Motive-matching: Perceptions of intentionality for coerced action

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1255-1261

  Monroe, Andrew E ^a   Reeder, Glenn D ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attribution; Coercion; Intentionality; Mindreading; Motives

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051886598     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alicke M.D. Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126:556-574.
2. Aristotle Nicomachean ethics 1985, (T. Irwin, Trans.), Hackett, Indianapolis, IN.
3. Brigard F., Mandelbaum E., Ripley D. Responsibility and the brain sciences. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2009, 12:511-524.
4. Epley N., Waytz A. Mind perception. The Handbook of Social Psychology 2010, 498-541. Wiley, New York. 5th ed. S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, G. Lindsay (Eds.).
5. Guglielmo S., Malle B.F. Can unintended side effects be intentional? Solving a puzzle in people's judgments of intentionality and morality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2010, 36:1635-1647.
6. Guglielmo S., Monroe A.E., Malle B.F. At the heart of morality lies folk psychology. Inquiry 2009, 52:449-466.
7. Harvey J.H. Attribution of freedom. New directions in attribution research 1976, 73-96. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. J.H. Harvey, W.J. Ickes, R.F. Kidd (Eds.).
8. Heider F. The psychology of interpersonal relations 1958, Wiley, New York.
9. Hughes J.S., Trafimow D. Intentionality attributions about perfect and imperfect duties. Journal of Social Psychology 2010, 150:198-210.
10. Kammrath L.K., Mendoza-Denton R., Mischel W. Incorporating if...then...personality signatures in person perception: beyond the person-situation dichotomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:605-618.
11. Knobe J. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis 2003, 63:190-193.
12. Kruglanski A.W., Cohen M. Attributed freedom and personal causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973, 26:245-250.
13. Malle B.F. How people explain behavior: A new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1999, 3:23.
14. Malle B.F., Knobe J. The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1997, 33:101-121.
15. Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963, 67:371-378.
16. Milgram S. Obedience to authority: An experimental view 1974, Harper & Row, New York.
17. Miller P.H., Aloise P.A. Young children's understanding of the psychological causes of behavior: A review. Child Development 1989, 60:257-285.
18. Monroe A.E., Malle B.F. From uncaused will to conscious choice: The need to study, not speculate about people's folk concept of free will. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2010, 9.
19. Nelson-Le Gall S.A. Motive-outcome matching and outcome foreseeability: Effects on attribution of intentionality and moral judgments. Developmental Psychology 1985, 21:332-337.
20. Phillips J., Knobe J. Moral judgments and intuitions about freedom. Psychological Inquiry 2009, 20:30-36.
21. Read S.J., Miller L.C. Rapist or "regular guy": Explanatory coherence in the construction of mental models about others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1993, 19:526-541.
22. Read S.J., Miller L.C. Explanatory coherence and goal-based knowledge structures in making dispositional inferences. Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others 2005, 124-139. Guilford Publications, New York. B.F. Malle, S.D. Hodges (Eds.).
23. Reeder G.D. Mindreading: Judgments about intentionality and motives in dispositional inference. Psychological Inquiry 2009, 20:1-18.
24. Reeder G.D. Mindreading and dispositional inference: MIM revised and extended. Psychological Inquiry 2009, 20:73-83.
25. Reeder G.D., Monroe A.E., Pryor J.B. Impressions of Milgram's obedient teachers: Situational cues inform inferences about motives and traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 95:1-17.
26. Roese N.J., Morris M. Impression valence constrains social explanations: The case of discounting versus conjunction effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:437-448.
27. Rosset E. It's no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition 2008, 108:771-780.
28. Schultz T.R., Wells D. Judging the intentionality of action-outcomes. Developmental Psychology 1985, 21:83-89.
29. Steiner I.D. Perceived freedom. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1970, 5:187-248.
30. Trafimow D. Reeder's MIM as a special case of confluence theory. Psychological Inquiry 2009, 20:48-52.
31. Woolfolk R.L., Doris J.M., Darley J.M. Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition 2006, 100:283-301.