Reeder's MIM as a special case of confluence theory

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 48-52

  Trafimow, David ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649866017     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10478400902744311     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
2. Chadwick, R. A., Bromgard, G., Bromgard, I., & Trafimow, D. (2006). An index of specific behaviors in the moral domain. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 692-697.
3. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. Festinger, L., & Maccoby, N. (1964). On resistance to persuasive communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 359-366.
5. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
7. Kant, I. (1991). The metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1797).
8. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of a story model of juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189-206.
9. Petty,R. E., Cacioppo,J. T.,&Goldman,R.(1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
10. Roberts, S., & Pashler, H. (2000). How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review, 107, 358-367.
11. Trafimow, D. (2001). The effects of trait type and situation type on the generalization of trait expectancies across situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 1463-1468.
12. Trafimow, D. (2003). Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: Surprising insights from Bayes's theorem. Psychological Review, 110, 526-535.
13. Trafimow, D. (in press). The theory of reasoned action: A case study of falsification in psychology. Theory & Psychology.
14. Trafimow, D., Bromgard, I. K., Finlay, K. A., & Ketelaar, T. (2005). The role of affect in determining the attributional weight of immoral behaviors.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 935-948.
15. Trafimow, D., Reeder, G. D., & Bilsing, L. M. (2001). Everybody is doing it: The effects of base rate information on correspondent inferences from violations of perfect and imperfect duties. The Social Science Journal, 38, 421-433.
16. Trafimow, D., & Rice, S. (2008). Potential performance theory (PPT): A general theory of task performance applied to morality. Psychological Review, 115, 447-462.
17. Trafimow, D., & Rice, S. (in press-a). What if social scientists had reviewed great scientific works of the past? Perspectives on Psychological Science.
18. Trafimow, D., & Rice, S. (in press-b). The role of auxiliary assumptions in the falsification of ergonomics theories. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.
19. Trafimow, D., & Rice, S. (in press-c). Potential performance theory (PPT): Describing a methodology for analyzing task performance. Behavior Research Methods.
20. Trafimow, D., & Trafimow, S. (1999). Mapping imperfect and perfect duties on to hierarchically and partially restrictive trait dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 686-695.
21. Whewell, W. (1840). Philosophy of the inductive sciences. London: Parker.
22. Wolfson, R. (2003). Simply Einstein: Relativity demystified. New York: W.W. Norton.