Examining the minimal required elements of a computer-tailored intervention aimed at dietary fat reduction: Results of a randomized controlled dismantling study

Health Education Research

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 880-891

  Kroeze, Willemieke ^a   Oenema, Anke ^a   Dagnelie, Pieter C ^b   Brug, Johannes ^a,c  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAT INTAKE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DIET, FAT-RESTRICTED; DIETARY FATS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FOOD HABITS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 52449130350     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cym075     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B. One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials. Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 276-83.
2. Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK et al. How effective is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 290-8.
3. Lancaster T, Stead L. Self-help interventions for smoking cessation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, 3(CD001118).
4. Kroeze W, Werkman AM, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med 2006; 31: 205-23.
5. Campbell MK, DeVellis BM, Strecher VJ et al. Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 783-7.
6. Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P et al. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med 1996; 25: 236-42.
7. Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM et al. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychol 1999; 18: 487-94.
8. Dijkstra A. Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation. Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 527-39.
9. Oenema A, Tan F, Brug J. Short-term efficacy of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition intervention; main effects and mediators. Ann Behav Med 2005; 29: 54-63.
10. Abrams DB, Mills S, Bulger D. Challenges and future directions for tailored communication research. Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 299-306.
11. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ. Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. Health Educ Res 1996; 11: 97-105.
12. Brinberg D, Axelson ML, Price S. Changing food knowledge, food choice, and dietary fiber consumption by using tailored messages. Appetite 2000; 35: 35-43.
13. Brug J, Steenhuis I, van Assema P et al. Computer-tailored nutrition education: differences between two interventions. Health Educ Res 1999; 14: 249-56.
14. Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol 1988; 7: 355-86.
15. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM. The precaution adoption process model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2002, 121-43.
16. Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot 1996; 11: 87-98.
17. Glanz K, Brug J, Van Assema P. Are awareness of dietary fat intake and actual fat consumption associated? - A Dutch-American Comparison. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997; 51: 542-7.
18. Lechner L, Brug J, De Vries H. Misconceptions of fruit and vegetable consumption: differences between objective and subjective estimation of intake. J Nutr Educ 1997; 29: 313-20.
19. Brug J, Van Assema P, Kok G. Misconceptie van consumptie van vet, groente en fruit. Oorzaken en implicaties voor voedingsvoorlichting. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen 1998; 76: 17-23.
20. Cox DR. Planning of Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1958.
21. Van Assema P, Brug J, Ronda G et al. The relative validity of a short Dutch questionnaire as a means to categorize adults and adolescents to total and saturated fat intake. J Hum Nutr Diet 2001; 14: 377-90.
22. Brug J, Van Assema P, Kok G et al. Self-rated dietary fat intake: association with objective assessment of fat, psychosocial factors, and intention to change. J Nutr Educ 1994; 26: 218-23.
23. Conner M, Sparks P. The theory of planned behaviour and health behaviours. In: Conner M, Norman P (eds). Predicting health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models. Buckingham: The Open University, 1996, 121-62.
24. Feunekes GIJ, Van Staveren WA, De Vries JHM et al. Relative and biomarker-based validity of a food-frequency questionnaire estimating intake of fats and cholesterol. Am J Clin Nutr 1993; 58: 489-96.
25. Voedingscentrum [Netherlands Nutrition Centre]. Zo eet Nederland - Resultaten van de Voedselconsumptiepeiling 1997-1998. Den Haag: Voedingscentrum, 1998.
26. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1977; 4: 141-85.
27. Gollwitzer PM. Goal achievement: the role of intentions. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M (eds). European Review of Social Psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1993.
28. Reiter E, Robertson RM, Osman LM. Lessons from a failure: generating tailored smoking cessation letters. Artif Intell 2003; 144: 41-58.
29. Klein WM, Weinstein ND. (eds). Social Comparison and Unrealistic Optimism about Personal Risk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
30. Fries EA, Bowen DJ, Hopp HP et al. Psychological effects of dietary fat analysis and feedback: a randomized feedback design. J Behav Med 1997; 20: 607-19.
31. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
32. Gibbons FX, Buunk BP. Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 76: 129-42.
33. Brug J, Glanz K, Van Assema P et al. The impact of computer-tailored feedback and iterative feedback on fat, fruit, and vegetable intake. Health Educ Behav 1998; 25: 517-31.
34. Heimendinger J, O'Neill C, Marcus AC et al. Multiple tailored messages are effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun 2005; 10(Suppl. 1):65-82.
35. Central Bureau voor de Statistiek [Statistics Netherlands]. In: Voorburg/Heerlen. Statline. Available at: http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/ table.asp?PA=70896ned&D1=0,5,6&D2=0&D3=0&D4=0&D5=0&D6= (l-11)-l&DM=SLNL&LA=nl&TT=2. Accessed 23 June 2006.
36. Ocké MC, Hulshof KFAM, Löwik MRH. Hoeveel mensen hebben een ongezond voedingspatroon? In: Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid. Bilthoven. Available at: http://www.rivm.nl/vtv/ object_document/o1451n19088.html. Accessed 23 June 2006.
37. Willett W, Lenart E. Food frequency methods. In: Willett W, (ed.). Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.