Retinotopic accommodation responses in myopia

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 1035-1041

  Seidel, Dirk ^a   Gray, Lyle S ^a   Heron, Gordon ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MYOPIA; OPTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; REFRACTION ERROR; RESPONSE TIME; RETINA IMAGE; RETINOTOPIC ACCOMMODATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MYOPIA; RETINA; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0037336189     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0264     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Schor CM, Alexander J, Cormack L, Stevenson S. Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992;12:307-318.
2. Phillips S, Stark L. Blur: a sufficient accommodative stimulus. Doc Ophthalmol. 1977;43:65-89.
3. Kruger PB, Pola J. Stimuli for accommodation: blur, chromatic aberration and size. Vision Res. 1986;26:957-971.
4. Kruger PB, Pola, J. Dioptric and non dioptric stimuli for accommodation: target size alone and with blur and chromatic aberration. Vision Res. 1987;27:555-567.
5. Fincham EF. The accommodation reflex and its stimulus. Br J Ophthalmol. 1951;35:381-393.
6. Stark L, Takahashi Y. Absence of an odd-error signal mechanism in human accommodation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1965;12:138-146.
7. Kruger PB, Pola J. Changing target size is a stimulus for accommodation. J Opt Soc Am A. 1985;2:1832-1835.
8. Collins G. The electronic refractionometer. Br J Physiol Opt. 1937; 1:30-42.
9. Campbell FW, Robson JG, Westheimer G. Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions. J Physiol. 1958;145: 579-594.
10. Collins M, Davis B, Wood J. Microfluctuations of steady-state accommodation and the cardiopulmonary system. Vision Res. 1995; 35:2491-2502.
11. Gray LS, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Accommodative microfluctuations and pupil diameter. Vision Res. 1993;33:2083-2090.
12. Gray LS, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Effect of target luminance on microfluctuations of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993;13:258-265.
13. Heron G, Schor C. The fluctuations of accommodation and aging. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15:445-449.
14. Miege C, Denieul P. Mean response and oscillations of accommodation for various stimulus vergences in relation to accommodation feedback control. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8:165-171.
15. Charman WN, Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8:153-64.
16. Winn B, Gilmartin B. Current perspective on microfluctuations of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 11992;12:252-256.
17. Winn B. Accommodative microfluctuations: a mechanism for steady-state control of accommodation. In: Franzen O, Richter H, Stark L, eds. Accommodation and Vergence Mechanisms in the Visual System. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser-Verlag; 2000;129-140.
18. Winn B, Pugh JR, Owens H. Arterial pulse modulates steady-state ocular accommodation. Curr Eye Res. 1990;9:971-975.
19. Gray LS, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Microfluctuations of accommodation below 0.6 Hz are likely to contribute to the maintenance of sustained accommodation [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(4):S1307. Abstract nr 2972.
20. Winn B, Charman WN, Pugh JR, et al. Perceptual detectability of ocular accommodation microfluctuations. J Opt Soc Am A. 1989; 6:459-462.
21. Rosenfield M, Abraham-Cohen JA. Blur sensitivity in myopes. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:303-306.
22. Tucker J, Charman WN. The depth-of-focus for the human eye for Snellen letters. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975;52:3-21.
23. McBrien NA, Millodot M. Amplitude of accommodation and refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:1187-1190.
24. Gwiazda J, Bauer J, Thorn F, Held R. A dynamic relationship between myopia and blur-driven accommodation in school-aged children. Vision Res. 1994;35:1299-1304.
25. McBrien NA, Millodot M. The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1986; 6:145-149.
26. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:690-694.
27. Abbott ML, Schmidt KL, Strang NC. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998;18:13-20.
28. Culhane HM, Winn B. Dynamic accommodation and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1968-1974.
29. Ciuffreda KJ, Wallis DM. Myopes show increased susceptibility to nearwork aftereffects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:1797-1803.
30. Pugh JR, Winn, B. Modification of the Canon Auto Ref R 1 for use of a continuously recording infra-red optometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8:460-464.
31. McBrien NA, Millodot M. Clinical evaluation of the Canon Autoref R-1. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985;62:768-792.
32. Pugh JR, Eadie AS, Winn B, Heron G. Power spectrum analysis in the study of ocular mechanisms. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987; 7:321-324.
33. Tucker J, Charman WN. Reaction and response times for accommodation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1979;56:490-503.
34. Charman WN. Retinal image in the human eye. Prog Retinal Res. 1982;2:1-50.
35. Ciuffreda KJ, Kruger PB. Dynamics of human voluntary accommodation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;65:365-370.
36. van der Heijde GL, Beers APA, Dubbelman M. Microfluctuations of steady-state accommodation measured with ultrasonography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:216-221.
37. Heron G, Winn B. Binocular accommodation reaction and response times for normal observers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1989; 9:176-183.
38. Strang NC, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Repeatability of post-task regression accommodation in emmetropia and late-onset myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994;14:88-91.
39. Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF. The sensitivity of the chick eye to refractive defocus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997;17:61-67.
40. Diether S, Schaeffel F. Local changes in eye growth induced by imposed local refractive error despite active accommodation. Vision Res. 1997;37:659-668.
41. Meyer C, Mueller MF, Duncker GIW, Meyer HJ. Experimental animal myopia models are applicable to human juvenile-onset myopia. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;44(suppl 1):S93-S102.