB1 contributes to repression of genes encoding developmental regulators and maintenance of ES cell state. Genes Dev. 23, 2484-2489 (2009).
22. Moffat, J. et al. A lentiviral RNAi library for human and mouse genes applied to an arrayed viral high-content screen. Cell 124, 1283-1298 (2006).
23. Hu, G. et al. A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies a new transcriptional module required for self-renewal. Genes Dev. 23, 837-848 (2009).
24. Plath, K., Mlynarczyk-Evans, S., Nusinow, D. A. & Panning, B. Xist RNA and the mechanismof X chromosome inactivation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36, 233-278 (2002). (Pubitemid 36109190)
25. Koerner, M. V., Pauler, F. M., Huang, R. & Barlow, D. P. The function of non-coding RNAs in genomic imprinting. Development 136, 1771-1783 (2009).
26. Ponjavic, J., Oliver, P. L., Lunter, G.& Ponting, C. P. Genomic and transcriptional colocalization of protein-coding and long non-coding RNA pairs in the developing brain. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000617 (2009).
27. Sproul, D., Gilbert, N. & Bickmore, W. A. The role of chromatin structure in regulating the expression of clustered genes. Nature Rev. Genet. 6, 775-781 (2005). (Pubitemid 41400835)
28. Silva, J. et al. Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138, 722-737 (2009).
29. Chambers, I. et al. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 113, 643-655 (2003). (Pubitemid 36694189)
30. Mitsui, K. et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113, 631-642 (2003). (Pubitemid 36694188)
31. Brambrink, T. et al. Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2, 151-159 (2008). (Pubitemid 351168714)
32. Sherwood, R. I. et al. Prospective isolation and global gene expression analysis of definitive and visceral endoderm. Dev. Biol. 304, 541-555 (2007). (Pubitemid 46527567)
33. Aiba, K. et al. Defining developmental potency and cell lineage trajectories by expression profiling of differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. DNA Res. 16, 73-80 (2009).
34. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545-15550 (2005). (Pubitemid 41528093)
35. Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J. & Smith, A. G. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nature Genet. 24, 372-376 (2000). (Pubitemid 30187435)
36. Pasini, D., Bracken, A. P., Hansen, J. B., Capillo, M. & Helin, K. The polycomb group proteinSuz12is required forembryonic stemcell differentiation.Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 3769-3779 (2007). (Pubitemid 46726184)
37. Jiang, H. et al. Role for Dpy-30 in ES cell-fate specification by regulation of H3K4 methylation within bivalent domains. Cell 144, 513-525 (2011).
38. Marson, A. et al.Connecting microRNAgenes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 134, 521-533 (2008).
39. Kunarso, G. et al. Transposable elements have rewired the core regulatory network of human embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 42, 631-634 (2010).
40. Jiang, J. et al. A core Klf circuitry regulates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 353-360 (2008). (Pubitemid 351331023)
41. Geiss, G. K. et al. Direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression with colorcoded probe pairs. Nature Biotechnol. 26, 317-325 (2008). (Pubitemid 351355126)
42. Dey, B. K. et al. The histone demethylase KDM5b/JARID1b plays a role in cell fate decisions by blocking terminal differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 5312-5327 (2008).
43. Cloos, P. A., Christensen, J., Agger, K. & Helin, K. Erasing the methyl mark: histone demethylases at the center of cellular differentiation and disease. Genes Dev. 22, 1115-1140 (2008). (Pubitemid 351656572)
44. Zappulla, D. C. & Cech, T. R. Yeast telomerase RNA: a flexible scaffold for protein subunits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10024-10029 (2004). (Pubitemid 38891188)
45. Wutz, A., Rasmussen, T. P. & Jaenisch, R. Chromosomal silencing and localization aremediated by different domains of XistRNA.NatureGenet. 30,167-174(2002).
46. Tsai, M. C. et al. Long noncoding RNA as modular scaffold of histone modification complexes. Science 329, 689-693 (2010).
47. Meissner, A., Eminli, S. & Jaenisch, R. Derivation and manipulation of murine embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 482, 3-19 (2009).
48. Nichols, J. et al. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 95, 379-391 (1998). (Pubitemid 28507326)
49. Avilion, A. A. et al. Multipotent cell lineages in earlymouse development depend on SOX2 function. Genes Dev. 17, 126-140 (2003). (Pubitemid 36062514)
50. Niwa, H., Burdon, T., Chambers, I. & Smith, A. Self-renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is mediated via activation of STAT3. Genes Dev. 12, 2048-2060 (1998). (Pubitemid 28323878)
51. Nakatake, Y. et al. Klf4 cooperates with Oct3/4 and Sox2 to activate the Lefty1 core promoter in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 7772-7782 (2006). (Pubitemid 44547722)
52. Brons, I. G. et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448, 191-195 (2007). (Pubitemid 47067373)
53. Torres-Padilla, M. E., Parfitt, D. E., Kouzarides, T. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. Histone arginine methylation regulates pluripotency in the early mouse embryo. Nature 445, 214-218 (2007). (Pubitemid 46095726)
54. Gaspar-Maia, A. et al. Chd1 regulates open chromatin and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 460, 863-868 (2009).
55. Dejosez, M. et al. Ronin is essential for embryogenesis and the pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1162-1174 (2008). (Pubitemid 351852919)
56. Yuan, P. et al. Eset partners with Oct4 to restrict extraembryonic trophoblast lineage potential in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 23, 2507-2520 (2009).
57. Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T., Klimke, W. & Maglott, D. R. NCBI Reference Sequences: current status, policy and new initiatives. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D32-D36 (2009).
58. Yang, Y. H. et al. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e15 (2002).
59. Shen, X. et al. EZH1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements EZH2 in maintaining stemcell identity and executing pluripotency. Mol. Cell 32, 491-502 (2008).
60. Aiba, K. et al. Defining a developmental path to neural fate by global expression profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells and adult neural stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells 24, 889-895 (2006). (Pubitemid 44464722)
61. Ying, Q. L., Stavridis, M., Griffiths, D., Li, M. & Smith, A. Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 183-186 (2003). (Pubitemid 36188218)
62. Morrisey, E. E. et al. GATA6 regulates HNF4 and is required for differentiation of visceral endoderm in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 12, 3579-3590 (1998). (Pubitemid 28553248)
63. Bock, C. et al. Reference maps of human ES and iPS cell variation enable highthroughput characterization of pluripotent cell lines. Cell 144, 439-452 (2011).
64. Barbie, D. A. et al. Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRASdriven cancers require TBK1. Nature 462, 108-112 (2009).
65. Lamb, J. et al. The connectivity map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science 313, 1929-1935 (2006). (Pubitemid 44497995)
66. Langmead, B., Hansen, K. D. & Leek, J. T. Cloud-scale RNA-sequencing differential expression analysis with Myrna. Genome Biol. 11, R83 (2010).
67. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
68. Visel, A. et al. ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854-858 (2009).
69. Katz, Y., Wang, E. T., Airoldi, E. M. & Burge, C. B. Analysis and design of RNA sequencing experiments for identifying isoform regulation. Nature Methods 7, 1009-1015 (2010).
70. Licatalosi, D. D. et al. HITS-CLIP yields genome-wide insights into brain alternative RNA processing. Nature 456, 464-469 (2008). (Pubitemid 352759008)
71. Ule, J. et al. CLIP identifies Nova-regulatedRNA networks in the brain. Science 302, 1212-1215 (2003). (Pubitemid 37421026)
72. Wang, Z., Tollervey, J., Briese, M., Turner, D. & Ule, J. CLIP: construction of cDNA libraries for high-throughput sequencing from RNAs cross-linked to proteins in vivo. Methods 48, 287-293 (2009).