Adaptation modulates the electrophysiological substrates of perceived facial distortion: Support for opponent coding

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 13, 2010, Pages 3743-3756

  Burkhardt, Alex ^a   Blaha, Leslie M ^a   Jurs, Bethany Schneider ^b   Rhodes, Gillian ^c   Jeffery, Linda ^c   Wyatte, Dean ^a   Delong, Jordan ^a   Busey, Tom ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STOUT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Aftereffects; Event related potential; Face processing

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 78149412482     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.016     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., Mccarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8:551-565.
2. Bentin S., Deouell L.Y. Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2000, 17:35-54.
3. Busey, T. A. (n.d.). The face machine [JAVA applet]. http://cognitrn.psych.indiana.edu/nsfgrant/FaceMachine/faceMachine.html.
4. Carandini M., Ferster D. A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. Science 1997, 276:949-952.
5. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
6. Dragoi V., Sharma J., Sur M. Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron 2000, 28(1):287-298.
7. Drucker D.M., Kerr W.T., Aguirre G.K. Distinguishing conjoint and independent neural tuning for stimulus features with fMRI adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 101(6):3310-3324.
8. Fang F., He S. Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron 2005, 45(5):793-800.
9. Gibson J.J. Adaptation after-effects and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1933, 16(1):1-31.
10. Graham N. Visual pattern analyzers 1989, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
11. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(1):14-23.
12. Halit H., de Haan M., Johnson M.H. Modulation of event-related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces. NeuroReport 2000, 11(9):1871-1875.
13. Itier R.J., Taylor M.J. N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14(2):132-142.
14. Kahn D.A., Harris A.M., Wolk D.A., Aguirre G.K. Temporally distinct neural coding of perceptual similarity and prototype bias. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(10):1-12.
15. Köhler W., Wallach H. Figural aftereffects: An investigation of visual processes. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1944, 88:269-357.
16. Kovács G., Cziraki C., Vidnyanszky Z., Schweinberger S.R., Greenlee M.W. Position-specific and position-invariant face aftereffects reflect the adaptation of different cortical areas. NeuroImage 2008, 43(1):156-164.
17. Kovács G., Zimmer M., Banko E., Harza I., Antal A., Vidnyanszky Z. Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16(5):742-753.
18. Kovács G., Zimmer M., Harza I., Antal A., Vidnyanszky Z. Position-specificity of facial adaptation. Neuroreport 2005, 16(17):1945-1949.
19. Kovács G., Zimmer M., Harza I., Vidnyanszky Z. Adaptation duration affects the spatial selectivity of facial aftereffects. Vision Research 2007, 47(25):3141-3149.
20. Krekelberg B., Boyton G.M., van Wezel R.J.A. Adaptation: From single cells to BOLD. Trends in Neurosciences 2006, 29(5):250-256.
21. Leopold D.A., O'toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(1):89-94.
22. Milivojevic B., Clapp W.C., Johnson B.W., Corballis M.C. Turn that frown upside down: ERP effects of thatcherization of misorientated faces. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:967-978.
23. Movshon J.A., Lennie P. Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurons. Nature 1979, 278:850-852.
24. Petersen S.E., Baker J.F., Allman J.M. Direction-specific adaptation in area MT of the owl monkey. Brain Research 1985, 346(1):146-150.
25. Regan D., Hamstra S.J. Shape discrimination and the judgment of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size. Vision Research 1992, 32:1845-1864.
26. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Clifford C.W., Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 2003, 14:558-566.
27. Rhodes G., Leopold D.A. Adaptive norm-based coding of face identity. Handbook of face perception 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford. A.J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M.H. Johnston, J.V. Haxby (Eds.).
28. Robbins R., Mckone E., Edwards M. Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: Adaptor position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(3):570-592.
29. Rossion B., Delvenne J.-F., Debatisse D., Goffaux V., Bruyer R., Crommelinck M., et al. Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: An event-related potentials study. Biological Psychology 1999, 50(3):173-189.
30. Rossion B., Gauthier I. How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 2000, 1(1):62-74.
31. Schweinberger S.R., Kloth N., Jenkins R. Are you looking at me? Neural correlates of gaze adaptation. NeuroReport 2007, 18(7):693-696.
32. Stahl J., Wiese H., Schweinberger S.R. Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport 2008, 19(5):583-587.
33. Susilo T., Mckone E., Edwards M. What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation. Vision Research 2010, 50(3):300-314.
34. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1991, 43(2):161-204.
35. Valentine T., Bruce V. The effects of distinctiveness in recognizing and classifying faces. Perception 1986, 15(5):525-535.
36. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 2004, 428(6982):557-561.
37. Webster M.A., Maclin O.H. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6(4):647-653.
38. Wiese H., Schweinberger S.R., Hansen K. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2973-2985.
39. Yamashita J.A., Hardy J.L., De Valois K.K., Webster M.A. Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:420-437.
40. Yambor W.S., Draper B.A., Beveridge J.R. Analyzing PCA-based face recognition algorithms: Eigenvector selection and distance measures. Empirical Evaluation Methods in Computer Vision 2002, World Scientific Press, Singapore. H.I. Christensen, P.J. Phillips (Eds.).
41. Zhao L., Chubb C. The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research 2001, 41:2979-2994.