Biomarker Evaluation Does Not Confirm Efficacy of Computer-tailored Nutrition Education

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 323-330

  Kroeze, Willemieke ^a   Dagnelie, Pieter C ^b   Heymans, Martijn W ^a   Oenema, Anke ^c   Brug, Johannes ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biological markers; Information science; Lipoproteins; Nutrition education

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN; TRIACYLGLYCEROL;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TEACHING;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LIPOPROTEINS, HDL; LIPOPROTEINS, LDL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; NUTRITIONAL SCIENCES; TRIGLYCERIDES;

EID: 80052520710     PISSN: 14994046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Brug J., Oenema A., Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr 2003, 77(4 suppl):1028S-1034S.
2. Kroeze W., Werkman A., Brug J. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med 2006, 31:205-223.
3. Neuhouser M.L., Patterson R.E., King I.B., Horner N.K., Lampe J.W. Selected nutritional biomarkers predict diet quality. Public Health Nutr 2003, 6:703-709.
4. Bingham S.A. Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology. Public Health Nutr 2002, 5:821-827.
5. Willett W., Lenart E. Food frequency methods. Nutritional Epidemiology 1998, 74-94. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. W. Willett (Ed.).
6. Brug J., Wammes B. The planned promotion of healthy eating to improve population health. Understanding Consumers of Food Products 2006, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, United Kingdom. L. Frewer, H. van Trijp (Eds.).
7. van 't Veer P., Kardinaal A.F., Bausch-Goldbohm R.A., Kok F.J. Biomarkers for validation. Eur J Clin Nutr 1993, 47(suppl 2):S58-S63.
8. Rock C.L. Nutrition in the prevention of disease: current issues and concepts. Am J Prev Med 2000, 18:351-353.
9. Weber P. Role of biomarkers in nutritional science and industry-a comment. Br J Nutr 2001, 86(suppl 1):S93-95.
10. Vanhees L., Lefevre J., Philippaerts R., et al. How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness?. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005, 12:102-114.
11. Mensink R.P., Katan M.B. Effects of dietary fatty acids on serum lipids and proteins. A meta-analysis of 27 trials. Arterioscler Thromb 1992, 12:911-919.
12. Mensink R.P., Zock P.L., Kester A.D.M., Katan M.B. Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: a meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2003, 77:1146-1155.
13. Lopez A.D., Mathers C.D., Ezzati M., Jamison D.T., Murray C.J. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2006, 367:1747-1757.
14. Wild S.H., Byrne C.D. ABC of obesity. Risk factors for diabetes and coronary heart disease. BMJ 2006, 333:1009-1011.
15. Hu F.B., Manson J.E., Willett W.C. Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr 2001, 20:5-19.
16. Hu F.B., van Dam R.M., Liu S. Diet and risk of Type II diabetes: the role of types of fat and carbohydrate. Diabetologia 2001, 44:805-817.
17. Brug J., Glanz K., Van Assema P., Kok G., Van Breukelen G.J.P. The impact of computer-tailored feedback and iterative feedback on fat, fruit, and vegetable intake. Health Educ Behav 1998, 25:517-531.
18. Kroeze W., Oenema A., Campbell M., Brug J. The efficacy of Web-based and print-delivered computer-tailored interventions to reduce fat intake: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J Nutr Educ Behav 2008, 40:226-236.
19. Weinstein N.D., Sandman P.M. The precaution adoption process model. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice 2002, 121-143. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. K. Glanz, B.K. Rimer, F.M. Lewis (Eds.).
20. Kroeze W., Oenema A., Dagnelie P.C., Brug J. Examining the minimal required elements of a computer-tailored intervention aimed at dietary fat reduction: results of a randomized controlled dismantling study. Health Educ Res 2008, 23:880-891.
21. Welcome to CCKL. CCKL Web site [in Dutch]. Accessed December 9, 2010. http://www.cckl.nl.
22. Brunner EJ, Thorogood M, Rees K, Hewitt G. Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;4:CD002128. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002128.pub2.
23. de Vries H., Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns 1999, 36:99-105.
24. Kreuter M.W., Strecher V.J., Glassman B. One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials. Ann Behav Med 1999, 21:276-283.
25. Brug J., Steenhuis I., Van Assema P., De Vries H. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med 1996, 25:236-242.
26. Oenema A., Tan F., Brug J. Short-term efficacy of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition intervention: main effects and mediators. Ann Behav Med 2005, 29:54-63.
27. Nauck M., Warnick G.R., Rifai N. Methods for measurement of LDL-cholesterol: a critical assessment of direct measurement by homogeneous assays versus calculation. Clin Chem 2002, 48:236-254.
28. Schaefer E.J. Lipoproteins, nutrition, and heart disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2002, 75:191-212.
29. Van Assema P., Brug J., Ronda G., Steenhuis I. The relative validity of a short Dutch questionnaire as a means to categorize adults and adolescents to total and saturated fat intake. J Hum Nutr Diet 2001, 14:377-390.
30. Dutch Guideline Cardiovascular Risk Management 2006 2006, Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO and Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
31. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002, 106:3143-3421. National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection EaToHBCiA.
32. Wylie-Rosett J., Swencionis C., Ginsberg M., et al. Computerized weight loss intervention optimizes staff time: the clinical and cost results of a controlled clinical trial conducted in a managed care setting. J Am Diet Assoc 2001, 101:1155-1162.
33. Verheijden M, Bakx JC, Akkermans R, et al. Web-based targeted nutrition counselling and social support for patients at increased cardiovascular risk in general practice: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:e44. Accessed December 9, 2010. http://www.jmir.org/2004/4/e44/.
34. Anderson E.S., Winett R.A., Wojcik J.R., Winett S.G., Bowden T. A computerized social cognitive intervention for nutrition behavior: direct and mediated effects on fat, fiber, fruits, and vegetables, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations among food shoppers. Ann Behav Med 2001, 23:88-100.
35. Hunter D. Biochemical indicators of dietary intake. Nutritional Epidemiology 1998, 174-235. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. W.C. Willet (Ed.).
36. Arab L. Biomarkers of fat and fatty acid intake. J Nutr 2003, 133(suppl 3):925S-932S.
37. Baylin A., Campos H. The use of fatty acid biomarkers to reflect dietary intake. Curr Opin Lipidol 2006, 17:22-27.
38. Thompson R.L., Summerbell C.D., Hooper L., et al. Relative efficacy of differential methods of dietary advice: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2003, 77(4 suppl):1052S-1057S.
39. Campbell M.K., Carbone E., Honess-Morreale L., Heisler-MacKinnon J., Demissie S., Farrell D. Randomized trial of a tailored nutrition education CD-ROM program for women receiving food assistance. J Nutr Educ Behav 2004, 36:58-66.
40. Heimendinger J., O'Neill C., Marcus A.C., et al. Multiple tailored messages are effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun 2005, 10(suppl 1):65-82.
41. Papadaki A., Scott J.A. The Mediterranean eating in Scotland experience project: evaluation of an Internet-based intervention promoting the Mediterranean diet. Br J Nutr 2005, 94:290-298.
42. Brug J., Steenhuis I., van Assema P., Glanz K., DeVries H. Computer-tailored nutrition education: differences between two interventions. Health Educ Res 1999, 14:249-256.
43. Bakel AM van, Ocké MC. How many people comply with the guidelines for a healthful diet? [In Dutch] Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid. Bilthoven: RIVM. Accessed December 22, 2010. http://www.nationaalkompas.nl/Gezondheidsdeterminanten/Leefstijl/Voeding.
44. Hollander AEM de, Hoeymans N, Melse JM, Oers JAM van, Polder JJ, eds. Public Health Forecast 2006 [In Dutch] Zorg voor gezondheid - Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning 2006. Bilthoven, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu; 2006.
45. Arab L., Akbar J. Biomarkers and the measurement of fatty acids. Public Health Nutr 2002, 5:865-871.
46. Schaefer E.J., Lamon-Fava S., Ausman L.M., et al. Individual variability in lipoprotein cholesterol response to National Cholesterol Education Program Step 2 diets. Am J Clin Nutr 1997, 65:823-830.
47. Contento I.R., Randell J.S., Basch C.E. Review and analysis of evaluation measures used in nutrition education intervention research. J Nutr Educ Behav 2002, 34:2-25.
48. Kroeze W. Insights in the Efficacy of Computer-tailored Nutrition Education [dissertation]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University Medical Center; 2008.