The determinants and performance effects of managers' performance evaluation biases

Accounting Review

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1549-1575

  Bol, Jasmijn C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Centrality bias; Leniency bias; Performance evaluation; Subjectivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052463168     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr-10099     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abernethy, M. A., J. Bouwens, and L. van Lent. 2004. Determinants of control system design in divisionalized firms. The Accounting Review 79 (3): 545-570. (Pubitemid 39051428)
2. Adams, J. S. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67: 422-436.
3. Akerlof, G. A., and J. L. Yellen. 1988. Fairness and unemployment. The American Economic Review 78 (2): 44-49.
4. Arkin, R., H. Cooper, and T. Kolditz. 1980. A statistical review of the literature concerning the self-serving attribution bias in interpersonal influence situations. Journal of Personality 48 (4): 435-448.
5. Baiman, S., and M. V. Rajan. 1995. The informational advantages of discretionary bonus schemes. The Accounting Review 70 (4): 557-579.
6. Baker, G. P., R. Gibbons, and K. J. Murphy. 1994. Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (4): 1125-1156.
7. Banks, C. G., and K. R. Murphy. 1985. Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal. Personnel Psychology 38: 335-345.
8. Barrett, R. S. 1966. Performance Rating. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates.
9. Beer, M, and G. J. Gery. 1972. Individual and organizational correlates of pay system preferences. In Managerial Motivation and Compensation, edited by H. L. Tosi. East Lansing, MI: Graduate School of Business of Michigan State University.
10. Bemardin, H. J., D. K. Cooke, and P. Villanova. 2000. Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2): 232-234.
11. Bemardin, H. J., and P. Villanova. 1986. Performance appraisal. In Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings, edited by E. A. Locke. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books D.C. Heath and Company.
12. Blanchard, G. A., C. W. Chow, and E. Noreen. 1986. Information asymmetry, incentive schemes, and information biasing: The case of hospital budgeting under rate regulation. The Accounting Review 61 (1): 1-15.
13. Blinder, A. S., and D. H. Choi. 1990. A shred of evidence on theories of wage stickiness. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105 (4): 1003-1015.
14. Bol, J. C. 2008. Subjectivity in compensation contracting. Journal of Accounting Literature 27: 1-27.
15. Bouwens, J., and L. van Lent. 2007. Assessing the performance of business unit managers. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (4): 667-697.
16. Bretz, R. D., G. T. Milkovich, and W. Read. 1992. The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management 18 (2): 321-352.
17. Bull, C. 1983. Implicit contracts in the absence of enforcement and risk aversion. The American Economic Review 73 (4): 658-671.
18. Camerer, C. F., G. Loewenstein, and M. Rabin. 2004. Advances in Behavioral Economics. New York, NY: Princeton University Press.
19. Cichello, M. S., C. E. Fee, C. J. Hadlock, and R. Sonti. 2009. Promotions, turnover, and performance evaluation: Evidence from the careers division managers. The Accounting Review 84 (4): 1119-1143.
20. Cohen-Charash, Y., and P. E. Spector. 2001. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 (2): 278-321. (Pubitemid 33132714)
21. Colquitt, J. A., D. E. Conlon, M. J. Wesson, C. O. L. H. Porter, and K. Yee Ng. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (3): 425-145.
22. Feldman, J. M. 1981. Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (2): 127-148.
23. Freeberg, N. E. 1969. Relevance of rater-ratee acquaintance in the validity and reliability of ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 53 (6): 518-524.
24. Friedrich, J. 1993. Primary error detection and minimization (PEDMIN) strategies in social cognition: A reinterpretation of confirmation bias phenomena. Psychological Review 100 (2): 298-319.
25. Garland, H. 1973. The effects of piece-rate underpayment and overpayment on job performance: A test of equity theory with a new induction procedure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 3: 325-334.
26. Gibbs, M., K. A. Merchant, W. A. Van der Stede, and M. E. Vargus. 2004. Determinants and effects of subjectivity in incentives. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 409-436. (Pubitemid 38671088)
27. Greenberg, J. 1990. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management 16 (2): 399-432.
28. Harris, M. M. 1994. Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework. Journal of Management 20 (4): 737-756.
29. Harris, M. M. and J. Schaubroeck. 1988. A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology 41 (1): 43-62.
30. Hayes, R. M., and S. Schaefer. 2000. Implicit contracts and the explanatory power of top executive compensation for future performance. RAND Journal of Economics 31 (2): 273-293.
31. Higgins, E. T., and J. A. Bargh. 1987. Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology 38: 369-425.
32. Hogarth, R. M., and M. W. Reder. 1987. Rational Choice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
33. Holmstrom, B. 1979. Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 74-91.
34. Holmstrom, B. 1981. Contractual models of the labor market. The American Economic Review 7\ (2): 308-313.
35. Holmstrom, B., and P. Milgrom. 1991. Multi-task principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7: 24-52.
36. Indjejikian, R. J. 1999. Performance evaluation and compensation research: An agency perspective. Accounting Horizons 13 (2): 147-157.
37. Indjejikian, R. J., and M. Matejka. 2006. Organizational slack in decentralized firms: The role of business unit controllers. The Accounting Review 81 (4): 849-872. (Pubitemid 44257832)
38. Jansen, P., K. A. Merchant, and W. A. Van der Stede. 2009. National differences in performance-dependent compensation practices: The differing roles of financial performance measurement in the United States and The Netherlands. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34: 58-84.
39. Jawahar, I. M., and C. R. Williams. 1997. Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology 50 (4): 905-926.
40. Kingsbury, F. A. 1922. Analyzing ratings and training raters. Journal of Personnel Research 1: 377-383.
41. Kneeland, N. 1929. That lenient tendency in rating. Personnel Journal 7: 356-366.
42. Landy, F. J., and J. L. Farr. 1980. Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin 87 (1): 72-107.
43. Latham, G. 1986. Job performance and appraisal. In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by C. Cooper, and I. Robertson. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
44. Lawler, E. E. 1990. Strategic Pay: Aligning Organizational Strategies and Pay Systems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45. Levy, P. E., and J. R. Williams. 2004. The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management 30 (6): 881-905. (Pubitemid 40030675)
46. Longenecker, C. O., H. P. Sims, and D. A. Gioia. 1987. Behind the mask: The politic of employee appraisal. The Academy of Management Executive 1 (3): 183-193.
47. MacLeod, B. W., and J. M. Malcomson. 1989. Implicit contracts, incentive compatibility, and involuntary unemployment. Econometrica 57 (2): 447-480.
48. McFarlane Shore, L., and G. C. Thornton. 1986. Effects of gender on self- and supervisory ratings.
49. Academy of Management Journal 29 (1): 115-129.
50. Mero, N. P., S. J. Motowidlo, and A. L. Anna. 2003. Effects of accountability on rating behavior and rater accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33 (12): 2493-2514. (Pubitemid 38213880)
51. Meyer, H. H. 1975. The pay-for-performance dilemma. Organizational Dynamics 3 (3): 39-50.
52. Mischel, W., E. B. Ebbesen, and A. M. Zeiss. 1976. Determinants of selective memory about the self. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 44 (1): 92-103.
53. Moers, F. 2005. Discretion and bias in performance evaluation: The impact of diversity and subjectivity. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 (1): 67-80. (Pubitemid 39305390)
54. Motowidlo, S. J., and W. C. Borman. 1977. Behaviorally anchored scales for measuring morale in military units. Journal of Applied Psychology 62 (2): 177-183. (Pubitemid 8064433)
55. Murphy, K. R., and J. Cleveland. 1991. Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
56. Napier, N. K., and G. P. Latham. 1986. Outcome expectancies of people who conduct performance appraisals. Personnel Psychology 39 (4): 827-837.
57. Pearce, J. L., and L. W. Porter. 1986. Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (2): 211-218.
58. Prendergast, C. 1999. The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature 37 (1): 7-63.
59. Rees, R. 1985. The theory of principal and agent: Part I. Bulletin of Economic Research 37 (1): 3-26.
60. Rynes, S. L., B. Gerhart, and L. Parks. 2005. Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology 56: 571-600. (Pubitemid 40300797)
61. Saal, F. E., R. G. Downey, and M. A. Lahey. 1980. Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data. Psychological Bulletin 88 (2): 413-428.
62. Saal, F. E., and F. J. Landy. 1977. The mixed standard rating scale: An evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 18: 19-35.
63. Shavell, S. 1979. Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. The Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 55-73.
64. Shore, T. H., and A. Tashchian. 2002. Accountability forces in performance appraisal: Effects of selfappraisal information, normative information, and task performance. Journal of Business and Psychology 17 (2): 261-274. (Pubitemid 37131105)
65. Smith, D. E. 1986. Training programs for performance appraisal: A review. Academy of Management Review 11 (1): 22-40.
66. Thorndike, R. L. 1949. Personnel Selection: Test and Measurement Techniques. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley.
67. Tsui, A. S., and C. A. O'Reilly. 1989. Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. The Academy of Management Journal 32 (2): 402-423.
68. Villanova, P., H. J. Bemardin, S. A. Dahmus, and R. L. Sims. 1993. Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort. Educational and Psychological Measurement 53: 789-799.
69. Weinstein, N. D. 1980. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (5): 806-820.
70. Woehr, D. J., and A. I. Huffcutt. 1994. Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 67: 189-205.