Trust in the fisheries scientific community

Marine Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 54-72

  Glenn, Helen ^a   Tingley, Diana ^a   Sánchez Maroño, Sonia ^b   Holm, Dennis ^c   Kell, Laurence ^d   Padda, Gurpreet ^d   Runar Edvardsson, Ingi ^e   Asmundsson, Johann ^e   Conides, Alexis ^f   Kapiris, Kostas ^f   Bezabih, Mintewab ^a   Wattage, Premachandra ^a   Kuikka, Sakari ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b MARINE RESEARCH DIVISION   (Spain)

^c The Research Center for Social Development   (Faroe Islands)

^d CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AKUREYRI   (Iceland)

^f Institute of Marine Biological Resources   (Greece)

^g UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Europe; Fisheries management; Fisheries science; Trust

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY SCIENCE; FUTURE PROSPECT; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER;

EUROPE;

EID: 79961208788     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Orensanz J.M., Jamieson G.S. The assessment and management of spatially structured stocks: an overview of the North Pacific symposium on invertebrate stock assessment and management. Proceedings of the North Pacific symposium on invertebrate stock assessment and management 1998, 441-460. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada. A. Campbell (Ed.).
2. Pinto da Silva P., Kitts A. Collaborative fisheries management in the Northeast US: emerging initiatives and future directions. Marine Policy 2006, 30:832-841.
3. Honneland G. Compliance in the Barents Sea fisheries. How fishermen account for conformity with rules. Marine Policy 2000, 24:11-19.
4. Levin D., Cross R., Abrams L., Lesser E. Trust and knowledge sharing: a critical combination 2002, IBM Institute for Knowledge-Based Organisations, New York.
5. Ropeik D., Gray G. Risk: a practical guide for deciding what's really safe and what's really dangerous in the world around you 2002, Houghton Mifflin, New York.
6. Frewer L. The public and effective risk communication. Toxicology Letters 2004, 149:391-397.
7. Berkes F. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1692-1702.
8. Jentoft S. Co-management-the way forward. The fisheries co-management experience: accomplishments, challenges and prospects 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. D.C. Wilson, J.R. Nielsen, P. Degnbol (Eds.).
9. Jentoft S. Fisheries co-management as empowerment. Marine Policy 2005, 29(4):1-7.
10. Neilsen J.R., Christensen A. Sharing responsibilities in Danish fisheries management; experiences and future directions. Marine Policy 2006, 30(2):181-188.
11. Noble B. Institutional criteria for co-management. Marine Policy 2000, 24(1):69-77.
12. Singleton S. Constructing cooperation: the evolution of institutions of comanagement 1998, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
13. Eamer J. Keep it simple and be relevant: the first ten years of the Arctic borderlands ecological knowledge co-op. Bridging scales and knowledge systems 2006, 185-206. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and Island Press, Washington, DC. W.V. Reid, F. Berkes, T. Wilbanks, D. Capistrano (Eds.).
14. de Vos B., Mol A.P.J. Changing trust relations within the Dutch fishing industry: the case of national study groups. Marine Policy 2010, 34:887-895.
15. de Vos B., van Tatenhove J.P.M. Trust relationships between fishers and government: new challenges for the co-management arrangements in the Dutch flatfish industry. Marine Policy 2011, 35:218-225.
16. Nunes PALD, Silvestri S, Pellizzato M., Boatto V. Regulation of the fishing activities in the lagoon of Venice, Italy: results from a socio-economic study. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 2008, 80:173-180.
17. Holmes J., Lock J. Generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management. Marine Policy 2010, 34:29-35.
18. Fukuyama F. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity 1995, Free Press, New York.
19. Wrightsman L. Measurement of philosophies of human nature. Psychological Reports 1964, 14(3):743-751.
20. Renn O., Levine D. Credibility and trust in risk communication. Communicating risks to the public 1991, 175-218. Kluwer, Boston. R.E. Kasperson, P.J. Stallen (Eds.).
21. Mayer R.C., Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20(3):709-734.
22. Robinson S.L. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly 1996, 41:574-599.
23. Whitener E.M., Brodt S.E., Korsgaard M.A., Werner J.M. Managers as initiators of trust: an exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behaviour. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(3):513-530.
24. Kramer R.M. Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology 1999, 50:569-598.
25. Rousseau D., Sitkin S.B., Burt R.S., Camerer C. Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(3):393-404.
26. Dietz G., Den Hartog D. Measuring trust inside organisations. Personnel Review 2006, 35(5):557-588.
27. McEvily B., Perrone V., Zaheer A. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science 2003, 14(1):91-103.
28. Huff L., Kelley L. Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: a seven-nation study. Organization Science 2003, 14(1):81-90.
29. Clark M.C., Payne R.L. The nature and structure of workers' trust in management. Journal of Organisational Behavior 1997, 18:205-224.
30. Gill H., Boies K., Finegan J., McNally J. Antecedents of trust: establishing a boundary condition for the relation between propensity to trust and intention to trust. Journal of Business and Psychology 2005, 19(3):287-302.
31. Williams M. In whom we trust: group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review 2001, 26(3):377-396.
32. Lewicki R., Bunker B.B. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. Trust in organisations: frontiers of theory and research 1996, 114-139. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. R.M. Kramer, T.R. Tyler (Eds.).
33. Zand D.E. Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly 1972, 17:229-239.
34. Cook J., Wall T.D. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology 1980, 53:39-52.
35. Boon S.D., Holmes J.G. The dynamics of interpersonal trust: resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. Co-operation and pro-social behaviour 1991, 190-211. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. R.A. Hinde, J. Groebel (Eds.).
36. McAllister D.J. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal co-operation in organisations. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38(1):24-59.
37. Creed W.E., Miles R.E. Trust in organisations: a conceptual framework linking organisational forms, managerial philosophies and the oportunity costs of control. Trust in organisations: frontiers of theory and research 1996, 16-38. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. R.M. Kramer, T.R. Tyler (Eds.).
38. Lewicki R., McAllister D.J., Bies R.J. Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(3):438-458.
39. Usoro A., Sharratt M., Tsui E., Shekhar S. Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management, Research & Practice 2007, 2007(5):199-212.
40. Siegrist M., Cvetkovich G. Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis 2000, 20:713-719.
41. Maeda Y., Miyahara M. Determinants of trust in industry, government, and citizen's groups in Japan. Risk Analysis 2003, 23:303-310.
42. De Ruyter K., Wetzels M., Kleijnen M. Customer adoption of e-service: an experimental study. International Journal of Service Industry Management 2001, 12:184-207.
43. Jarvenpaa S.L., Tractinsky N., Vitale M. Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management 2000, 1:45-71.
44. Nilsson A., Von Borgstede C., Biel A. Willingness to accept climate change strategies: the effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2004, 24:267-277.
45. Terwel B.W., Harinck F., Ellemers N., Daamen D. How organizational motives and communications affect public trust in organizations: the case of carbon dioxide capture and storage. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009, 29:290-299.
46. Batson C.D. Why act for the public good? Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1994, 20:603-610.
47. Batson C.D. Do pro-social motives have any business in business?. Social Justice Research 1996, 9:7-25.
48. Ellen P.S., Mohr L.A., Webb D.J. Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix?. Journal of Retailing 2000, 76:393-406.
49. Forehand M., Grier S. When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer scepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2003, 13:349-356.
50. Yoon Y., Gurhan-Canli Z., Schwarz N. The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2006, 16:377-390.
51. Kasperson R.E., Golding D., Tuler S. Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues 1992, 48(4):161-178.
52. Heath R.L. Corporate environmental risk communication: cases and practices along the Texas gulf coast. Communication Yearbook 1995, 18:255-277.
53. Hance B.J., Chess C., Sandman P.M. Improving dialogue with communities: a risk communication manual for government 1988, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ.
54. Grunig J.E., Hunt T. Managing public relations 1984, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.
55. Grunig J.E., Huang Y.H. From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship outcomes. Public relations as relationship management 2000, 23-54. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J.A. Ledingham, S.D. Bruning (Eds.).
56. Hon L. Negotiating relationships with activist publics. Ethics in public relations: responsible advocacy 2006, 53-69. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. K. Fitzpatrick, C. Bronstein (Eds.).
57. Bowen S.A. Expansion of ethics as the tenth generic principle of excellence: a Kantian theory and model for managing ethical issues. Journal of Public Relations Research 2004, 16(1):65-92.
58. Gower K.K. Truth and transparency. Ethics in public relations: responsible advocacy 2006, 89-105. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. K. Fitzpatrick, C. Bronstein (Eds.).
59. Palenchar M.J., Heath R.L. Strategic risk communication: adding value to society. Public Relations Review 2007, 33(2):120-129.
60. Schriesheim C.A., Eisenbach R.J., Hill K.D. The effect of negation and polar opposite item reversals on questionnaire reliability and validity: an experimental investigation. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1991, 41:1101-1114.
61. Cummings L.L., Bromiley P. The Organizational trust inventory (OTI): development and validation. Trust in organisations: frontiers of theory and research 1996, 302-331. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. R.M. Kramer, T.R. Tyler (Eds.).
62. Blois K.J. Trust in business to business relationships: an evaluation of its status. Journal of Management Studies 1999, 36(2):197-215.
63. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea The ICES strategic plan. DK-1261 2008, ICES, Copenhagen, Denmark, ICES, Copenhagen, Denmark, 〈www.ices.dk/iceswork/strategic%20plan-final.pdf〉, 11 November.
64. Dawes J. Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International Journal of Market Research 2008, 50(1):61-77.
65. Rodgers L., Nicewander W.A. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician 2008, 42(1):59-66.
66. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
67. Bostrom A. Future risk communication. Futures 2003, 35:553-573.
68. Pidgeon N., Hood C., Jones D., Turner B., Gibson R. Risk perception in risk: analysis perception and management. Report of a Royal Society Study Group 1992, Royal Society, London.