Characteristics of pupil responses during far-to-near and near-to-far accommodation

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 328-339

  Kasthurirangan, Sanjeev ^a   Glasser, Adrian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Main sequence; Near triad; Presbyopia; Pupillary reflex

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL REFLEX; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL STIMULATION; EYE REFRACTION; HISTOLOGY; IRIS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PUPIL; REACTION TIME;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; HUMANS; IRIS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRESBYOPIA; PUPIL; REACTION TIME; REFLEX, PUPILLARY; REFRACTION, OCULAR;

EID: 24944466550     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00293.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allen, P. M., Radhakrishnan, H. and O'Leary, D. J. (2003) Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes. Optom. Vis. Sci. 80, 245-251.
2. Backer, W. D. and Ogle, K. N. (1964) Pupillary response to fusional eye movements. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 58, 743-756.
3. Beers, A. P. A. and Van Der Heijde, G. L. (1994) In vivo determination of the biomechanical properties of the component elements of the accommodative mechanism. Vision Res. 34, 2897-2905.
4. Bharadwaj, S. R. and Schor, C. M. (2005) Acceleration characteristics of human ocular accommodation. Vision Res. 45, 17-28.
5. Bland, J. M. and Altman, D. G. (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307-310.
6. Bruce, A. S., Atchison, D. A. and Bhoola, H. (1995) Accommodation- convergence relationships and age. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36, 406-413.
7. Ciuffreda, K. J. and Kruger, P. B. (1988) Dynamics of human voluntary accommodation. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 65, 365-370.
8. Ciuffreda, K. J., Rosenfield, M. and Chen, H. W. (1997) The AC/A ratio, age and presbyopia. Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt. 17, 307-315.
9. Ejiri, M., Thompson, H. E. and O'Neill, W. D. (1969) Dynamic visco-elastic properties of the lens. Vision Res. 9, 233-244.
10. Fisher, R. F. (1969a) The significance of the shape of the lens and capsular energy changes in accommodation. J. Physiol. 201, 21-47.
11. Fisher, R. F. (1969b) Elastic constants of the human lens capsule. J. Physiol. 201, 1-19.
12. Fisher, R. F. (1971) The elastic constants of the human lens. J. Physiol. 212, 147-180.
13. Fisher, R. F. (1977) The force of contraction of the human ciliary muscle during accommodation. J. Physiol. 270, 51-74.
14. Francis, E. L., Jiang, B. C., Owens, D. A. and Tyrrell, R. A. (2003) Accommodation and vergence require effort-to-see. Optom. Vis. Sci. 80, 467-473.
15. Gamlin, P. D., Zhang, Y., Clendaniel, R. A. and Mays, L. E. (1994) Behavior of identified Edinger-Westphal neurons during ocular accommodation. J. Neurophysiol. 72, 2368-2382.
16. Gilmartin, B. (1986) A review of the role of sympathetic innervation of the ciliary muscle in ocular accommodation. Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt. 6, 23-37.
17. Gilmartin, B., Mallen, E. A. and Wolffsohn, J. S. (2002) Sympathetic control of accommodation: evidence for inter-subject variation. Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt. 22, 366-371.
18. Hunter, J. D., Milton, J. G., Ludtke, H., Wilhelm, B. and Wilhelm, H. (2000) Spontaneous fluctuations in pupil size are not triggered by lens accommodation. Vision Res. 40, 567-573.
19. Jiang, B. C. (1996) Accommodative vergence is driven by the phasic component of the accommodative controller. Vision Res. 36, 97-102.
20. Kadlecova, V., Peleška, M. and Vaško, A. (1958) Dependence on age of the diameter of the pupil in the dark. Nature 182, 1520-1521.
21. Kasthurirangan, S., Vilupuru, A. S. and Glasser, A. (2003) Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Res. 43, 2945-2956.
22. Knoll, H. A. (1949) Pupillary changes associated with accommodation and convergence. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 26, 346-357.
23. Loewenfeld, I. E. and Newsome, D. A. (1971) Iris mechanics. I. Influence of pupil size on dynamics of pupillary movements. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 71, 347-362.
24. Loewy, A. D. (1979) Neural regulation of the pupil. In: Integrative Functions of the Autonomic Nervous System (eds C. M. Brooks, K. Koizumi and A. Sato), Elsevier/North-Holladn biomedical Press, Tokyo, pp. 131-141.
25. Marg, E. and Morgan, M. W. Jr. (1949) The pupillary near reflex: the relation of pupillary diameter to accommodation and the various components of convergence. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 26, 183-224.
26. Marg, E. and Morgan, M. W. Jr. (1950) Further investigation of the pupillary near reflex: the effect of accommodation, fusional convergence and the proximity factor on pupillary diameter. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 27, 217-225.
27. Phillips, N. J., Winn, B. and Gilmartin, B. (1992) Absence of pupil response to blur-driven accommodation. Vision Res. 32, 1775-1779.
28. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. and Flannery, B. P. (2002) Modeling of data. In: Numerical Recipes in C. The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 656-706.
29. Roth, N. (1969) Effect of reduced retinal illuminance on the pupillary near reflex. Vision Res. 9, 1259-1266.
30. Ruskell, G. L. (1973) Sympathetic innervation of the ciliary muscle in monkeys. Exp. Eye. Res. 16, 183-190.
31. Schaeffel, F. (2002) Kappa and Hirschberg ratio measured with an automated video gaze tracker. Optom. Vis. Sci. 79, 329-334.
32. Schaeffel, F., Wilhelm, H. and Zrenner, E. (1993) Interindividual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. J. Physiol. 461, 301-320.
33. Schor, C. M. (1992) A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence: simulations of step and frequency responses. Optom. Vis. Sci. 69, 258-269.
34. Schor, C. M. and Kotulak, J. C. (1986) Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive. Vision Res. 26, 927-942.
35. Schor, C. M., Alexander, J., Cormack, L. and Stevenson, S. (1992) Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation. Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt. 12, 307-318.
36. Seddon, J., Sahagian, C., Glynn, R., Sperduto, R. and Gragoudas, E. (1990) Evaluation of an iris color classification system. The Eye Disorders Case-Control Study Group. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 31, 1592-1598.
37. Semmlow, J. and Stark, L. (1973) Pupil movements to light and accommodative stimulation: a comparative study. Vision Res. 13, 1087-1100.
38. Semmlow, J., Hansmann, D. and Stark, L. (1975) Variation in pupillomotor responsiveness with mean pupil size. Vision Res. 15, 85-90.
39. Shirachi, D., Liu, J., Lee, M., Jang, J., Wong, J. and Stark, L. (1978) Accommodation dynamics I. Range nonlinearity. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 55, 631-641.
40. Stakenburg, M. (1991) Accommodation without pupillary constriction. Vision Res. 31, 267-273.
41. Stark, L. R. and Atchison, D. A. (1994) Subject instructions and methods of target presentation in accommodation research. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35, 528-537.
42. Sun, F., Tauchi, P. and Stark, L. (1983) Dynamic pupillary response controlled by the pupil size effect. Exp. Neurol. 82, 313-324.
43. Takagi, M., Abe, H., Toda, H. and Usui, T. (1993) Accommodative and pupillary responses to sinusoidal target depth movement. Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt. 13, 253-257.
44. Terdiman, J., Smith, J. D. and Stark, L. (1969) Pupil response to light and electrical stimulation: static and dynamic characteristics. Brain Res. 16, 288-292.
45. Usui, S. and Stark, L. (1978) Sensory and motor mechanisms interact to control amplitude of pupil noise. Vision Res. 18, 505-507.
46. Vilupuru, A. S. and Glasser, A. (2002) Dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Vision Res. 42, 125-141.
47. Wilson, D. (1973) A centre for accommodative vergence motor control. Vision Res. 13, 2491-2503.
48. Wolffsohn, J. S., Hunt, O. A. and Gilmartin, B. (2002) Continuous measurement of accommodation in human factor applications. Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt. 22, 380-384.
49. Yamada, T. and Ukai, K. (1997) Amount of defocus is not used as an error signal in the control system of accommodation dynamics. Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt. 17, 55-60.