Refractive error, cognitive demand and nearwork-induced transient myopia

Current Eye Research

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 363-370

  Wolffsohn, James S ^a   Gilmartin, Bernard ^a   Thomas, Rachel ^a   Mallen, Edward A H ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Adaptation; Myopia; Visual development

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; EYE DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; LENS; MONOCULAR VISION; MYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE OF ONSET; COGNITION; HUMANS; MYOPIA; READING; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0348140996     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/ceyr.27.6.363.18190     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ong E, Ciuffreda KJ. Accommodation, Nearwork and Myopia. Santa Ana CA: Optometric Program Foundation Press; 1997.
2. Ehrlich DL. Near vision stress: Vergence adaptation and accommodative fatigue. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1987;7:353-357.
3. Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ, Levine S. Tonic accommodation, accommodative hysteresis and refractive error. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987;64:799-809.
4. Lancaster WB, Williams ER. New light on the theory of accommodation, with practical applications. Trans Amer Acad Ophth Oto-Laryng. 1914;19:170-195.
5. Ong E, Ciuffreda KJ. Nearwork-induced transient myopia. A critical review. Doc Ophthal. 1995;91:57-85.
6. Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda K. Cognitive demand and transient nearwork-induced myopia. Opt Vis Sci. 1994;71:381-385.
7. Ciuffreda KJ, Wallis DM. Myopes show increased susceptibility to nearwork after-effects. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:1797-1803.
8. Ciuffreda KJ, Lee M. Differential refractive susceptibility to sustained nearwork. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2002;22:372-379.
9. Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B, eds. Myopia and Nearwork. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.
10. Kruger PB. The effect of cognitive demand on accommodation. Am J Optom Phys Opt. 1980;57:440-445.
11. Malmstrom FV, Randle RJ. Effect of a concurrent counting task on dynamic visual accommodation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984;61:590-594.
12. Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B. The accommodative response, refractive error and mental effort: 1. The sympathetic nervous system. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988;69:385-387.
13. Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B, Royston JM. Steady-state accommodation and ocular biometry in late-onset myopes. Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;80:143-155.
14. Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B. Aspects of tonic accommodation in emmetropia and late-onset myopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987;64:499-503,
15. Smith EL. Environmentally induced refractive errors in animals. In: Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B, eds. Myopia and Nearwork. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998;57-90.
16. Ciuffreda KJ, Thunyalukul V. Myopic nearwork aftereffects in children (abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999; 40:2365.
17. Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Li RW-H, Edwards MH, Chat SW-S, Lew JK-F, Yu BS-Y. Nearwork-induced transient myopia in pre-adolescent Hong Kong Chinese. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2003;44:2284-2289.
18. Flitcroft DI. A model of the contribution of oculomotor and optical factors to emmetropization and myopia. Vis Res. 1998;38:2869-2879.
19. Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ. Model of refractive error development. Curr Eye Res. 1999;19:41-42.
20. Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ. A unifying theory of refractive error development. Bull Math Biol. 2000;62:1087-1108.
21. Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ. Models of refractive error development. In: Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ, eds. Models of the Visual System. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press; 2002;643-677.
22. Wildsoet CF. Structural correlates of myopia. In: Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B, eds. Myopia and Nearwork. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998;38-40.
23. McBrien NA, Adams DW. A longitudinal investigation of adult-onset and adult progression of myopia in an occupational group. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:321-333.
24. Sorsby A, Benjamin B, Sheridan M. Refraction and its components during the growth of the eye from the age of three. Medical Research Council Special Report Series No. 301. 1961; HMSO.
25. Larsen JS. The sagittal growth of the eye. IV Ultrasonic measurement of the depth of the anterior chamber from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmologica. 1971;49:873-886.
26. Zadnik K, Manny RE, Yu JA, Mitchell GL, Cotter SA, Quiralte JC, Shipp MD, Friedman NE, Kleinstein RN, Walker TW, Jones LA, Moeschberger ML, Mutti DO. Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:226-236.
27. Pacella R, McLellan J, Grice K, Del Bono EA, Wiggs JL, Gwiazda JE. Role of genetic factors in the etiology of juvenile-onset myopia based on a longitudinal study. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:381-386.
28. Hammond CJ, Snieder H, Gilbert CE, Spector TD. Genes and environment in refractive error: The twin eye study Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1232-1236.
29. Young TL, Ronan SM, Alvear AB, Wildenberg SC, Oetting WS, Atwood LD, Wilkin DJ, King RA. A second locus for familial high myopia maps to chromosome 12q. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;6:1419-1424.
30. Chat SWS, Edwards MH. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in children. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2001;21:87-100.
31. Mallen EAH, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Tsujimura S. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2001;21:101-107.
32. Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Mallen EAH, Tsujimura S. Continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2001;21:108-113.
33. Charman WN, Whitefoot H. Pupil diameter and the depth-of-field of the human eye as measured by laser speckle. Optica Acta. 1977;24:1211-1216.
34. Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda K, Novogrodsky L, Yu A, Gillard M. Sustained near vision does indeed induce myopia! (abstract). Optom Vis Sci. 1992;33:710.
35. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. Iowa: The Iowa State University Press; 1980.
36. Armstrong RA, Eperjesi F, Gilmartin B. The application of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to different experimental designs in optometry. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2002;22:248-256.
37. Phillips S, Shirachi D, Stark L. Analysis of accommodation response times using histogram information. Am J Optom. 1972;49:389-401.
38. Gilmartin B, Mallen EAH, Wolffsohn JS. Sympathetic control of accommodation: Evidence for inter-subject variation. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2002;22:366-371.
39. Critchley HD, Corfield DR, Chandler MP, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ. Cerebral correlates of autonomic cardiovascular arousal: A functional neuroimaging investigation in humans. J Physiol. 2000;523:259-270.
40. Hess EH, Polt JM. Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science. 1964;143:1190-1192.
41. Matthews G, Middleton W, Gilmartin B, Bullimore MA. Pupillary diameter and cognitive load. J Psychphysiol. 1991;5:265-271.
42. Fenci V, Hejl Z, Jirka J, Madlafousek J, Brod J. Changes of blood flow in forearm muscle and skin during an acute emotional stress (mental arithmetic). Clin Sci. 1959; 18:491-498.
43. Appenzeller O. The Autonomic Nervous System. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1976.
44. Rosenfield M, Abraham-Cohen JA. Blur sensitivity in myopes. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:303-307.
45. Rosenfield M, Desai R, Portello JK. Do progressing myopes show reduced accommodative responses? Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:268-273.
46. Chung K, Mohidin N, O'Leary DJ. Undercorrection of myopia enhances rather than inhibits myopia progression. Vis Res. 2002;42:2555-2559.
47. Campbell FW. The depth of field of the human eye. Optica Acta. 1957;4:157-164.