An experimental investigation of factors influencing perceived control over a failing IT project

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 726-732

  Jani, Arpan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS   (United States)

Author keywords

Escalation of commitment; Project control; Project management methods and tools; Project risk management

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; PROJECT CONTROL; PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODS AND TOOLS; PROJECT MANAGERS; PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT; PROJECT RISKS; SELF-EFFICACY;

MANAGERS;

EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 53049091078     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aranda J, Easterbrook SM. Anchoring and adjustment in software estimation. Paper Presented at the European Software Engineering Conference/ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal; September 5-9; 2005.
2. Arkes H.R., and Blumer C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Dec 35 1 (1985) 124-140
3. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control (1997), W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
4. Barki H., Rivard S., and Talbot J. Toward an assessment of software development risk. J Manage Inform Syst 10 2 (1993) 203-225
5. Boehne D.M., and Paese P.W. Deciding whether to complete or terminate an unfinished project: a strong test of the project completion hypothesis. Organ Behav Hum Dec 81 2 (2000) 178-194
6. Bornstein B.H., Emler A.C., and Chapman G.B. Rationality in medical treatment decisions: is there a sunk-cost effect?. Soc Sci Med 49 (1999) 215-222
7. Brehmer B., and Dorner D. Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study. Comput Hum Behav 9 2-3 (1993) 171-184
8. Brockner J. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: toward theoretical progress. Acad Manage Rev 17 1 (1992) 39-61
9. DiFonzo N., Hantula D.A., and Bordia P. Microworlds for experimental research: having your (control and collection) cake, and realism too. Behav Res Meth Instr 30 2 (1998) 278-286
10. Drummond H. Escalation in decision-making: the tragedy of taurus (1996), Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. Ellis V. Audit says DMV ignored warning (1994), Los Angeles Times A3, A24
12. Epley N., and Gilovich T. The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychol Sci 17 4 (2006) 311-318
13. Ewusi-Mensah K., and Przasnyski Z.H. On information systems project abandonment: an exploratory study of organizational practice. MIS Quart 15 1 (1991) 67-88
14. Harrison P.D., and Harrell A. The impact of "adverse selection" on managers' project evaluation decisions. Acad Manage J 36 3 (1993) 635-643
15. Haunschild P.R., Davis-Blake A., and Fichman M. Managerial overcommitment in corporate acquisition processes. Organ Sci 5 (1994) 528-540
16. Jeffrey C. The relation of judgment, personal involvement, and experience in the audit of bank loans. The Account Rev 67 4 (1992) 802-819
17. Keil M. Pulling the plug: software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quart 19 4 (1995) 421-447
18. Keil M., Cule P.E., Lytinnen K., and Schmidt R.C. A framework for identifying software project risks. Commun ACM 41 11 (1998) 76-83
19. Keil M., and Mann J. The nature and extent of IT project escalation: results from a survey of IS audit and control professionals (Part 1). IS Audit Control J 1 (1997) 40-48
20. Keil M., Mann J., and Rai A. Why software projects escalate: an empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Quart 24 4 (2000) 631-664
21. Keil M., Tan B.C.Y., Wei K.K., Saarinen T., Tuunainen V., and Wassenaar A. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quart 24 2 (2000) 299-325
22. Keil M., Truex D.P., and Mixon R. The effects of sunk cost and project completion on information technology project escalation. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 42 4 (1995) 372-381
23. Keil M., Wallace L., Turk D., Dixon-Randall G., and Nulden U. An investigation of risk perception and risk propensity on the decision to continue a software development project. The J Syst Software 53 2 (2000) 145-157
24. Kindel S. The computer that ate the company. Financ World (1992) 96-98
25. Ropponen J., and Lyytinen K. Components of software development risk: how to address them? A project manager survey. IEEE Trans Software Eng 26 2 (2000) 98-112
26. Sabherwal R., Sein M.K., and Marakas G.M. Escalating commitment to information systems projects: findings from two simulated experiments. Inform Manage 40 8 (2003) 781-798
27. Shapira Z. Risk taking: a managerial perspective (1995), Russell Sage Foundation, New York
28. Staw B. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Acad Manage Rev 6 (1981) 40-64
29. Staw B. The escalation of commitment: an update and appraisal. In: Shapira Z. (Ed). Organizational decision making (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 191-215
30. Staw B., and Ross J. Knowing when to pull the plug. Harvard Bus Rev (1987) 68-74
31. Tiwana A., and Keil M. The one-minute risk assessment tool. Commun ACM 47 11 (2004) 73-77
32. Wallace L., and Keil M. Software project risks and their impact on outcomes. Commun ACM 47 4 (2004) 68-73
33. Wallace L., Keil M., and Rai A. How software project risk affects project outcomes: an investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sci 35 2 (2004) 289-321
34. Whyte G. Escalation of commitment to a course of action: a reinterpretation. Acad Manage Rev 11 2 (1986) 311-321
35. Whyte G., Saks A.M., and Hook S. When success breeds failure: the role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. J Organ Behav 18 5 (1997) 415-432
36. Whyte G., and Saks A.M. The effects of self-efficacy on behavior in escalation situations. Hum Perform 20 1 (2007) 23-42