Open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Activity and outcomes from all australasian transplant centers

Transplantation

Volumn 89, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1482-1488

  Brook, Nicholas R ^a   Gibbons, Norma ^b   Nicol, David L ^b   McDonald, Stephen P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c ANZDATA Registry   (Australia)

Author keywords

Kidney transplantation; Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; Live donation; Open donor nephrectomy

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; NEW ZEALAND; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMANS; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; NEW ZEALAND; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77954085941     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181dd35a0     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The four year Johns Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 2090.
2. Shaffer D, Sahyoun AI, Madras PN, et al. Two hundred one consecutive living-donor nephrectomies. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 426.
3. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic live donor ne-phrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 60: 1047.
4. Hensman C, Lionel G, Hewett P, et al. Laparoscopic live donor ne-phrectomy: The preliminary experience. Aust N Z J Surg 1999; 69: 365.
5. Wright AD, Will TA, Holt DR, et al. Laparoscopic living donor ne-phrectomy: A look at current trends and practice patterns at major transplant centers across the United States. J Urol 2008; 179: 1488.
6. Shafizadeh S, McEvoy JR, Murray C, et al. Laparoscopic donor ne-phrectomy: Impact on an established renal transplant program. Am Surg 2000; 66: 1132.
7. Brown SL, Biehl TR, Rawlins MC, et al. Laparoscopic live donor ne-phrectomy:Acomparison with the conventional open approach.J Urol 2001; 165: 766.
8. Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J,Jacobs S, et al. Increased ratesof donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 392.
9. Kuo PC, Johnson LB. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy increases the supply of living donor kidneys: A center-specific microeconomic analysis. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2211.
10. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Maley WR, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The recipient. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2319.
11. Ratner LE, Hiller J, Sroka M, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy removes disincentives to live donation. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 3402.
12. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Chavin KD, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Technical considerations and allograft vascular length. Transplantation 1998; 65: 1657.
13. Philosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: Comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 1999; 68: 497.
14. Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrec-tomy. Transplantation 1999; 67: 722.
15. Troppmann C, Ormond DB, Perez RV. Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: A UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 1295.
16. Ratner LE, Buell JF, Kuo PC. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Pro. Transplantation 2000; 70: 1544.
17. Sasaki T, Finelli F, Barhyte D, et al. Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy here to stay? Am J Surg 1999; 177: 368.
18. Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Potter SR, et al. Surgical techniques in right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195: 131.
19. Brook NR, Harper SJ, Bagul A, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy yields kidneys with structure and function equivalentto those retrieved by open surgery. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 625.
20. McDonald SP, Russ GR, Kerr PG, et al. ESRD in Australia and New Zealand at the end of the millennium: A report from the ANZDATA registry. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 1122.
21. Chung E, Grant AB, Hibberd AD, et al. Why potential live renal donors prefer laparoscopic nephrectomy: A survey of live donor attitudes. BJU Int 2007; 100: 1344.
22. Mange KC, Joffe MM, Feldman HI. Effect of the use or nonuse of long-term dialysis on the subsequent survival of renal transplants from living donors. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 726.
23. Kasiske BL, Snyder JJ, Matas AJ, et al. Preemptive kidney transplantation: The advantage and the advantaged. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1358.
24. Innocenti GR, Wadei HM, Prieto M, et al. Preemptive living donor kidney transplantation: Do the benefits extend to all recipients? Transplantation 2007; 83: 144.
25. Richstone L, Seideman C, Baldinger L, et al. Conversion during laparoscopic surgery: Frequency, indications and risk factors. J Urol 2008; 180: 855.
26. Melcher ML, Carter JT, Posselt A, et al. More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 835; discussion 9.
27. Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 2175.
28. Tooher RL, Rao MM, Scott DF, et al. A systematic review of laparo-scopic live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2004; 78: 404.
29. Simon SD, Castle EP, Ferrigni RG, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: The Mayo clinic experience. J Urol 2004; 171: 1447.
30. Shokeir AA. Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry. J Urol 2007; 178: 1860.
31. Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 58.
32. Rosin D, Brasesco O, Varela J, et al. Low-pressure laparoscopy may ameliorate intracranial hypertension and renal hypoperfusion. J Lapa-roendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002; 12: 15.
33. Dunn MD, McDougall EM. Renal physiology: Laparoscopic considerations. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 609.
34. Troppmann C, McBride MA, Baker TJ, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A risk factor for delayed function and rejection in pediatric kidney recipients? A UNOS analysis. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 175.
35. Shoskes DA, Parfrey NA, Halloran PF. Increased major histocompati-bility complex antigen expression in unilateral ischemic acute tubular necrosis in the mouse. Transplantation 1990; 49: 201.
36. Ibrahim S, Jacobs F, Zukin Y, et al. Immunohistochemical manifestations of unilateral kidney ischemia. Clin Transplant 1996; 10: 646.
37. Stifelman MD, Hull D, Sosa RE, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the open approach. J Urol 2001; 166: 444.
38. Kim FJ, Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR. Renal transplantation: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 777.
39. Wolf JS Jr, Merion RM, Leichtman AB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor ne-phrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 72: 284.
40. Singer JS, Ettenger RB, Gore JL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open renal procurement for pediatric recipients of living donor renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2514.
41. Berends FJ, den Hoed PT, Bonjer HJ, et al. Technical considerations and pitfalls in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 893.
42. Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR, Su L, et al. Improved recipient results after 5 years of performing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 1108.
43. Waller JR, Hiley AL, Mullin EJ, et al. Living kidney donation: A comparison of laparoscopic and conventional open operations. Postgrad Med J 2002; 78: 153.
44. Hazebroek EJ, de Bruin RW, Bouvy ND, et al. Long-term impact of pneumoperitoneum used for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on renal function and histomorphology in donor and recipient rats. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 351.
45. Derweesh IH, Goldfarb DA, Abreu SC, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology 2005; 65: 862.
46. Troppmann C, Perez RV, McBride M. Similar long-term outcomes for laparoscopic versus open live-donor nephrectomy kidney grafts: An OPTN database analysisof5532 adult recipients.Transplantation2008; 85: 916.
47. Nogueira JM, Jacobs SC, Haririan A, et al. A single center comparison of long-term outcomes of renal allografts procured laparoscopically versus historic controls procured by the open approach. Transpl Int 2008; 21: 908.