Using Learning Styles in Information Literacy: Critical Considerations for Librarians

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 376-385

  Sanderson, Heather ^a  

^a SAINT MARY S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052268949     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2011.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. ACRL Characteristics of Information Literacy Programs that Illustrate Best Practices: A Guideline Online. (2003). Available:, (September 30, 2010). http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/characteristics.cfm.
2. CONZUL (Council of New Zealand University Librarians), "Best Practice Characteristics for Developing Information Literacy in New Zealand Universities: A Guideline." Online. (2006). Available: (September 30, 2010); CAUL (Council of Australian University Librarians), "Best Practice Characteristics for Developing Information Literacy in Australian Universities: A Guideline." Online. (2004). Available: (October 1, 2010). http://www.caul.edu.au/content/upload/files/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyBestPractice.pdf.
3. Bodi Sonia Teaching effectiveness and bibliographic instruction: the relevance of learning styles. College and Research Libraries 1990, 51(2):113-119.
4. Rader Hannelore B. Educating students for the information age: the role of the librarian. Reference Services Review 1997, 25(2):47-52.
5. Dalrymple Connie Perceptions and practices of learning styles in library instruction. College and Research Libraries 2002, 63(3):261-273. p. 263.
6. DeVries Susann Learning styles, active learning and the one-shot information literacy class. LOEX Quarterly 2006, 32(4):2-5.
7. Mestre Lori Accommodating diverse learning styles in an online environment. Reference and User Services Quarterly 2006, 46(2):27-32.
8. Burd Barbara A., Buchanan Lori E. Teaching the teachers: teaching and learning online. Reference Services Review 2004, 32(4):404-412.
9. Costello Barbara, Lenholt Robert, Stryker Judson Using blackboard in library instruction: addressing the learning styles of generations x and y. Journal of Academic of Librarianship 2004, 30(6):452-460.
10. McLean Evadne, Dew Stephen H. Providing library instruction to distance learning students in the 21st century. Journal of Library Administration 2006, 45(3):315-337. 10.1300/J111v45n03_01.
11. Holmes Katherine E. A kaleidoscope of learning styles: instructional supports that meet the diverse needs of distant learners. Journal of Library Administration 2002, 37(3):367-378.
12. Bianco Cecile Online tutorials: tips from the literature. Library Philosophy and Practice 2005, 8:1-6.
13. Mokhtar Intan Azura, Majid Shaheen, Foo Schubert Teaching information literacy through learning styles: the application of Gardner's multiple intelligences. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 2008, 40(3):93-109. 10.1177/0961000608089345.
14. Jones Rosie, Peters Karen, Shields Emily Transform your training: practical approaches to interactive information literacy teaching. Journal of Information Literacy 2007, 1:35-42.
15. Weiler Angela Information-seeking behavior in generation y students: motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. Journal of Academic of Librarianship 2005, 31:46-53.
16. Bodi Teaching effectiveness and bibliographic instruction: the relevance of learning styles. College and Research Libraries 1990, 51(2):113-119. p. 115.
17. Webb Jo, Powis Chris Teaching Information Skills: Theory and Practice 2004, 30. Facet, London.
18. Price Linda Individual differences in learning: cognitive control, cognitive style and learning style. Educational Psychology 2004, 24(5):681-698. p. 681.
19. Frank Coffield, David Moseley, Elaine Hall, & Kathryn Ecclestone, Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review (London: Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004), (August 29, 2010). This recent review of learning styles lists 30 such pairs mentioned in the theories they examine, p. 137. The companion report by the same team is: Should We Be Using Learning Styles?: What Research has to Say to Practice (London: Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004), (August 29, 2010). http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32186.aspx.
20. Dunn Rita Capitalizing on college students' learning styles: theory, practice and research. Practical Approaches to Using Learning Styles in Higher Education 2000, Bergen and Garvey, Westport CT. R. Dunn, S. Griggs (Eds.).
21. quoted in Burd & Buchanan Teaching the teachers: teaching and learning online. Reference Services Review 2004, 32(4):404-412. p. 405.
22. Price Individual differences in learning: cognitive control, cognitive style and learning style. Educational Psychology 2004, 24(5):681-698.
23. Santo Susan A. Relationships between learning styles and online learning: myth or reality?. Performance Improvement Quarterly 2006, 19(3):73-88. p. 73.
24. Desmedt Ella, Valcke Martin Mapping the learning styles 'jungle': an overview of the literature based on citation analysis. Educational Psychology 2004, 24(4):445-464. p. 445. 10.1080/0144341042000228843.
25. Riding Richard, Cheema Indra Cognitive styles: an overview and integration. Educational Psychology 1991, 11(3/4):193-215.
26. Lynn Curry, "An Organization of Learning Styles Theory and Constructs" (paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada, April 11-15, 1983) (ERIC Document 235 185), 1983.
27. Coffield, et al. Learning Styles; Stan D. Ivie, "Learning styles: Humpty Dumpty revisited. McGill Journal of Education 2009, 44(2):177-192.
28. Sharp John G., Bowker Rob, Byrne Jenny VAK or VAK-uous? towards the trivialisation of learning and the death of scholarship. Research Papers in Education 2008, 23(3):293-314. 10.1080/02671520701755416.
29. Dembo Myron H., Howard Keith Advice about the use of learning styles: a major myth in education. Journal of College Reading and Learning 2007, 37(2):101-109.
30. Sharp, et al. VAK or VAK-uous? Towards the trivialisation of learning and the death of scholarship. Research Papers in Education 2008, 23(3):293-314. doi:10.1080/02671520701755416.
31. Coffield et al., Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review (London: Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004), (August 29, 2010) p. 2. http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx.
32. Pritchard Alan Ways of Learning: Learning Theories and Learning Styles in the Classroom 2009, See, for example, Routledge, London, NY. 2nd ed,.
33. Palloff Rena M., Pratt Keith The Virtual Student: A Profile and Guide to Working with Online Learners 2003, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
34. Ally Mohammed Foundations of educational theory for online learning. The Theory and Practice of Online Learning 2008, 15-44. Athabasca UP, Edmonton. 2nd ed. A. Terry (Ed.).
35. Coffield, et al. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre 2004, http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx (August 29, 2010) p. 125.
36. Coffield, et al. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre 2004, http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx (August 29, 2010) p. 125.
37. DeBello Thomas C. Comparison of eleven major learning styles models: variables, appropriate populations, validity of instrumentation, and the research behind them. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities 1990, 6:203-222. (September 30, 2010). http://www.ldrc.ca/projects/atutor/content/7/debello.htm.
38. Curry, "An Organization of Learning Styles Theory and Constructs" (paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada, April 11-15, 1983) (ERIC Document 235 185), 1983, pp. 7-9. Curry does not indicate why she omits the tenth instrument, Dunn and Dunn's Learning Style Inventory, from her onion model.
39. Santo Relationships between learning styles and online learning: myth or reality?. Performance Improvement Quarterly 2006, 19(3):73-88. p. 85.
40. Coffield, et al. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre 2004, http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx (August 29, 2010) p. 9.
41. Coffield, et al. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre 2004, http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx (August 29, 2010) p. 140. They identify Allinson and Hayes' Cognitive Styles Index as the strongest of the models they reviewed.
42. Desmedt, Valcke Mapping the learning styles 'jungle': an overview of the literature based on citation analysis. Educational Psychology 2004, 24(4):445-464. doi:10.1080/0144341042000228843. p. 445.
43. Cassidy Simon, et al. Learning styles: an overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology 2004, 24(4):419-444.
44. Dembo, Howard Advice about the use of learning styles: a major myth in education. Journal of College Reading and Learning 2007, 37(2):101-109. p. 104.
45. Curry Lynn A critique of the research on learning styles. Educational Leadership 1990, 48(2):50-56. p. 50.
46. Coffield, et al. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre 2004, http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx (August 29, 2010) p. 1.
47. Sharp, et al. VAK or VAK-uous? towards the trivialisation of learning and the death of scholarship. Research Papers in Education 2008, 23(3):293-314. doi:10.1080/02671520701755416 p. 300.
48. Santo Relationships between learning styles and online learning: myth or reality?. Performance Improvement Quarterly 2006, 19(3):73-88.
49. Stahl S.A. Different strokes for different folks: a critique of learning styles. American Educator 1999, 23(3):27-31. quoted in Dembo & Howard, "Major Myth," p. 103.
50. Riener Cedar, Willingham Daniel The myth of learning styles. Change 2010, 42(5):32-35.
51. Dewar Tammy, Whittington Dave Online learners and their learning strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2000, 23(4):385-403. p. 401.
52. Dembo, Howard Advice about the use of learning styles: a major myth in education. Journal of College Reading and Learning 2007, 37(2):101-109.
53. Paschler Harold, McDaniel Mark, Rohrer Doug, Bjork Robert Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2010, 9(3):105-119.
54. Willingham D.T. Do visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners need visual, auditory and kinesthetic instruction?. American Educator 2005, 29(2). under "Teachers Should Focus", (September 30, 2010). http://www.aft.org/newspubs/periodicals/ae/summer2005/willingham.cfm.
55. Riener, Willingham The myth of learning styles. Change 2010, 42(5):32-35.
56. Entwistle Noel Taking stock: an overview of key research findings. Taking Stock: Research on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 2010, 15-57. McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal and Kingston, p. 30-31. J. Christensen-Hughes, J. Mighty (Eds.).
57. Charlesworth Z.M. Learning styles across cultures: suggestions for educators. Education and Training 2008, 50(2):115-127. 10.1108/00400910810862100.
58. Cools Eva, Evans Carol, Redmond James A. Using styles for more effective learning in multicultural and e-learning environments. Multicultural Education and Technology Journal 2009, 3(1):5-16. p. 9. 10.1108/17504970910951110.
59. Kolb David A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development 1984, 30-42. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
60. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development 1984, 77-78. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
61. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development 1984, 66. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
62. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development 1984, 88. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
63. Coffield et al., Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review (London: Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004), (August 29, 2010) pp. 65-67; see also Cassidy, "Learning styles: an overview of theories, models, and measures", Educational Psychology 24 (4) (2004): 419-444 p. 431. http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx.
64. Coffield et al., Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review (London: Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004), (August 29, 2010) p. 68. http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx.
65. Coffield, et al. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre 2004, http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx (August 29, 2010) p. 70.
66. Coffield, et al. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre 2004, http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx (August 29, 2010) p. 69.
67. Jarvis Peter Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Human Learning 2006, Routledge, London.
68. Marton Ference, Säljö Roger Approaches to learning. The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education 2005, 39-58. University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment, Edinburgh, (September 30, 2010). http://www.tla.ed.ac.uk/resources/EoL.html, 3rd (Internet) edition. F. Marton, D. Hounsell, N. Entwistle (Eds.).
69. Entwistle Noel Contrasting perspectives on learning. The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education 2005, 3-22. p. 17, University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment, Edinburgh, (September 30, 2010). http://www.tla.ed.ac.uk/resources/EoL.html, 3rd (Internet) edition. F. Marton, D. Hounsell, N. Entwistle (Eds.).
70. Entwistle Contrasting Perspectives on Learning", p. 20. The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education 2005, 3-22. University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment, Edinburgh, http://www.tla.ed.ac.uk/resources/EoL.html (September 30, 2010). 3rd (Internet) edition. F. Marton, D. Hounsell, N. Entwistle (Eds.).
71. Laurillard Diana Re-thinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology 2002, 28. RoutledgeFalmer, London. 2nd ed.
72. Ramsden Paul Learning to Teach in Higher Education 2003, 62. Routledge, New York. 2nd ed.
73. Haggis Tamsin Constructing images of ourselves?: a critical investigation into 'approaches to learning' research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal 2003, 29:89-104. p. 90-91. 10.1080/0141192032000057401.
74. Coffield et al., Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review (London: Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004), (August 29, 2010) p. 99. http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx.
75. Coffield, et al. Should We Be Using Learning Styles?: What Research has to Say to Practice 2004, London: Learning and Skills Research Centre, http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32186.aspx (August 29, 2010) p. 26.
76. Haggis Constructing images of ourselves?: a critical investigation into 'approaches to learning' research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal 2003, 29:89-104. doi:10.1080/0141192032000057401 p. 92.
77. Coffield, et al. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre 2004, http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32188.aspx (August 29, 2010).
78. Haggis Constructing images of ourselves?: a critical investigation into 'approaches to learning' research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal 2003, 29:89-104. doi:10.1080/0141192032000057401 p. 93.
79. see also Graham Webb Deconstructing deep and surface: towards a critique of phenomenography. Higher Education 1997, 33:195-212. p. 206-207.
80. Haggis Constructing images of ourselves?: a critical investigation into 'approaches to learning' research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal 2003, 29:89-104. p. 90-91, doi:10.1080/0141192032000057401 p. 97.
81. Jones, et al. Transform your training: practical approaches to interactive information literacy teaching. Journal of Information Literacy 2007, 1:35-42. p. 35. They use Honey and Mumford's terminology, but for clarity here, I have substituted Kolb's near-equivalent terms.
82. Bruce Christine The Seven Faces of Information Literacy 1997, 16. Auslib, Adelaide.
83. Andretta Susie Phenomenography: a conceptual framework for information literacy education. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 2007, 59(2):152-168. p. 155. 10.1108/00012530710736663.
84. Maybee Clarence Undergraduate perceptions of information use: the basis for creating user-centered student information literacy instruction. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2006, 32:79-85.
85. MacMillan Margy Watching learning happen: results of a longitudinal study of journalism students. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2009, 35(2):132-142.