Mini-incision for strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy in living kidney donation vs flank incision

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 2948-2952

  Schnitzbauer, Andreas A ^a,b   Loss, M ^a   Hornung, M ^a   Glockzin, G ^a   Mantouvalou, L ^a   Kruger B ^a   Kramer B K ^a   Schlitt, H J ^a   Obed, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Donor nephrectomy; Mini incision; Retroperitoneal

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CREATININE; DICLOFENAC; DIPYRONE; ENOXAPARIN; MORPHINE; OPIATE DERIVATIVE; PIRITRAMIDE; TRAMADOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DIGESTIVE FUNCTION; DRUG DOSE REGIMEN; ENTERIC FEEDING; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; ORGAN PRESERVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE THROMBOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPERITONEUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; CREATINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEPHRECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 33749648124     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfl158     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Deutsche Stiftung für Organspende 2004. Organspende und Transplantation 2004. DSO 2004, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
2. Jakobsen A. Living renal transplantation - the Oslo experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997; 12: 1825-1827
3. Giessing M, Deger S, Ebeling V, Roigas J, Turk I, Loening SA. Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results. Urologe A 2003; 42: 218-224
4. UNOS. 1996 Annual report of the US scientific registry of transplant recipients and the organ procurement and transplantation network; Transplant Data: 1988-1995. UNOS 1996; Richmond, VA.
5. Yang SL, Harkaway R, Badosa F, Ginsberg P, Greenstein MA. Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy: Improvement in patient outcome. Urology 2002; 59: 673-677
6. Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS, Nicholson ML. A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 2004; 17: 589-595
7. Neipp M, Jackobs S, Becker T et al. Living donor nephrectomy: Flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision. Transplantation 2004; 78: 1356-1361
8. Waller JR, Hiley AL, Mullin EJ, Veitch PS, Nicholson ML. Living kidney donation: A comparison of laparoscopic and conventional open operations. Postgrad Med J 2002; 78: 153-157
9. Oyen O, Andersen M, Mathisen L et al. Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: Experiences from a prospective, randomized, singel-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 2005; 79: 1236-1240
10. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The four year Johns Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 2090-2093
11. Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open livedonor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1999; 67: 722-728
12. Lennerling A, Blohme I, Ostraat O, Lonroth H, Olausson M, Nyberg G. Laparoscopic or open surgery for living donor nephrectomy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16: 383-386