Tilt aftereffects in a self-organizing model of the primary visual cortex

Neural Computation

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 1721-1740

  Bednar, James A ^a   Miikkulainen, Risto ^a  

^a University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; ORIENTATION; RETINA; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0034219384     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089976600300015321     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Barlow, H. B. (1990). A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects. In C. Blakemore (Ed.), Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 363-375). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bednar, J. A. (1997). Tilt aftereffects in a self-organizing model of the primary visual cortex. Master's thesis, The University of Texas at Austin. Technical Report A197-259.
3. Bednar, J. A., & Miikkulainen, R. (1998). Pattern-generator-driven development in self-organizing models. In J. M. Bower (Ed.), Computational neuroscience: Trends in research, 1998 (pp. 317-323). New York: Plenum.
4. Bosking, W. H., Zhang, Y., Schofield, B., & Fitzpatrick, D. (1997). Orientation selectivity and the arrangement of horizontal connections in tree shrew striate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(6), 2112-2127.
5. Campbell, F. W., & Maffei, L. (1971). The tilt aftereffect: A fresh look. Vision Research, 11, 833-840.
6. Carpenter, R. H. S., & Blakemore, C. (1973). Interactions between orientations in human vision. Experimental Brain Research, 18, 287-303.
7. Choe, Y., & Miikkulainen, R. (1998). Self-organization and segmentation in a laterally connected orientation map of spiking neurons. Neurocomputing, 21, 139-157.
8. Coltheart, M. (1971). Visual feature-analyzers and aftereffects of tilt and curvature. Psychological Review, 78, 114-121.
9. Dong, D. W. (1995). Associative decorrelation dynamics: A theory of self-organization and optimization in feedback networks. In G. Tesauro, D. S. Touretzky, & T. K. Leen (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 7 (pp. 925-932). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Field, D. J. (1994). What is the goal of sensory coding? Neural Computation, 6, 559-601.
11. Finlayson, P. G., & Cynader, M. S. (1995). Synaptic depression in visual cortex tissue slices: An in vitro model for cortical neuron adaptation. Experimental Brain Research, 106(1), 145-155.
12. Földiák, P. (1990). Forming sparse representations by local anti-Hebbian learning. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 165-170.
13. Fregnac, Y. (1996). Dynamics of functional connectivity in visual cortical networks: An overview. Journal of Physiology (Paris), 90, 113-139.
14. Geisler, W. S., & Albrecht, D. G. (1997). Visual cortex neurons in monkeys and cats: Detection, discrimination, and identification. Visual Neuroscience, 14(5), 897-919.
15. Gibson, J. J., & Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 453-467.
16. Gilbert, C. D. (1998). Adult cortical dynamics. Physiological Reviews, 78(2), 467-485.
17. Greenlee, M. W., & Magnussen, S. (1987). Saturation of the tilt aftereffect. Vision Research, 27(6), 1041-1043.
18. Grinvald, A., Lieke, E. E., Frostig, R. D., & Hildesheim, R. (1994). Cortical point-spread function and long-range lateral interactions revealed by real-time optical imaging of macaque monkey primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 2545-2568.
19. Hata, Y., Tsumoto, T., Sato, H., Hagihara, K., & Tamura, H. (1993). Development of local horizontal interactions in cat visual cortex studied by cross-correlation analysis. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 40-56.
20. Hirsch, J. A., & Gilbert, C. D. (1991). Synaptic physiology of horizontal connections in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1800-1809.
21. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-243.
22. Magnussen, S., & Johnsen, T. (1986). Temporal aspects of spatial adaptation: A study of the tilt aftereffect. Vision Research, 26(4), 661-672.
23. McLean, J., & Palmer, L. A. (1996). Contrast adaptation and excitatory amino acid receptors in cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 13(6), 1069-1087.
24. Miikkulainen, R., Bednar, J. A., Choe, Y., & Sirosh, J. (1997). Self-organization, plasticity, and low-level visual phenomena in a laterally connected map model of the primary visual cortex. In R. L. Goldstone, P. G. Schyns, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 36 (pp. 257-308). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Miller, K. D., & MacKay, D. J. C. (1994). The role of constraints in Hebbian learning. Neural Computation, 6, 100-126.
26. Mitchell, D. E., Muir, D. W. (1976). Does the tilt aftereffect occur in the oblique meridian? Vision Research, 16, 609-613.
27. Mundel, T., Dimitrov, A., & and Cowan, J. D. (1997). Visual cortex circuitry and orientation tuning. In M. C. Mozer, M. I. Jordan, & T. Petsche (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 9 (pp. 887-893). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Parker, A. J., & Newsome, W. T. (1998). Sense and the single neuron: Probing the physiology of perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 21, 227-277.
29. Rochester, N., Holland, J. H., Haibt, L. H., & Duda, W. L. (1956). Tests on a cell assembly theory of the action of the brain, using a large digital computer. Reprinted in J. A. Anderson & E. Rosenfeld (Eds.), 1998, Neurocomputing: Foundations of research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Shatz, C. J. (1990). Impulse activity and the patterning of connections during CNS development. Neuron, 5, 745-756.
31. Sirosh, J. (1995). A self-organizing neural network model of the primary visual cortex. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin. Technical Report AI95-237.
32. Sirosh, J., & Miikkulainen, R. (1994a). Cooperative self-organization of afferent and lateral connections in cortical maps. Biological Cybernetics, 71, 66-78.
33. Sirosh, J., & Miikkulainen, R. (1994b). Modeling cortical plasticity based on adapting lateral interaction. In J. M. Bower (Ed.), The neurobiology of computation: The Proceedings of the Third Annual Computation and Neural Systems Conference (pp. 305-310). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
34. Sirosh, J., & Miikkulainen, R. (1997). Topographic receptive fields and patterned lateral interaction in a self-organizing model of the primary visual cortex. Neural Computation, 9, 577-594.
35. Sirosh, J., Miikkulainen, R., & Bednar, J. A. (1996). Self-organization of orientation maps, lateral connections, and dynamic receptive fields in the primary visual cortex. In J. Sirosh, R. Miikkulainen, & Y. Choe (Eds.), Lateral interactions in the cortex: Structure and function. Austin, TX: UTCS Neural Networks Research Group. Available online at: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/ users/nn/web-pubs/htmlbook96.
36. Snippe, H. P. (1996). Parameter extraction from population codes: A critical assessment. Neural Computation, 8(3), 511-529.
37. Stemmler, M., Usher, M., & Niebur, E. (1995). Lateral interactions in primary visual cortex: A model bridging physiology and psychophysics. Science, 269, 1877-1880.
38. Tolhurst, D. J., & Thompson, P. G. (1975). Orientation illusions and aftereffects: Inhibition between channels. Vision Research, 15, 967-972.
39. Turrigiano, G. G. (1999). Homeostatic plasticity in neuronal networks: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Trends in Neuroscience, 22, 221-227.
40. Turrigiano, G., Abbott, L. F., & Marder, E. (1994). Activity-dependent changes in the intrinsic properties of cultured neurons. Science, 264, 974-977.
41. Turrigiano, G. G., Leslie, K. R., Desai, N. S., Rutherford, L. C., & Nelson, S. B. (1998). Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons. Nature, 391, 845-846.
42. van der Zwan, R., & Wenderoth, P. (1995). Mechanisms of purely subjective contour tilt aftereffects. Vision Research, 35(18), 2547-2557.
43. Vidyasagar, T. R. (1990). Pattern adaptation in cat visual cortex is a co-operative phenomenon. Neuroscience, 36, 175-179.
44. von der Malsburg, C. (1973). Self-organization of orientation-sensitive cells in the striate cortex. Kybernetik, 15, 85-100. Reprinted in J. A. Anderson & E. Rosenfeld (Eds.), 1988, Neurocomputing: Foundations of research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. von der Malsburg, C. (1973). Self-organization of orientation-sensitive cells in the striate cortex. Kybernetik, 15, 85-100. Reprinted in J. A. Anderson & E. Rosenfeld (Eds.), 1988, Neurocomputing: Foundations of research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. von der Malsburg, C. (1987). Synaptic plasticity as basis of brain organization. In J.-P. Changeux & M. Konishi (Eds.), The neural and molecular bases of learning (pp. 411-432). New York: Wiley.
47. Weliky, M., Kandler, K., Fitzpatrick, D., & Katz, L. C. (1995). Patterns of excitation and inhibition evoked by horizontal connections in visual cortex share a common relationship to orientation columns. Neuron, 15, 541-552.
48. Wenderoth, P., & Johnstone, S. (1988). The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions. Vision Research, 28, 301-312.
49. Wolfe, J. M., & O'Connell, K. M. (1986). Fatigue and structural change: Two consequences of visual pattern adaptation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 27(4), 538-543.
50. Zemel, R. S., Dayan, P., & Pouget, A. (1998). Probabilistic interpretation of population codes. Neural Computation, 10(2), 403-430.
51. Zucker, R. S. (1989). Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 12, 13-31.