Similar long-term outcomes for laparoscopic versus open live-donor nephrectomy kidney grafts: An OPTN database analysis of 5532 adult recipients

Transplantation

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 916-919

  Troppmann, Christoph ^a   Perez, Richard V ^a   McBride, Maureen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARING   (United States)

Author keywords

Kidney graft survival; Kidney recipient outcome; Kidney transplantation; Laparoscopic nephrectomy; Live kidney donor; Surgical technique

Indexed keywords

ACUTE GRAFT REJECTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC GRAFT REJECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 41149134502     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318166ad77     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 60: 1047.
2. Troppmann C, Ormond DB, Perez RV. Laparoscopic (vs. open) live donor nephrectomy: A UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 1295.
3. Troppmann C, McBride MA, Baker TJ, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A risk factor for delayed function and rejection in pediatric kidney recipients? A UNOS analysis.AmJ Transplant 2005; 5: 175.
4. Ratner LE, Hiller J, Sroka M, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy removes disincentives to live donation. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 3402.
5. Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1999; 67: 722.
6. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Maley WR, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2319.
7. Troppmann C, Pierce JL, Wiesmann KM, et al. Early and late recipient graft function and donor outcome after laparoscopic vs open adult live donor nephrectomy for pediatric renal transplantation. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 908.
8. Lind MY, Mertens zur Borg I, Hazebroek EJ, et al. The effect of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy on the long-term renal function in donor and recipient:Aretrospective study. Transplantation 2005; 80: 700.
9. McDougall EM, Monk TG, Wolf JS Jr. The effect of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on renal function in an animal model. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 182: 317.
10. Chiu AW, Chang LS, Birkett DH, et al. The impact of pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, and gasless laparoscopy on the systemic and renal hemodynamics. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181: 397.
11. Humar A, Ramcharan T, Kandaswamy R, et al. Risk factors for slow graft function after kidney transplants: A multivariate analysis. Clin Transplant 2002; 16: 425.
12. Troppmann C, Gillingham KJ, Benedetti E, et al. Delayed graft function, acute rejection, and outcome after cadaver renal transplantation. Transplantation 1995; 59: 962.
13. Kurian SM, Flechner SM, Kaouk J, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy gene expression profiling reveals upregulation of stress and ischemia associated genes compared to control kidneys. Transplantation 2005; 80: 1067.
14. 2 pneumoperitoneum. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 195.