Perceptual consequences of face viewpoint adaptation: Face viewpoint aftereffect, changes of differential sensitivity to face view, and their relationship

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1-11

  Chen, Juan ^a   Yang, Hua ^a   Wang, Aobing ^a   Fang, Fang ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Aftereffect; Computational model; Discrimination; Face

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954682991     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.3.12     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Abbonizio, G., Langley, K., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2002). Contrast adaptation may enhance contrast discrimination. Spatial Vision, 16, 45-58. [PubMed]
2. Barlow, H. B. (1990). A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects. In C. Blakemore (Ed.), Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 363-375). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bex, P. J., Bedingham, S., & Hammett, S. T. (1999). Apparent speed and speed sensitivity during adaptation to motion. Journal of Optical Society of America A, 16, 2817-2814.
4. Bi, T., Su, J., Chen, J., & Fang, F. (2009). The role of gaze direction in face viewpoint aftereffect. Vision Research, 49, 2322-2327. [PubMed] [Article]
5. Blakemore, C., & Campbell, F. (1969). On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. The Journal of Physiology, 203, 237-260. [PubMed] [Article]
6. Clifford, C. W. G., & Wenderoth, P. (1999). Adaptation to temporal modulation can enhance differential speed sensitivity. Vision Research, 39, 4324-4332. [PubMed] [Article]
7. Clifford, C. W. G., Wenderoth, P., & Spehar, B. (2000). A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 267, 1705-1710. [PubMed] [Article]
8. Clifford, C. W. G., Wyatt, A. M., Arnold, D. H., Smith, S. T., & Wenderoth, P. (2001). Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination. Vision Research, 41, 151-159. [PubMed] [Article]
9. Desimone, R., Albright, T. D., Gross, C. G., & Bruce, C. (1984). Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 2051-2062. [PubMed] [Article]
10. De Souza, W. C., Eifuku, S., Tamura, R., Nishijo, H., & Ono, T. (2005). Differential characteristics of face neuron responses within the anterior superior temporal sulcus of macaques. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 1252-1266. [PubMed] [Article]
11. Dragoi, V., Sharma, J., Miller, E. K., & Sur, M. (2002). Dynamics of neuronal sensitivity in visual cortex and local feature discrimination. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 883-891. [PubMed]
12. Fang, F., & He, S. (2005). Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron, 45, 793-800. [PubMed]
13. Fang, F., Ijichi, K., & He, S. (2007). Transfer of the face viewpoint aftereffect from adaptation to different and inverted faces. Journal of Vision, 7(13):6, 1-9, http://journalofvision.org/7/13/6/, doi:10.1167/7.13.6. [PubMed] [Article]
14. Gibson, J. J., & Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, aftereffect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 453-467.
15. Gilbert, C. D., Sigman, M., & Crist, R. E. (2001). The neural basis of perceptual learning. Neuron, 31, 681-697. [PubMed]
16. Gilbert, C. D., & Wiesel, T. N. (1990). The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in primary visual cortex of the cat. Vision Research, 30, 1689-1701. [PubMed] [Article]
17. Goldstein, A. G. (1957). Judgments of visual velocity as a function of length of observation time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 457-461. [PubMed]
18. Greenlee, M. W., & Heitger, F. (1988). The functional role of contrast adaptation. Vision Research, 28, 791-797. [PubMed]
19. Greenlee, M. W., & Thomas, J. P. (1992). Effect of pattern adaptation on spatial frequency discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 9, 857-862. [PubMed]
20. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14-23. [PubMed] [Article]
21. Hol, K., & Treue, S. (2001). Different populations of neurons contribute to the detection and discrimination of visual motion. Vision Research, 41, 685-689. [PubMed] [Article]
22. Kohn, A., & Movshon, J. A. (2004). Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 764-772. [PubMed]
23. Krekelberg, B., van Wezel, R. J., & Albright, T. D. (2006). Adaptation in macaque MT reduces perceived speed and improves speed discrimination. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 255-270. [PubMed] [Article]
24. Kristjansson, A. (2001). Increased sensitivity to speed changes during adaptation to first-order, but not second-order, motion. Vision Research, 41, 1825-1832. [PubMed] [Article]
25. Langton, S. R. H. (2000). The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 53, 825-845. [PubMed]
26. Langton, S. R. H., Honeyman, H., & Tessler, E. (2004). The influence of head contour and nose angle on the perception of eye-gaze direction. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 752-771. [PubMed]
27. Laughlin, S. B. (1989). Coding efficiency and design in visual processing. In D. G. Stavenga & R. C. Hardie (Eds.), Facets of vision (pp. 213-234). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
28. Leopold, D. A., Bondar, I. V., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 442, 572-575. [PubMed]
29. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94. [PubMed]
30. Levinson, E., & Sekuler, R. (1976). Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion. Vision Research, 16, 779-781. [PubMed]
31. Li, L., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1993). The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1918-1929. [PubMed]
32. Liu, Y., Murray, S. O., & Jagadeesh, B. (2009). Time course and stimulus dependence of repetition-induced response suppression in inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 418-436. [PubMed] [Article]
33. Maatanen, L. M., & Koenderink, J. J. (1991). Contrast adaptation and contrast gain control. Experimental Brain Research, 87, 205-212. [PubMed]
34. Ng, M., Boynton, G. M., & Fine, I. (2008). Face adaptation does not improve performance on search or discrimination tasks. Journal of Vision, 8(1):1, 1-20, http://journalofvision.org/8/1/1/, doi:10.1167/8.1.1. [PubMed] [Article]
35. Ng, M., Ciaramitaro, V. M., Anstis, S., Boyton, G. M., & Fine, I. (2006). Selectivity for the configural cues that identify the gender, ethnicity, and identity of faces in human cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 19552-19557. [PubMed] [Article]
36. Nummenmaa, L., & Calder, A. J. (2009). Neural mechanisms of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 135-143. [PubMed] [Article]
37. Pallett, P. M., & MacLeod, D. I. (2007). Face discrimination does not rely on configural information [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):503, 503a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/503/, doi:10.1167/7.9.503.
38. Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W., & Benson, P. J. (1992). Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 335, 23-30. [PubMed] [Article]
39. Perrett, D. I., Oram, M. W., Harries, M. H., Bevan, R., Hietanen, J. K., Benson, P. J., et al. (1991). Viewer-centered and object-centered coding of heads in the macaque temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 159-173.
40. Perrett, D. I., Smith, P. A. J., Potter, D. D., Mistlin, A. J., Head, A. S., & Milner, A. D. (1985). Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 223, 293-317. [PubMed]
41. Phinney, R. E., Bowd, C., & Patterson, R. (1997). Direction-selective coding of stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion. Vision Research, 37, 865-869. [PubMed] [Article]
42. Pouget, A., Dayan, P., & Zemel, R. (2003). Inference and computation with population codes. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 26, 381-410. [PubMed]
43. Pouget, A., Zhang, K., Deneve, S., & Latham, P. E. (1998). Statistically efficient estimation using population coding. Neural Computation, 10, 373-401. [PubMed]
44. Regan, D., & Beverlay, K. I. (1983). Spatial frequency discrimination and detection: Comparison of post-adaptation threshold. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 73, 1684-1690.
45. Regan, D., & Beverlay, K. L. (1985). Postadaptation orientation discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 147-155. [PubMed]
46. Rhodes, G., & Jeffery, L. (2006). Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research, 46, 2977-2987. [PubMed]
47. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558-566. [PubMed]
48. Rhodes, G., Maloney, L. T., Turner, J., & Ewing, L. (2007). Adaptive face coding and discrimination around the average face. Vision Research, 47, 974-989. [PubMed] [Article]
49. Ricciardelli, P., & Driver, J. (2008). Effects of head orientation on gaze perception: How positive congruency effects can be reversed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 491-504. [PubMed]
50. Ross, J., Speed, H. D., & Morgan, M. J. (1993). The effects of adaptation and masking on incremental thresholds for contrast. Vision Research, 33, 2051-2056. [PubMed]
51. Ryu, J., & Chaudhuri, A. (2006). Representations of familiar and unfamiliar faces as revealed by viewpoint-aftereffects. Vision Research, 46, 4059-4063. [PubMed] [Article]
52. Sawamura, H., Orban, G. A., & Vogels, R. (2006). Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: A single-cell study of the FMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron, 49, 307-318. [PubMed]
53. Tsao, D. Y., & Freiwald, W. A. (2006). What's so special about the average face? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 391-393. [PubMed] [Article]
54. Vander Wyk, B. C., Hudac, C. M., Carter, E. J., Sobel, D. M., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2009). Action understanding in the superior temporal sulcus region. Psychological Science, 20, 771-777. [PubMed]
55. Verhoef, B. E., Kayaert, G., Franko, E., Vangeneugden, J., & Vogels, R. (2008). Stimulus similarity-contingent neural adaptation can be time and cortical area dependent. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10631-10640. [PubMed] [Article]
56. Watkins, D. W., & Berkley, M. A. (1974). The orientation selectivity of single neurons in cat striate cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 19, 433-446. [PubMed]
57. Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 113-120. [PubMed]
58. Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557-561. [PubMed]
59. Webster, M. A., & Maclin, O. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 647-653. [PubMed]
60. Webster, M. A., & Mollon, J. D. (1991). Change in colour appearance following post-receptoral adaptation. Nature, 349, 235-238.
61. Wenderoth, P., & Johnstone, S. (1987). Possible neural substrates for orientation analysis and perception. Perception, 16, 693-709. [PubMed]