Molecular systematics of the Cactaceae

Cladistics

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 470-489

  Bárcenas, Rolando T ^a   Yesson, Chris ^b,c   Hawkins, Julie A ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE QUERÉTARO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CACTUS; COHORT ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SAMPLING;

CACTACEAE; CACTEAE; CACTOIDEAE; OPUNTIOIDEAE; RHIPSALIDEAE;

EID: 80051691032     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00350.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anderson, E.F., 2001. The Cactus Family. Timber Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. Arias, S., Terrazas, T., 2006. Análisis cladístico del género Pachycereus (Cactaceae) con caracteres morfológicos. Brittonia 58, 197-216.
3. Arias, S., Terrazas, T., 2009. Taxonomic revision of Pachycereus (Cactaceae). Syst. Bot. 34, 68-83.
4. Arias, S., Terrazas, T., Cameron, K., 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of Pachycereus (Cactaceae, Pachycereeae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 28, 547-557.
5. Arias, S., Terrazas, T., Arreola-Nava, H.J., Vazquez-Sanchez, M., Cameron, K.M., 2005. Phylogenetic relationships in Peniocereus (Cactaceae) inferred from plastid DNA sequence data. J. Plant. Res. 118, 317-328.
6. Bárcenas, R.T., Hawkins, J.A., 2007. The discovery of a previously unknown isotype of Opuntia vilis ROSE (Opuntioideae: Cactaceae). Haseltonia 13, 83-88.
7. Barthlott, W., Hunt, D., 1993. Cactaceae. In: Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J.G., Bittrich, V. (Eds), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 161-197.
8. Barthlott, W., Porembski, S., 1996. Ecology and morphology of Blossfeldia liliputana (Cactaceae): a poikilohydric and almost astomate succulent. Bot. Acta 1, 161-166.
9. Bello, M.A., Bruneau, A., Forest, F., Hawkins, J.A., Lavin, M., 2009. Elusive Relationships within order Fabales: phylogenetic analyses using matK and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 34, 102-114.
10. Britton, N.L., Rose, J.N., 1919. The Cactaceae: Descriptions and Illustrations of Plants of the Cactus Family. Carnegie Institution of Washington. Publication no. 248, vol. 1-4.
11. Butterworth, C.A., 2006. Resolving "Nyffeler's Puzzle"- the intriguing taxonomic position of Blossfeldia. Haseltonia 12, 3-10.
12. Butterworth, C.A., Wallace, R.S., 2004. Phylogenetic studies of Mammillaria (Cactaceae) - insights from chloroplast sequence variation and hypothesis testing using the parametric bootstrap. Am. J. Bot. 91, 1086-1098.
13. Butterworth, C.A., Wallace, R.S., 2005. Molecular phylogenetics of the leafy cactus genus Pereskia (Cactaceae). Syst. Bot. 30, 800-808.
14. Butterworth, C.A., Cota-Sánchez, H., Wallace, R.S., 2002. Molecular systematics of tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae: Cactoideae): a phylogeny based on rpl16 intron sequence variation. Syst. Bot. 27, 257-270.
15. Buxbaum, F., 1958. The phylogenetic division of the subfamily Cereoideae. Madroño 14, 177-206.
16. Crozier, B.S., 2004. Subfamilies of Cactaceae Juss., including Blossfeldioideae subfam. nov. Phytologia 86, 52-64.
17. Drabkova, L., Kirschner, J., Vlcek, C., 2002. Comparison of seven DNA extraction and amplification protocols in historical herbarium specimens of Juncaceae. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 20, 161-175.
18. Edwards, E.J., Nyffeler, R., Donoghue, M.J., 2005. Basal cactus phylogeny: implications of Pereskia (Cactaceae) paraphyly for the transition to the cactus life form. Am. J. Bot. 92, 1177-1188.
19. Endler, J., Buxbaum, F., 1974. Die Pflanzenfamilie der Kakteen. Ein systematischer Wegweiser für Liebhaber und Züchter. Alberecht Philler Verlag, Minden, Germany.
20. Gibson, A.C., Nobel, P.S., 1986. The Cactus Primer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Gibson, A.C., Spencer, K.C., Bajaj, R., McLaughlin, J.L., 1986. The ever-changing landscape of cactus systematics. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 73, 532-555.
22. Griffith, M.P., 2002. Grusonia pulchella classification and its impacts on the genus Grusonia: morphological and molecular evidence. Haseltonia 9, 86-93.
23. Griffith, M.P., 2004. The origins of an important cactus crop, Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae): new molecular evidence. Am. J. Bot. 91, 1915-1921.
24. Griffith, M.P., Porter, J.M., 2009. Phylogeny of Opuntioideae (Cactaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 170, 107-116.
25. Harpke, D., Peterson, A., 2006. Non-concerted ITS evolution in Mammillaria (Cactaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 41, 579-593.
26. Hartmann, S., Nason, J.D., Bhattacharya, D., 2001. Extensive ribosomal DNA genic variation in the columnar cactus Lophocereus. J. Mol. Evol. 53, 124-134.
27. Hartmann, S., Nason, J.D., Bhattacharya, D., 2002. Phylogenetic origins of Lophocereus (Cactaceae) and the senita cactus-senita moth pollination mutualism Am. J. Bot. 89, 1085-1092.
28. Hunt, D., 1981. Revised classified list of the genus Mammillaria. Cact. Succ. J. Gr. Brit. 43, 41-48.
29. Hunt, D., 1986. The genera of the Cactaceae: towards a new consensus. Bradleya 4, 65-78.
30. Hunt, D., 2006. The New Cactus Lexicon: Descriptions and Illustrations of the Cactus Family. DH Books, Milborne Port, UK.
31. Johnson, L.A., Soltis, D.E., 1994. Matk DNA-sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s-str. Syst. Bot. 19, 143-156.
32. Mauseth, J.D., 2006. Blossfeldia lacks cortical bundles and persistent epidermis; is it basal within Cactoideae? Bradleya 24, 73-82.
33. Nixon, K.C., 2002. WINCLADA ver. 1.00.08. University of Ithaca, New York.
34. Nyffeler, R., 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/matK and trnL-trnF sequences. Am. J. Bot. 89, 312-326.
35. Nyffeler, R., 2007. The closest relatives of cacti: insights from phylogenetic analyses of chloroplast and mitochondrial sequences with special emphasis on relationships in the tribe Anacampseroteae. Am. J. Bot. 94, 89-101.
36. Nyffeler, R., Eggli, U., 2010. Disintegrating Portulacaceae: a new familial classification of the suborder Portulacineae (Caryophyllales) based on molecular and morphological data. Taxon 59, 227-240.
37. Nylander, J.A. 2004. MrModeltest 2.0. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
38. Porter, J.M., Kinney, M.S., Heil, K.D., 2000. Relationships between Sclerocactus and Toumeya (Cactaceae) based on chloroplast trnL-trnF sequences. Haseltonia 7, 8-23.
39. Ritz, C.M., Martins, L., Mecklenburg, R., Goremykin, V., Hellwig, F.H., 2007. The molecular phylogeny of Rebutia (Cactaceae) and its allies demonstrates the influence of paleogeography on the evolution of South American mountain cacti. Am. J. Bot. 94, 1321-1332.
40. Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P., 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572-1574.
41. Stamatakis, A., 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22 (21), 2688-2690.
42. Swofford, D.L., 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
43. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.S., Gibson, T.J., 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-sequence penalties and weighting matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680.
44. Wallace, R.S., 1995. Molecular systematic study of the Cactaceae: using DNA variation to elucidate Cactus phylogeny. Bradleya 13, 1-12.
45. Wallace, R.S., Dickie, S.L., 2002. Systematic implications of chloroplast DNA sequence variation in subfam. Opuntioideae (Cactaceae). In: Hunt, D., Taylor, N. (Eds), Studies in the Opuntioideae. David Hunt, Sherborne, UK, pp. 9-24.