메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 78, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1356-1361

Living donor nephrectomy: Flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision

Author keywords

Kidney; Living donation; Minimal invasive; Nephrectomy; Outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH;

EID: 8644228465     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000140975.96729.A7     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (45)

References (25)
  • 2
    • 0032833483 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: Comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique
    • Philosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 1999; 68: 497.
    • (1999) Transplantation , vol.68 , pp. 497
    • Philosophe, B.1    Kuo, P.C.2    Schweitzer, E.J.3
  • 3
    • 0037183174 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted approaches to live-donor nephrectomy
    • Velidedeoglu E, Williams N, Brayman KL, et al. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted approaches to live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2002; 74: 169.
    • (2002) Transplantation , vol.74 , pp. 169
    • Velidedeoglu, E.1    Williams, N.2    Brayman, K.L.3
  • 4
    • 0037268690 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy
    • Pace KT, Dyer SJ, Phan V, et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 134.
    • (2003) Surg Endosc , vol.17 , pp. 134
    • Pace, K.T.1    Dyer, S.J.2    Phan, V.3
  • 5
    • 0032913098 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Anterior-retroperitoneal living donor nephrectomy: Technique and outcomes
    • Jones KW, Peters TG, Walker GW. Anterior-retroperitoneal living donor nephrectomy: technique and outcomes. Am Surg 1999; 65: 197.
    • (1999) Am Surg , vol.65 , pp. 197
    • Jones, K.W.1    Peters, T.G.2    Walker, G.W.3
  • 6
    • 0033757856 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An anterior extraperitoneal incision for donor nephrectomy that spares the rectus abdominis muscle and anterior abdominal wall nerves
    • Redman JF. An anterior extraperitoneal incision for donor nephrectomy that spares the rectus abdominis muscle and anterior abdominal wall nerves. J Urol 2000; 164: 1898.
    • (2000) J Urol , vol.164 , pp. 1898
    • Redman, J.F.1
  • 7
    • 0036242893 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy: Improvement in patient outcome
    • Yang SL, Harkaway R, Badosa F, et al. Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy: improvement in patient outcome. Urology 2002; 59: 673.
    • (2002) Urology , vol.59 , pp. 673
    • Yang, S.L.1    Harkaway, R.2    Badosa, F.3
  • 8
    • 0037612203 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy
    • Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2003; 169: 2018.
    • (2003) J Urol , vol.169 , pp. 2018
    • Perry, K.T.1    Freedland, S.J.2    Hu, J.C.3
  • 9
    • 0344035473 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mini incision live donor nephrectomy: An optimal approach for the developing countries
    • Kumar A, Tripathi DM, Srivastava A. Mini incision live donor nephrectomy: an optimal approach for the developing countries. Clin Transplant 2003; 17: 498.
    • (2003) Clin Transplant , vol.17 , pp. 498
    • Kumar, A.1    Tripathi, D.M.2    Srivastava, A.3
  • 10
    • 0346401581 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: Outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns
    • Kercher KW, Heniford BT, Matthews BD, et al. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1889.
    • (2003) Surg Endosc , vol.17 , pp. 1889
    • Kercher, K.W.1    Heniford, B.T.2    Matthews, B.D.3
  • 11
    • 0037382114 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Live donor nephrectomy and return to work: Does the operative technique matter?
    • Lind MY, Liem YS, Bemelman WA, et al. Live donor nephrectomy and return to work: does the operative technique matter? Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 591.
    • (2003) Surg Endosc , vol.17 , pp. 591
    • Lind, M.Y.1    Liem, Y.S.2    Bemelman, W.A.3
  • 12
    • 0141454887 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy compared to the hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    • Greenstein MA, Harkaway R, Badosa F, et al. Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy compared to the hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. World J Urol 2003; 20: 356.
    • (2003) World J Urol , vol.20 , pp. 356
    • Greenstein, M.A.1    Harkaway, R.2    Badosa, F.3
  • 13
    • 0006543061 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a European transplant centre
    • Ostraat O, Lonnroth H, Olausson M, et al. Experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a European transplant centre. Transpl Int 2000; 13(Suppl 1): S253.
    • (2000) Transpl Int , vol.13 , Issue.SUPPL. 1
    • Ostraat, O.1    Lonnroth, H.2    Olausson, M.3
  • 14
    • 0035196513 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic liver donor nephrectomy. Personal experiences and review of the literature
    • Rassweiler JJ, Wiesel M, Carl S, et al. Laparoscopic liver donor nephrectomy. Personal experiences and review of the literature. Urologe A 2001; 40: 485.
    • (2001) Urologe A , vol.40 , pp. 485
    • Rassweiler, J.J.1    Wiesel, M.2    Carl, S.3
  • 15
    • 0043244890 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results
    • Giessing M, Deger S, Ebeling V, et al. Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results. Urologe A 2003; 42: 218.
    • (2003) Urologe A , vol.42 , pp. 218
    • Giessing, M.1    Deger, S.2    Ebeling, V.3
  • 16
    • 1642281958 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    • Maartense S, Idu M, Bemelman FJ, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 344.
    • (2004) Br J Surg , vol.91 , pp. 344
    • Maartense, S.1    Idu, M.2    Bemelman, F.J.3
  • 17
    • 0043123386 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recipient outcome following living donor kidney transplantation using kidneys procured laparoscopically
    • Reddy KS, Mastrangelo M, T DJ, et al. Recipient outcome following living donor kidney transplantation using kidneys procured laparoscopically. Clin Transplant 2003; 17(Suppl 9): 44.
    • (2003) Clin Transplant , vol.17 , Issue.SUPPL. 9 , pp. 44
    • Reddy, K.S.1    Mastrangelo, M.2
  • 18
    • 0346218185 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 6-year experience
    • Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 2004; 171: 47.
    • (2004) J Urol , vol.171 , pp. 47
    • Jacobs, S.C.1    Cho, E.2    Foster, C.3
  • 19
    • 0034722638 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Con
    • Barry JM. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: con. Transplantation 2000; 70: 1546.
    • (2000) Transplantation , vol.70 , pp. 1546
    • Barry, J.M.1
  • 20
    • 0342803825 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Complications of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The first 175 cases
    • Chan DY, Fabrizio MD, Ratner LE, et al. Complications of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the first 175 cases. Transplant Proc 2000; 32: 778.
    • (2000) Transplant Proc , vol.32 , pp. 778
    • Chan, D.Y.1    Fabrizio, M.D.2    Ratner, L.E.3
  • 21
    • 0036783946 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: The Indianapolis experience
    • Siqueira TM, Jr., Kuo RL, Gardner TA, et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol 2002; 168: 1361.
    • (2002) J Urol , vol.168 , pp. 1361
    • Siqueira Jr., T.M.1    Kuo, R.L.2    Gardner, T.A.3
  • 22
    • 0037268014 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    • Regan JP, Cho ES, Flowers JL. Small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 108.
    • (2003) Surg Endosc , vol.17 , pp. 108
    • Regan, J.P.1    Cho, E.S.2    Flowers, J.L.3
  • 23
    • 1642401350 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: The Mayo clinic experience
    • Simon SD, Castle EP, Ferrigni RG, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo clinic experience. J Urol 2004; 171: 1447.
    • (2004) J Urol , vol.171 , pp. 1447
    • Simon, S.D.1    Castle, E.P.2    Ferrigni, R.G.3
  • 24
    • 0141669245 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: A UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival
    • Troppmann C, Ormond DB, Perez RV. Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: a UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 1295.
    • (2003) Am J Transplant , vol.3 , pp. 1295
    • Troppmann, C.1    Ormond, D.B.2    Perez, R.V.3
  • 25
    • 0033558996 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy
    • Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1999; 67: 722.
    • (1999) Transplantation , vol.67 , pp. 722
    • Nogueira, J.M.1    Cangro, C.B.2    Fink, J.C.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.