Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: A micro-CT and histologic analysis

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 980-986

  Teymouri, Jessica ^a   Hullar, Timothy E ^a   Holden, Timothy A ^a   Chole, Richard A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Array position; Cochlear implant; Computed tomographic scan; Histology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TEMPORAL BONE;

COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HUMANS; TEMPORAL BONE;

EID: 80051761865     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182255915     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, et al. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27:1083-8. (Pubitemid 44863730)
2. Fraysse B, Macias AR, Sterkers O, et al. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:624-33. (Pubitemid 44180473)
3. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, et al. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;115:796-802. (Pubitemid 40604682)
4. James CJ, Fraysse B, Deguine O, et al. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11:57-62. (Pubitemid 44629844)
5. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Etlert CP, et al. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential. J Am Acad Audiol 2010;21:5-15.
6. Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Shallop JK, et al. Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear Hear 2010;31: 186-94.
7. Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, et al. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:920-8.
8. Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, et al. CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002;3:332-50. (Pubitemid 35204666)
9. van Wermeskerken GK, van Olphen AF, Graamans K. Imaging of electrode position in relation to electrode functioning after cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:1527-31.
10. Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, et al. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children. Laryngoscope 2004;114:71-6. (Pubitemid 38141070)
11. Whiting BR, Holden TA, Brunsden BS, et al. Use of computed tomography scans for cochlear implants. J Digit Imaging 2008;21: 323-8.
12. Verbist BM, Joemai RM, Briaire JJ, et al. Cochlear coordinates in regard to cochlear implantation: A clinically individually applicable 3 dimensional CT-based method. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:738-44.
13. Verbist BM, Skinner MW, Cohen LT, et al. Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31:722-30.
14. Ketten DR, Skinner MW, Wang G, et al. In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1998;175:1-16. (Pubitemid 28523222)
15. Whiting BR, Bae KT, Skinner MW. Cochlear implants: Threedimensional localization by means of coregistration of CT and conventional radiographs. Radiology 2001;221:543-9. (Pubitemid 33043443)
16. Xu J, Xu SA, Cohen LT, et al. Cochlear view: Postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 2000;21:49-56. (Pubitemid 30036497)
17. Skinner MW, Holden TA, Whiting BR, et al. In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2007;197:2-24.
18. Voie AH. Imaging the intact guinea pig tympanic bulla by orthogonalplane fluorescence optical sectioning microscopy. Hear Res 2002; 171:119-28. (Pubitemid 36158690)
19. Lane JI, Driscoll CL, Witte RJ, et al. Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: A cadaveric validation study comparing 64-slice multidetector computed tomography with microcomputed tomography. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:191-4. (Pubitemid 46175119)
20. Lee J, Nadol JB Jr., Eddington DK. Factors associated with incomplete insertion of electrodes in cochlear implant surgery: A histopathologic study. Audiol Neurootol 2011;16:69-81.
21. Lee J, Nadol JB Jr., Eddington DK. Depth of electrode insertion and postoperative performance in humans with cochlear implants: A histopathologic study. Audiol Neurootol 2010;15:323-31.
22. Roland JT Jr. A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: Results with a new electrode design and insertion technique. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1325-39. (Pubitemid 41105835)
23. Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: The round window revisited. Laryngoscope 2007;117: 1397-402. (Pubitemid 47356842)
24. Schuman TA, Noble JH, Wright CG, et al. Anatomic verification of a novel method for precise intrascalar localization of cochlear implant electrodes in adult temporal bones using clinically available computed tomography. Laryngoscope 2010;120:2277-83.
25. Adunka OF, Buchman CA. Scala tympani cochleostomy I: Results of a survey. Laryngoscope 2007;117:2187-94. (Pubitemid 351339595)
26. Adunka OF, Radeloff A, Gstoettner WK, et al. Scala tympani cochleostomy II: Topography and histology. Laryngoscope 2007;117: 2195-200. (Pubitemid 351339596)
27. Wardrop P, Whinney D, Rebscher SJ, et al. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour electrodes. Hear Res 2005;203:54-67. (Pubitemid 40602815)
28. Robb RA. The biomedical imaging resource at Mayo Clinic. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:854-67. (Pubitemid 32992589)
29. Plenk H. The microscopic evaluation of hard tissue implants. In: Williams DF, ed. Techniques of Biocompatibility Testing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1986:35-81.
30. Friedland DR, Runge-Samuelson C. Soft cochlear implantation: Rationale for the surgical approach. Trends Amplif 2009;13:124-38.
31. Kiefer J, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W, et al. Conservation of lowfrequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:272-80. (Pubitemid 38580856)
32. Siemens. SOMATOM SensationVTechnical Specifications, 2011. Available at: Http://www.medical.siemens.com/webapp/wcs/stores/ servlet/ProductDisplayEq- catalogIdEe-1Ea-catTreeEe-12781Ea-langIdEe-1Ea-productIdEe-143945Ea-storeIdEe- 10001Ea-viewEe-38.htm. Accessed April 20, 2010.