Escalation of commitment in troubled IT projects: Influence of project risk factors and self-efficacy on the perception of risk and the commitment to a failing project

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 934-945

  Jani, Arpan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS   (United States)

Author keywords

Escalation of commitment; IT projects; Project risk management; Risk perception; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT; IT PROJECT; PROJECT MANAGERS; PROJECT RISK; PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK FACTORS; SELF EFFICACY; SIMULATION-BASED;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MANAGERS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

RISK PERCEPTION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 80051874798     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory 1986, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control 1997, W. H. Freeman and Company, NY.
3. Bandura A., Wood R. Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 56:805-814.
4. Barki H., Rivard S., Talbot J. Toward an assessment of software development risk. Journal of Management Information Systems 1993, 10(2):203-225.
5. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
6. Bazerman M.H., Moore D. Judgment in managerial decision making 2008, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
7. Boehm B.W. Software risk management: Principles and practices. IEEE Software 1991, 8(1):32-41.
8. Boehm B.W., Ross R. Theory-W software project management: Principles and examples. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 1989, 15(7):902-916.
9. Charette R.N. Software engineering risk analysis and management 1989, Intertext, NY.
10. Du S., Keil M., Mathiassen L., Shen Y., Tiwana A. Attention-shaping tools, expertise, and perceived control in IT project risk assessment. Decision Support Systems 2007, 43(1):269-283.
11. Dunegan K.J., Duchon D., Barton S.L. Affect, risk, and decision criticality: Replication and extension in a business setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1992, 53(3):335-351.
12. Epley N., Gilovich T. The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science 2006, 17(4):311-318.
13. Gist M.E. Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review 1987, 12(3):472-485.
14. Gist M.E., Mitchell T.R. Self-efficacy: Theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review 1992, 17(2):183-211.
15. Gist M.E., Schwoerer C., Rosen B. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989, 74(6):884-891.
16. Hall R.I. The natural logic of management policy making: its implications for the survival of an organization. Management Science 1984, 30(8):905-927.
17. Heath C., Tversky A. Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1991, 4(1):5-28.
18. Helveg-Larsen M., Shepperd J.A. Do moderators of optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2001, 5(1):74-95.
19. Jani A. An experimental investigation of factors influencing perceived control over a failing project. International Journal of Project Management 2008, 26:726-732.
20. Kadous K., Sedor L.M. The efficacy of third-party consultation in preventing managerial escalation of commitment: The role of mental representations. Contemporary Accounting Research 2004, 21(1):55-82.
21. Kappelman L.A., McKeeman R., Zhang L. Early warning signs of IT project failure: The dominant dozen. Information Systems Management 2006, 23(4):31-36.
22. Keil M. Pulling the plug: Software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly 1995, 19(4):421-447.
23. Keil M., Mann J. The nature and extent of IT project escalation: Results from a survey of IS audit and control professionals (Part 1). IS Control and Audit Journal 1997, 1:40-48.
24. Keil M., Robey D. Blowing the whistle on troubled software projects. Communications of the ACM 2001, 44(4):87-93.
25. Keil M., Cule P.E., Lytinnen K., Schmidt R.C. A framework for identifying software project risks. Communications of the ACM 1998, 41(11):76-83.
26. Keil M., Tan B.C.Y., Wei K., Saarinen T. A cross cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly 2000, 24(2):299-325.
27. Keil M., Wallace L., Turk D., Dixon-Randall G., Nulden U. An investigation of risk perception and risk propensity on the decision to continue a software development project. The Journal of Systems and Software 2000, 53(2):145-157.
28. Keil M., Rai A., Mann J., Zhang P. Why software projects escalate: The relative importance of project management and escalation constructs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2003, 50(3):251-261.
29. Keil M., Li L., Mathiassen L., Zheng G. The influence of checklists and roles on software practitioner risk perception and decision-making. Journal of Systems and Software 2008, 81(6):908-919.
30. Klein W.M., Kunda Z. Exaggerated self-assessments and the preference for controllable risks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1994, 59(3):410-427.
31. Krueger N., Dickson P.R. How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences 1994, 25(3):385-400.
32. Locke E.A., Latham G.P. A theory of goal setting and task performance 1990, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
33. March J.G., Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science 1987, 33(11):1404-1418.
34. Mellers B.A., Chang S. Representations of risk judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1994, 57(2):167-184.
35. Moon H. Looking forward and looking back: Integrating completion and sunk-cost effects within an escalation of commitment progress decision. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86(1):104-113.
36. Onifade E., Harrison P.D., Cafferty T.P. Causal attributions for poorly performing projects: Their effect on project continuation decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1997, 27(5):439-452.
37. Osborn R.N., Jackson D.H. Leaders, riverboat gamblers, or purposeful unintended consequences in the management of complex dangerous technologies. Academy of Management Journal 1988, 31(4):924-947.
38. Ropponen J., Lyytinen K. Components of Software Development Risk: How to address them? A project manager survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2000, 26(2):98-112.
39. Salter S.B., Sharp D.J. Agency effects and escalation of commitment: Do small national culture differences matter?. International Journal of Accounting 2001, 36:33-45.
40. Sengupta K., Abdel-Hamid T.K. Alternative conceptions of feedback in dynamic environments: An experimental investigation. Management Science 1993, 39(4):411-428.
41. Sengupta K., Abdel-Hamid T.K. The impact of unreliable information on the management of software projects: A dynamic decision perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1996, 26(2):177-189.
42. Sengupta K., Abdel-Hamid T.K., Van Wassenhove L.N. The experience trap. Harvard Business Review 2008, 86(2):94-101.
43. Shapira Z. Risk taking: A managerial perspective 1995, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
44. Shivpuri, S. (2002) The effect of controllability and stability on escalation of commitment. Unpublished Senior Honors Thesis. The Ohio State University.
45. Sitkin S.B., Pablo A.L. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review 1992, 17(1):9-39.
46. Sitkin S.B., Weingart L.R. Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38(6):1573-1592.
47. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236(4799):280-285.
48. Smith H.J., Keil M., Depledge G. Keeping mum as the project goes under: Towards and explanatory model. Journal of Management Information Systems 2001, 18(2):189-228.
49. Sterman J.D. Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1989, 43(3):301-335.
50. Sterman J.D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science 1989, 35(3):321-339.
51. Tan B.C.Y., Smith H.J., Keil M., Montealegre R. Reporting bad news about software projects: Impact of organizational climate and information asymmetry in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2003, 50(1):64-77.
52. Tesch D., Kloppenborg T.J., Frolick M.N. IT project risk factors: The project management professional's perspective. Journal of Computer Information Systems 2007, 47(4):61-69.
53. Thaler R.H., Johnson E.J. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science 1990, 36(6):643-660.
54. Tiwana A., Keil M. The one-minute risk assessment tool. Communications of the ACM 2004, 47(11):73-77.
55. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185:1124-1130.
56. Vlek C., Stalen P. Rational and personal aspects of risk. Acta Psychologica 1980, 45:273-300.
57. Wallace L., Keil M., Rai A. How software project risk affects project outcomes: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sciences 2004, 35(2):289-321.
58. Whyte G., Saks A.M. The effects of self-efficacy on behavior in escalation situations. Human Performance 2007, 20(1):23-42.
59. Whyte G., Saks A.M., Hook S. When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior 1997, 18(5):415-432.