Parafoveal Preview During Reading: Effects of Sentence Position

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1221-1238

  White, Sarah J ^a   Warren, Tessa ^b   Reichle, Erik D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

E Z Reader; Eye movements; Parafoveal preview; Reading; Wrap up effects

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; READING; REFERENCE VALUE; RETINA FOVEA; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; FIXATION, OCULAR; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; READING; REFERENCE VALUES; SACCADES; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79961137681     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022190     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aaronson D., Scarborough H.S. Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1976, 2:56-70.
2. Balota D.A., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology 1985, 17:364-390.
3. Clifton C., Staub A., Rayner K. Eye movements in reading words and sentences. Eye movements: A window on mind and brain 2007, 341-372. Elsevier, Amsterdam. R. van Gompel (Ed.).
4. Drieghe D., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:954-969.
5. Drieghe D., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1239-1249.
6. Engbert R., Nuthmann A., Richter E.M., Kliegl R. SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review 2005, 112:777-813.
7. Ferreira G., Apel J., Henderson J.M. Taking a new look at nothing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:406-410.
8. Green D.W., Mitchell D.C., Hammond E.J. The scheduling of text integration processes in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1981, 33A:455-464.
9. Hemforth B., Konieczny L., Scheepers D. On reanalysis: Head position and syntactic complexity. First analysis, reanalysis and repair 1994, 23-50. University of Freiburg. B. Hemforth, L. Konieczny, C. Scheepers, G. Strube (Eds.).
10. Henderson J.M., Ferreira F. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1990, 16:417-429.
11. Hill R., Murray W. Commas and spaces: Effects of punctuation on eye movements and sentence processing. Reading as a perceptual process 2000, 565-589. Elsevier, Amsterdam. A. Kennedy, D. Heller, J. Pynte (Eds.).
12. Hirotani M., Frazier L., Rayner K. Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54:425-443.
13. Hyönä, J. (In press). Foveal and parafoveal processing during reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14. Hyönä J., Bertram R., Pollatsek A. Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:523-532.
15. Inhoff A.W., Rayner K. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics 1986, 40:431-439.
16. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 1980, 87:329-354.
17. Kennedy A. Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 53A:429-455.
18. Kennison S.M., Clifton C. Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 1995, 21:68-81.
19. Kliegl R., Nuthmann A., Engbert R. Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:12-35.
20. McConkie G.W., Rayner K. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1975, 17:578-586.
21. McConkie G.W., Rayner K. Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic society 1976, 8:365-368.
22. Mitchell D.C., Green D.W. The effects of context and content on immediate processing in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1978, 30:609-636.
23. Myung I.J. The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2000, 44:190-204.
24. Pollatsek A., Lesch M., Morris R.K., Rayner K. Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:148-162.
25. Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D., Rayner K. Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 52:1-56.
26. Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D., Rayner K. Attention to one word at a time is still a viable hypothesis: Rejoinder to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1496-1500.
27. Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D., Rayner K. Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: A response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005). Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1485-1489.
28. Rayner K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology 1975, 7:65-81.
29. Rayner K. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1986, 41:211-236.
30. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
31. Rayner K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1457-1506.
32. Rayner K., Balota D.A., Pollatsek A. Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1986, 40:473-483.
33. Rayner K., Kambe G., Duffy S.A. The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 53A:1061-1080.
34. Rayner K., Sereno S.C., Morris R.K., Schmauder A.R., Clifton C. Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 1989, 4:21-49.
35. Reichle, E. D. (In press). Serial attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 1998, 105:125-157.
37. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2003, 26:445-526.
38. Reichle E.D., Warren T., McConnell K. Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher-level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:1-20.
39. Schilling H.E.H., Rayner K., Chumbley J.I. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition 1998, 26:1270-1281.
40. Schroyens W., Vitu F., Brysbaert M., d'Ydewalle G. Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1999, 52A:1021-1046.
41. Warren T., Reichle E.D., Patson N.D. Lexical and post-lexical effects on eye movements in reading. Journal of Eye Movement Research 2011, 4(3):1-10.
42. Warren T., White S.J., Reichle E.D. Investigating the causes of wrap-up effects: Evidence from eye movements and E-Z Reader. Cognition 2009, 111:132-137.
43. White S.J. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:205-223.
44. White S.J., Bertram R., Hyönä J. Semantic processing of previews within compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 2008, 34:988-993.
45. White S.J., Rayner K., Liversedge S.P. Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A re-examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:891-896.