Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: Single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial

British Medical Journal

Volumn 333, Issue 7561, 2006, Pages 221-224

  Kok, Niels F M ^a   Lind, May Y ^a   Hansson, Birgitta M E ^b   Pilzecker, Desiree ^b   Mertens Zur Borg, Ingrid R A M ^a   Knipscheer, Ben C ^b   Hazebroek, Eric J ^a   Dooper, Ine M ^b   Weimar, Willem ^a   Hop, Wim C J ^a   Adang, Eddy M M ^b   Van Der Wilt, Gert Jan ^b   Bonjer, Hendrik J ^a   Van Der Vliet, Jordanus A ^b   Ijzermans, Jan N M ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MORPHINE;

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEATH; DONOR; FATIGUE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIA; LAPAROSCOPY; NEPHRECTOMY; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHORT FORM 36; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ADULT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONOR; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUALITY OF LIFE;

ADULT; AGED; FATIGUE; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 33747163956     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38886.618947.7C     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ingelfinger JR. Risks and benefits to the living donor. N Engl J Med 2005;353:447-9.
2. Srivastava A, Tripathi DM, Zaman W, Kumar A. Subcostal versus transcostal mini donor nephrectomy: is rib resection responsible for pain related donor morbidity. J Urol 2003;170:738-40.
3. Yang SL, Harkaway R, Badosa F, Ginsberg P, Greenstein MA. Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy: improvement in patient outcome. Urology 2002;59:673-7.
4. Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W, Ijzermans JN. Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 2006;81:881-7.
5. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Duijvendijk P, Gouma DJ. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1800-7.
6. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey. Manual and interpretation guide: Boston, MA: Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 1993.
7. Smets EM, Garssen B, Cull A, de Haes JC. Application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 1990;73:241-5.
8. Wolf JS Jr, Merion RM, Leichtman AB, Campbell DA Jr, Magee JC, Punch JD, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001;72:284-90.
9. Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Shakhssalim N, Hosseini Moghaddam SM. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Urolog Int 2005;95:851-5.
10. Oyen O, Andersen M, Mathisen L, Kvarstein G, Edwin B, Line PD, et al. Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 2005;79:1236-40.
11. Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS, Nicholson ML. A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 2004;17:589-95.
12. Berends FJ, den Hoed PT, Bonjer HJ, Kazemier G, van Riemsdijk I, Weimar W, et al. Technical considerations and pitfalls in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16:893-8.
13. Lind MY, Liem YS, Bemelman WA, Dooper PM, Hop WC, Weimar W, et al. Live donor nephrectomy and return to work: does the operative technique matter? Surg Endosc 2003;17:591-5.
14. Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, Phelan MW, Kristo B, Gritsch AH, et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2003;169:2018-21.
15. Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, Dake NA, Cavanaugh TM, Hanaway MJ, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant 2005;19:102-9.
16. Wadstrom J. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: experience from the first 75 consecutive cases. Transplantation 2005;80:1060-6.