Standardized video-assisted retroperitoneal minilaparotomy surgery for 615 living donor nephrectomies

Transplant International

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 973-983

  Choi, Kyung Hwa ^a   Yang, Seung Choul ^a   Lee, Seung Ryeol ^b   Jeon, Hwang Gyun ^b   Kim, Dong Suk ^c   Joo, Dong Jin ^d   Kim, Myoung Soo ^d   Kim, Yu Seun ^d   Kim, Soon Ii ^d   Han, Woong Kyu ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b CHA University   (South Korea)

^c Catholic Kwandong University   (South Korea)

^d Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

laparotomy; live donor; minimally invasive surgical procedures; nephrectomy; retroperitoneal space

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; KIDNEY GRAFT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; ORGAN DONOR; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VIDEO ASSISTED MINILAPAROTOMY LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY;

ADULT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; ISCHEMIA; LAPAROTOMY; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 80052550278     PISSN: 09340874     EISSN: 14322277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01295.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Davis CL,. How to increase living donation-global strategies to meet the organ need. Transpl Int 2011; 24: 344.
2. Young A, Storsley L, Garg AX, et al. Health outcomes for living kidney donors with isolated medical abnormalities: a systematic review. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 1878.
3. Kokkinos C, Nanidis T, Antcliffe D, Darzi AW, Tekkis P, Papalois V,. Comparison of laparoscopic versus hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2007; 83: 41.
4. Greco F, Hoda MR, Alcaraz A, Bachmann A, Hakenberg OW, Fornara P,. Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: analysis of the existing literature. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 498.
5. Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 58.
6. Brook NR, Gibbons N, Nicol DL, McDonald SP,. Open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: activity and outcomes from all Australasian transplant centers. Transplantation 2010; 89: 1482.
7. Hadjianastassiou VG, Johnson RJ, Rudge CJ, Mamode N,. 2509 living donor nephrectomies, morbidity and mortality, including the UK introduction of laparoscopic donor surgery. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 2532.
8. Wright AD, Will TA, Holt DR, Turk TM, Perry KT,. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a look at current trends and practice patterns at major transplant centers across the United States. J Urol 2008; 179: 1488.
9. Mjen G, yen O, Holdaas H, Midtvedt K, Line P,. Morbidity and mortality in 1022 consecutive living donor nephrectomies: benefits of a living donor registry. Transplantation 2009; 88: 1273.
10. Chin EH, Hazzan D, Edye M, et al. The first decade of a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program: effect of surgeon and institution experience with 512 cases from 1996 to 2006. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209: 106.
11. Harper JD, Breda A, Leppert JT, Veale JL, Gritsch HA, Schulam PG,. Experience with 750 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies - is it time to use a standardized classification of complications? J Urol 2010; 183: 1941.
12. Leventhal JR, Paunescu S, Baker TB, et al. A decade of minimally invasive donation: experience with more than 1200 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies at a single institution. Clin transplant 2010; 24: 169.
13. Neipp M, Jackobs S, Becker T, et al. Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision. Transplantation 2004; 78: 1356.
14. Schnitzbauer AA, Loss M, Hornung M, et al. Mini-incision for strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy in living kidney donation vs flank incision. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 2948.
15. Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W, Ijzermans JN,. Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 2006; 81: 881.
16. Yang SC, Lee DH, Rha KH, Park K,. Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: two cases. Transplant Proc 1994; 26: 2409. (Pubitemid 24260976)
17. Kim SI, Rha KH, Lee JH, et al. Favorable outcomes among recipients of living-donor nephrectomy using video-assisted minilaparotomy. Transplantation 2004; 77: 1725.
18. Kocak B, Koffron AJ, Baker TB, et al. Proposed classification of complications after live donor nephrectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 927.
19. Rha KH, Kim YS, Kim SI, et al. Video assisted minilaparotomy surgery (VAMS)-live donor nephrectomy: 239 cases. Yonsei Med J 2004; 45: 1149.
20. Han WK, Lee HY, Jeon HG, Joo DJ, Rha KH, Yang SC,. Quality of Life Comparison Between Open and Retroperitoneal Video-Assisted Minilaparotomy Surgery for Kidney Donors. Transplant Proc 2010; 42: 1479.
21. Lee YS, Jeon HG, Lee SR, Jeong WJ, Yang SC, Han WK,. The feasibility of solo-surgeon living donor nephrectomy: initial experience using video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2755.
22. Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ 2006; 333: 221.
23. Oyen O, Andersen M, Mathisen L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 2005; 79: 1236.
24. El-Agroudy AE, Sabry AA, Wafa EW, et al. Long-term follow-up of living kidney donors: a longitudinal study. BJU Int 2007; 100: 1351.
25. Mjoen G, Midtvedt K, Holme I, et al. One- and five-year follow-ups on blood pressure and renal function in kidney donors. Transpl Int 2011; 24: 73.
26. Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, et al. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 459.
27. Jeon HG, Lee SR, Joo DJ, et al. Predictors of kidney volume change and delayed kidney function recovery after donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2010; 184: 1057.
28. Kido R, Shibagaki Y, Iwadoh K, et al. Very low but stable glomerular filtration rate after living kidney donation: is the concept of "chronic kidney disease" applicable to kidney donors? Clin Exp Nephrol 2010; 14: 356.
29. Delmonico F,. A report of the Amsterdam forum on the care of the live kidney donor: data and medical guidelines. Transplantation 2005; 79: S53.
30. Bachmann A, Wolff T, Ruszat R, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective, non-randomized comparison of early complications, donor and recipient outcome with the standard open approach. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 90.
31. Matas AJ, Bartlett ST, Leichtman AB, Delmonico FL,. Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: survey of United States transplant centers. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 830.
32. Tan HP, Shapiro R, Montgomery RA, Ratner LE,. Proposed live donor nephrectomy complication classification scheme. Transplantation 2006; 81: 1221.
33. Troppmann C, Perez RV, McBride M,. Similar long-term outcomes for laparoscopic versus open live-donor nephrectomy kidney grafts: an OPTN database analysis of 5532 adult recipients. Transplantation 2008; 85: 916.
34. Dols LF, Kok NF, Ijzermans JN,. Live donor nephrectomy: a review of evidence for surgical techniques. Transpl Int 2010; 23: 121.
35. Greco F, Hoda MR, Fornara P,. Reply from authors re: Eric Lechevallier. laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: is it really better? Eur Urol 2010; 58: 512.
36. Yang SC, Han WK, Rha KH, Lee SY, Jeon HG,. Video-Assisted Minilaparotomy Surgery. Seoul: Yonsei University Press, 2009, pp. 7-105.
37. Kok NF, Dols LF, Hunink MG, et al. Complex vascular anatomy in live kidney donation: imaging and consequences for clinical outcome. Transplantation 2008; 85: 1760.