Molecular Structures and Interactions in the Yeast Kinetochore

Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

Volumn 75, Issue , 2010, Pages 395-401

  Cho, U S ^a,b   Corbett, K D ^a   Al Bassam, J ^a   Bellizzi, J J ^a,e   De Wulf, P ^c   Espelin, C W ^d,f   Miranda, J J ^a,g   Simons, K ^a,h   Wei, R R ^a,i   Sorger, P K ^a   Harrison, S C ^a,b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

^f PFIZER INC   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ GENZYME CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; FUNGAL DNA; NDC80 COMPLEX;

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DNA CROSS LINKING; DNA MODIFICATION; KLUYVEROMYCES LACTIS; MICROTUBULE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YEAST; BUDDING YEAST; COMPLEX FORMATION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN;

KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 80052398753     PISSN: 00917451     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1101/sqb.2010.75.040     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Al-Bassam J, Kim H, Brouhard GJ, van Oijen A, Harrison SC, Chang F. 2010. CLASP promotes microtubule rescue by recruiting tubulin dimers to the microtubule. Dev Cell 19: 245-258.
2. Bellizzi JJ III, Sorger PK, Harrison SC. 2007. Crystal structure of the yeast inner kinetochore subunit Cep3p. Structure 15: 1422- 1430.
3. Biggins S, Severin FF, Bhalla N, Sassoon I, Hyman AA, Murray AW. 1999. The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev 13: 532-544.
4. Brouhard GJ, Stear JH, Noetzel TL, Al-Bassam J, Kinoshita K, Harrison SC, Howard J, Hyman AA. 2008. XMAP215 is a processive microtubule polymerase. Cell 132: 79-88.
5. Camahort R, Li B, Florens L, Swanson SK, Washburn MP, Gerton JL. 2007. Scm3 is essential to recruit the histone h3 variant cse4 to centromeres and to maintain a functional kinetochore. Mol Cell 26: 853-865.
6. Cheeseman IM, Desai A. 2008. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 33-46.
7. Cheeseman IM, Chappie JS, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Desai A. 2006. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubulebinding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127: 983-997.
8. Ciferri C, Pasqualato S, Screpanti E, Varetti G, Santaguida S, Dos Reis G, Maiolica A, Polka J, De Luca JG, De Wulf P, et al. 2008. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133: 427-439.
9. Cohen RL, Espelin CW, De Wulf P, Sorger PK, Harrison SC, Simons KT. 2008. Structural and functional dissection of Mif2p, a conserved DNA-binding kinetochore protein. Mol Biol Cell 19: 4480-4491.
10. Corbett KD, Yip CK, Ee L-S, Walz T, Amon A, Harrison SC. 2010. The monopolin complex crosslinks kinetochore components to regulate chromosome-microtubule attachments. Cell 142: 556- 567.
11. DeLuca JG, Gall WE, Ciferri C, Cimini D, Musacchio A, Salmon ED. 2006. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127: 969-982.
12. De Wulf P, McAinsh AD, Sorger PK. 2003. Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. Genes Dev 17: 2902-2921.
13. Doheny KF, Sorger PK, Hyman AA, Tugendreich S, Spencer F, Hieter P. 1993. Identification of essential components of the S. cerevisiae kinetochore. Cell 73: 761-774.
14. Espelin CW, Kaplan KB, Sorger PK. 1997. Probing the architecture of a simple kinetochore using DNA-protein crosslinking. J Cell Biol 139: 1383-1396.
15. Espelin CW, Simons KT, Harrison SC, Sorger PK. 2003. Binding of the essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore protein Ndc10p to CDEII. Mol Biol Cell 14: 4557-4568.
16. Fitzgerald-Hayes M, Clarke L, Carbon J. 1982. Nucleotide sequence comparisons and functional analysis of yeast centromere DNAs. Cell 29: 235-244.
17. Fukagawa T, De Wulf P. 2009. Kinetochore composition, formation and organization. In The kinetochore: From molecular discoveries to cancer therapy (ed. P De Wulf, WC Earnshaw), pp. 133-191. Springer, New York.
18. Guimaraes GJ, Dong Y, McEwen BF, Deluca JG. 2008. Kinetochore-microtubule attachment relies on the disordered N-terminal tail domain of Hec1. Curr Biol 18: 1778-1784.
19. Joglekar AP, Bouck DC, Molk JN, Bloom KS, Salmon ED. 2006. Molecular architecture of a kinetochore-microtubule attachment site. Nat Cell Biol 8: 581-585.
20. Joglekar AP, Bouck D, Finley K, Liu X, Wan Y, Berman J, He X, Salmon ED, Bloom KS. 2008. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule attachment site is conserved between point and regional centromeres. J Cell Biol 181: 587-594.
21. Kaplan KB, Hyman AA, Sorger PK. 1997. Regulating the yeast kinetochore by ubiquitin-dependent degradation and Skp1p-mediated phosphorylation. Cell 91: 491-500.
22. Lampert F, Hornung P, Westermann S. 2010. The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J Cell Biol 189: 641-649.
23. Lechner J, Carbon J. 1991. A 240 kd multisubunit protein complex, CBF3, is a major component of the budding yeast centromere. Cell 64: 717-725.
24. McEwen BF, Dong Y. 2010. Contrasting models for kinetochore microtubule attachment in mammalian cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 2163-2172.
25. Mellor J, Rathjen J, Jiang W, Barnes CA, Dowell SJ. 1991. DNA binding of CPF1 is required for optimal centromere function but not for maintaining methionine prototrophy in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 2961-2969.
26. Meluh PB, Koshland D. 1995. Evidence that the MIF2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a centromere protein with homology to the mammalian centromere protein CENP-C. Mol Biol Cell 6: 793-807.
27. Meluh PB, Yang P, Glowczewski L, Koshland D, Smith MM. 1998. Cse4p is a component of the core centromere of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 94: 607-613.
28. Meraldi P, McAinsh AD, Rheinbay E, Sorger PK. 2006. Phylogenetic and structural analysis of centromeric DNA and kinetochore proteins. Genome Biol 7: R23. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-r23.
29. Miranda JJ, De Wulf P, Sorger PK, Harrison SC. 2005. The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12: 138-143.
30. Miranda JJ, King DS, Harrison SC. 2007. Protein arms in the kinetochore- microtubule interface of the yeast DASH complex. Mol Biol Cell 18: 2503-2510.
31. Mizuguchi G, Xiao H, Wisniewski J, Smith MM, Wu C. 2007. Nonhistone Scm3 and histones CenH3-H4 assemble the core of centromere-specific nucleosomes. Cell 129: 1153-1164.
32. Monje-Casas F, Prabhu VR, Lee BH, Boselli M, Amon A. 2007. Kinetochore orientation during meiosis is controlled by Aurora B and the monopolin complex. Cell 128: 477-490.
33. Obuse C, Iwasaki O, Kiyomitsu T, Goshima G, Toyoda Y, Yanagida M. 2004. A conserved Mis12 centromere complex is linked to heterochromatic HP1 and outer kinetochore protein Zwint-1. Nat Cell Biol 6: 1135-1141.
34. Pagliuca C, Draviam VM, Marco E, Sorger PK, De Wulf P. 2009. Roles for the conserved spc105p/kre28p complex in kinetochore- microtubule binding and the spindle assembly checkpoint. PLoS One 4: e7640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007640.
35. Pinsky BA, Kung C, Shokat KM, Biggins S. 2006. The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 8: 78-83.
36. Rabitsch KP, Petronczki M, Javerzat JP, Genier S, Chwalla B, Schleiffer A, Tanaka TU, Nasmyth K. 2003. Kinetochore recruitment of two nucleolar proteins is required for homolog segregation in meiosis I. Dev Cell 4: 535-548.
37. Russell ID, Grancell AS, Sorger PK. 1999. The unstable F-box protein p58-Ctf13 forms the structural core of the CBF3 kinetochore complex. J Cell Biol 145: 933-950.
38. Santaguida S, Musacchio A. 2009. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J 28: 2511-2531.
39. Schulman BA, Carrano AC, Jeffrey PD, Bowen Z, Kinnucan ER, Finnin MS, Elledge SJ, Harper JW, Pagano M, Pavletich NP. 2000. Insights into SCF ubiquitin ligases from the structure of the Skp1-Skp2 complex. Nature 408: 381-386.
40. Tien JF, Umbreit NT, Gestaut DR, Franck AD, Cooper J, Wordeman L, Gonen T, Asbury CL, Davis TN. 2010. Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J Cell Biol 189: 713-723.
41. Toth A, Rabitsch KP, Galova M, Schleiffer A, Buonomo SB, Nasmyth K. 2000. Functional genomics identifies monopolin: A kinetochore protein required for segregation of homologs during meiosis I. Cell 103: 1155-1168.
42. Wang HW, Ramey VH, Westermann S, Leschziner AE, Welburn JP, Nakajima Y, Drubin DG, Barnes G, Nogales E. 2007. Architecture of the Dam1 kinetochore ring complex and implications for microtubule-driven assembly and force-coupling mechanisms. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14: 721-726.
43. Wang HW, Long S, Ciferri C, Westermann S, Drubin D, Barnes G, Nogales E. 2008. Architecture and flexibility of the yeast Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J Mol Biol 383: 894-903.
44. Wei RR, Sorger PK, Harrison SC. 2005. Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 5363-5367.
45. Wei RR, Al-Bassam J, Harrison SC. 2007. The Ndc80/HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14: 54-59.
46. Westermann S, Avila-Sakar A, Wang HW, Niderstrasser H, Wong J, Drubin DG, Nogales E, Barnes G. 2005. Formation of a dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol Cell 17: 277-290.
47. Westermann S, Wang HW, Avila-Sakar A, Drubin DG, Nogales E, Barnes G. 2006. The Dam1 kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends. Nature 440: 565-569.