Accommodation steps, target spatial frequency and refractive error

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 444-455

  Strang, Niall C ^a   Day, Mhairi ^a   Gray, Lyle S ^a   Seidel, Dirk ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Myopia; Spatial frequency; Steps

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MYOPIA; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; REFRACTION ERROR;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOPIA; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051642451     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00855.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Thomas R & Mallen EA. Refractive error, cognitive demand and nearwork-induced transient myopia. Curr Eye Res 2003; 27: 363-370.
2. Strang NC, Winn B & Gilmartin B. Repeatability of post-task regression of accommodation in emmetropia and late-onset myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994; 14: 88-91.
3. Rosenfield M & Gilmartin B. Myopia and Nearwork. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, 1998.
4. Gilmartin B & Winfield NR. The effect of topical beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on accommodation in emmetropia and myopia. Vision Res 1995; 35: 1305-1312.
5. Gilmartin B. Myopia: precedents for research in the twenty-first century. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004; 32: 305-324.
6. Gilmartin B. Autonomic correlates of nearvision in emmetropia and myopia. In: Myopia and Nearwork (Rosenfield M & Gilmartin B, editors), Butterworth-Heinemann: London, 1998, pp. 117-146.
7. Bullimore MA & Gilmartin B. The accommodative response, refractive error and mental effort: 1. The sympathetic nervous system. Doc Ophthalmol 1988; 69: 385-397.
8. McBrien NA & Millodot M. The relationship between tonic accommodation and refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 997-1004.
9. Gilmartin B & Bullimore MA. Adaptation of tonic accommodation to sustained visual tasks in emmetropia and late-onset myopia. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 22-26.
10. Abbott ML, Schmid KL & Strang NC. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 13-20.
11. Mathews S & Kruger PB. Spatiotemporal transfer function of human accommodation. Vision Res 1994; 34: 1965-1980.
12. Ciuffreda KJ & Hokoda SC. Effect of instruction and higher level control on the accommodative response spatial frequency profile. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1985; 5: 221-223.
13. Ciuffreda KJ & Hokoda SC. Spatial frequency dependence of accommodative responses in amblyopic eyes. Vision Res 1983; 23: 1585-1594.
14. Owens DA. A comparison of accommodative responsiveness and contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal gratings. Vision Res 1980; 20: 159-167.
15. Ward PA & Charman WN. Effect of pupil size on steady state accommodation. Vision Res 1985; 25: 1317-1326.
16. Ward PA. The effect of spatial frequency on steady-state accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1987; 7: 211-217.
17. Kotulak JC & Schor CM. The effects of optical vergence, contrast, and luminance on the accommodative response to spatially bandpass filtered targets. Vision Res 1987; 27: 1797-1806.
18. Heath GG. The influence of visual acuity on accommodative responses of the eye. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1956; 33: 513-524.
19. Charman WN & Tucker J. Accommodation as a function of object form. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978; 55: 84-92.
20. Tucker J & Charman WN. Effect of target content at higher spatial frequencies on the accuracy of the accommodation response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1987; 7: 137-142.
21. Tucker J, Charman WN & Ward PA. Modulation dependence of the accommodation response to sinusoidal gratings. Vision Res 1986; 26: 1693-1707.
22. Charman WN & Tucker J. Dependence of accommodation response on the spatial frequency spectrum of the observed object. Vision Res 1977; 17: 129-139.
23. Day M, Gray LS, Seidel D & Strang NC. The relationship between object spatial profile and accommodation microfluctuations in emmetropes and myopes. J Vis 2009; 9: 5.1-5.13.
24. Niwa K & Tokoro T. Influence of spatial distribution with blur on fluctuations in accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 227-232.
25. Bour LJ. The influence of the spatial distribution of a target on the dynamic response and fluctuations of the accommodation of the human eye. Vision Res 1981; 21: 1287-1296.
26. Radhakrishnan H, Pardhan S, Calver RI & O'Leary DJ. Effect of positive and negative defocus on contrast sensitivity in myopes and non-myopes. Vision Res 2004; 44: 1869-1878.
27. Collins MJ, Buehren T & Iskander DR. Retinal image quality, reading and myopia. Vision Res 2006; 46: 196-215.
28. Rosenfield M & Abraham-Cohen JA. Blur sensitivity in myopes. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 303-307.
29. Vasudevan B, Ciuffreda KJ & Wang B. Objective blur thresholds in free space for different refractive groups. Curr Eye Res 2006; 31: 111-118.
30. Charman WN & Heron G. Spatial frequency and the dynamics of the accommodation response. Optica Acta 1979; 26: 217-228.
31. Mucke S, Manahilov V, Strang NC, Seidel D & Gray LS. New type of perceptual suppression during dynamic ocular accommodation. Curr Biol 2008; 18: R555-R556.
32. Culhane HM & Winn B. Dynamic accommodation and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 1968-1974.
33. Seidel D, Gray LS & Heron G. Retinotopic accommodation responses in myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 1035-1041.
34. Seidel D, Gray LS & Heron G. The effect of monocular and binocular viewing on the accommodation response to real targets in emmetropia and myopia. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 279-285.
35. Suzumura A. Accommodation in myopia. J Aiche Med Univ Assoc 1979; 7: 6-15.
36. Schaeffel F, Wilhelm H & Zrenner E. Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. J Physiol 1993; 461: 301-320.
37. Day M, Strang NC, Seidel D & Gray LS. Technical note: effect of contact lenses on measurement of the accommodation microfluctuations. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008; 28: 91-95.
38. Chat SW & Edwards MH. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 87-100.
39. Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B & Tsujimura S. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 101-107.
40. Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Mallen EA & Tsujimura S. Continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 108-113.
41. Day M, Strang NC, Seidel D, Gray LS & Mallen EA. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006; 26: 88-96.
42. Bharadwaj SR & Schor CM. Acceleration characteristics of human ocular accommodation. Vision Res 2005; 45: 17-28.
43. Kasthurirangan S, Vilupuru AS & Glasser A. Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Res 2003; 43: 2945-2956.
44. Okada Y, Ukai K, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Iijima A & Bando T. Target spatial frequency determines the response to conflicting defocus- and convergence-driven accommodative stimuli. Vision Res 2006; 46: 475-484.
45. Mucke S, Manahilov V, Strang NC, Seidel D, Gray LS & Shahani U. Investigating the mechanisms that may underlie the reduction in contrast sensitivity during dynamic accommodation. J Vision 2010; 10: 5.
46. Bharadwaj SR & Schor CM. Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics. Vision Res 2006; 46: 1019-1037.
47. Kasthurirangan S & Glasser A. Characteristics of pupil responses during far-to-near and near-to-far accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005; 25: 328-339.
48. Vilupuru AS & Glasser A. Dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Vision Res 2002; 42: 125-141.
49. Beers AP & van der Heijde GL. Age-related changes in the accommodation mechanism. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 73: 235-242.
50. Beers AP & van der Heijde GL. In vivo determination of the biochemical properties of the component elements of the accommodation mechanism. Vision Res 1994; 34: 2897-2905.
51. Mordi JA & Ciuffreda KJ. Dynamic aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia. Vision Res 2004; 44: 591-601.
52. Campbell FW & Westheimer G. Dynamics of accommodation responses of the human eye. J Physiol 1960; 151: 285-295.
53. Vilupuru AS & Glasser A. Dynamic accommodative changes in rhesus monkey eyes assessed with A-scan ultrasound biometry. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 383-394.
54. Plainis S, Ginis HS & Pallikaris A. The effect of ocular aberrations on steady-state errors of accommodative response. J Vision 2005; 5: 466-477.
55. Day M, Seidel D, Gray LS & Strang NC. The effect of modulating ocular depth of focus upon accommodation microfluctuations in myopic and emmetropic subjects. Vision Res 2009; 49: 211-218.
56. Harb E, Thorn F & Troilo D. Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes. Vision Res 2006; 46: 2581-2592.