Force probing cell shape changes to molecular resolution

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 444-450

  Stewart, Martin P ^a,b   Toyoda, Yusuke ^b   Hyman, Anthony A ^b   Muller, Daniel J ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LATRUNCULIN A; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; SODIUM PROTON EXCHANGE PROTEIN;

ALPHA HELIX; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL SHAPE; CELL VOLUME; LIGAND BINDING; MITOSIS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; REVIEW; SINGLE MOLECULE FORCE SPECTROSCOPY; SPECTROSCOPY; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

BIOMECHANICS; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SHAPE; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MITOSIS; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 79961172119     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.05.001     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Bustamante C., et al. Mechanical processes in biochemistry. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004, 73:705-748.
2. Hinterdorfer P., Dufrene Y.F. Detection and localization of single molecular recognition events using atomic force microscopy. Nat. Methods 2006, 3:347-355.
3. Evans E.A., Calderwood D.A. Forces and bond dynamics in cell adhesion. Science 2007, 316:1148-1153.
4. Kedrov A., et al. Deciphering molecular interactions of native membrane proteins by single-molecule force spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2007, 36:233-260.
5. Borgia A., et al. Single-molecule studies of protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77:101-125.
6. Gerber C., Lang H.P. How the doors to the nanoworld were opened. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 1:3-5.
7. Neuman K.C., Nagy A. Single-molecule force spectroscopy: optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force microscopy. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:491-505.
8. Muller D.J., Dufrene Y.F. Atomic force microscopy as a multifunctional molecular toolbox in nanobiotechnology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3:261-269.
9. Moffitt J.R., et al. Recent advances in optical tweezers. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77:205-228.
10. Muller D.J., et al. Force probing surfaces of living cells to molecular resolution. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5:383-390.
11. Dufrene Y.F., et al. Five challenges to bringing single-molecule force spectroscopy into living cells. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:123-127.
12. Helenius J., et al. Single-cell force spectroscopy. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:1785-1791.
13. Sheetz M.P. Cell control by membrane-cytoskeleton adhesion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2:392-396.
14. Vogel V., Sheetz M.P. Cell fate regulation by coupling mechanical cycles to biochemical signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:38-46.
15. Fletcher D.A., Mullins R.D. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 2010, 463:485-492.
16. Israelachvili J. Intermolecular and Surface Forces 1991, Academic Press Limited.
17. Kedrov A., et al. Locating ligand binding and activation of a single antiporter. EMBO Rep. 2005, 6:668-674.
18. Harris A. Location of cellular adhesions to solid substrata. Dev. Biol. 1973, 35:97-114.
19. Cramer L.P., Mitchison T.J. Investigation of the mechanism of retraction of the cell margin and rearward flow of nodules during mitotic cell rounding. Mol. Biol. Cell 1997, 8:109-119.
20. Eggert U.S., et al. Animal cytokinesis: from parts list to mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75:543-566.
21. Barr F.A., Gruneberg U. Cytokinesis: placing and making the final cut. Cell 2007, 131:847-860.
22. Straight A.F., et al. Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II Inhibitor. Science 2003, 299:1743-1747.
23. Miller A.L., Bement W.M. Regulation of cytokinesis by Rho GTPase flux. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:71-77.
24. Carvalho A., et al. Structural memory in the contractile ring makes the duration of cytokinesis independent of cell size. Cell 2009, 137:926-937.
25. Pollard T.D. Mechanics of cytokinesis in eukaryotes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010, 22:50-56.
26. Yang L., et al. Modeling cellular deformations using the level set formalism. BMC Syst. Biol. 2008, 2:68.
27. Rappaport T. Cytokinesis in Animal Cells 1996, Cambridge University Press.
28. Matzke R., et al. Direct, high-resolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3:607-610.
29. Gibson M.C., et al. The emergence of geometric order in proliferating metazoan epithelia. Nature 2006, 442:1038-1041.
30. Thery M., Bornens M. Cell shape and cell division. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2006, 18:648-657.
31. Kunda P., Baum B. The actin cytoskeleton in spindle assembly and positioning. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19:174-179.
32. Maddox A.S., Burridge K. RhoA is required for cortical retraction and rigidity during mitotic cell rounding. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160:255-265.
33. Carreno S., et al. Moesin and its activating kinase Slik are required for cortical stability and microtubule organization in mitotic cells. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 180:739-746.
34. Kunda P., et al. Moesin controls cortical rigidity, cell rounding, and spindle morphogenesis during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:91-101.
35. McConnell C.H. The mitosis found in hydra. Science 1930, 72:170.
36. Lechler T., Fuchs E. Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin. Nature 2005, 437:275-280.
37. Stewart M.P., et al. Hydrostatic pressure and the actomyosin cortex drive mitotic cell rounding. Nature 2011, 469:226-230.
38. Krendel M., et al. Nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1 mediates cross-talk between microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:294-301.
39. Mitchison T.J., et al. Implications of a poroelastic cytoplasm for the dynamics of animal cell shape. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008, 19:215-223.
40. Blaser H., et al. Migration of zebrafish primordial germ cells: a role for myosin contraction and cytoplasmic flow. Dev. Cell 2006, 11:613-627.
41. Paluch E., Heisenberg C.P. Biology and physics of cell shape changes in development. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:R790-R799.
42. Bereiter-Hahn J. Mechanics of crawling cells. Med. Eng. Phys. 2005, 27:743-753.
43. Fackler O.T., Grosse R. Cell motility through plasma membrane blebbing. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:879-884.
44. Keren K., et al. Intracellular fluid flow in rapidly moving cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:1219-1224.
45. Dietz H., Rief M. Protein structure by mechanical triangulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:1244-1247.
46. Kedrov A., et al. Differentiating ligand and inhibitor interactions of a single antiporter. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 362:925-932.
47. Kedrov A., et al. Examining the dynamic energy landscape of an antiporter upon inhibitor binding. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 375:1258-1266.
48. Kedrov A., et al. Probing the interactions of carboxy-atractyloside and atractyloside with the yeast mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier. Structure 2010, 18:39-46.
49. Cisneros D.A., et al. Transducer binding establishes localized interactions to tune sensory rhodopsin II. Structure 2008, 16:1206-1213.
50. Bippes C.A., et al. Substrate binding tunes conformational flexibility and kinetic stability of an amino acid antiporter. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:18651-18663.
51. Putney L.K., Barber D.L. Na-H exchange-dependent increase in intracellular pH times G2/M entry and transition. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:44645-44649.
52. Johnson J.D., Epel D. Intracellular pH and activation of sea urchin eggs after fertilisation. Nature 1976, 262:661-664.
53. Mechanisms and Significance of Cell Volume Regulation 2006, Karger. F. Lang (Ed.).
54. Alexander R.T., Grinstein S. Na+/H+ exchangers and the regulation of volume. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 2006, 187:159-167.
55. Wehner F., et al. Cell volume regulation: osmolytes, osmolyte transport, and signal transduction. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003, 148:1-80.
56. Padan E., et al. Na(+)/H(+) antiporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1505:144-157.
57. Hunte C., et al. Structure of a Na+/H+ antiporter and insights into mechanism of action and regulation by pH. Nature 2005, 435:1197-1202.
58. Muller D.J., Engel A. Atomic force microscopy and spectroscopy of native membrane proteins. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2:2191-2197.
59. Alsteens D., et al. Force-induced formation and propagation of adhesion nanodomains in living fungal cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:20744-20749.
60. Krieg M., et al. Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:429-436.
61. Lam W.A., et al. Mechanics and contraction dynamics of single platelets and implications for clot stiffening. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10:61-66.
62. Cuerrier C.M., et al. Real-time monitoring of angiotensin II-induced contractile response and cytoskeleton remodeling in individual cells by atomic force microscopy. Pflugers Arch. 2009, 457:1361-1372.
63. Kusche-Vihrog K., et al. C-reactive protein makes human endothelium stiff and tight. Hypertension 2011, 57:231-237.
64. Roduit C., et al. Elastic membrane heterogeneity of living cells revealed by stiff nanoscale membrane domains. Biophys. J. 2008, 94:1521-1532.
65. Rosenbluth M.J., et al. Slow stress propagation in adherent cells. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:6052-6059.
66. Iyer S., et al. Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4:389-393.
67. Arboleda-Estudillo Y., et al. Movement directionality in collective migration of germ layer progenitors. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:161-169.
68. Strilic B., et al. Electrostatic cell-surface repulsion initiates lumen formation in developing blood vessels. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:2003-2009.
69. Prass M., et al. Direct measurement of the lamellipodial protrusive force in a migrating cell. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 174:767-772.
70. Chaudhuri O., et al. Reversible stress softening of actin networks. Nature 2007, 445:295-298.
71. Schillers H., et al. Real-time monitoring of cell elasticity reveals oscillating myosin activity. Biophys. J. 2010, 99:3639-3646.