The efficiency of cell fusion-based reprogramming is affected by the somatic cell type and the in vitro age of somatic cells

Cellular Reprogramming

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 331-344

  Tat, Pollyanna Agnes ^a   Sumer, Huseyin ^a   Pralong, Daniele ^a   Verma, Paul John ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG;

ADIPOSE TISSUE CELL; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL AGING; CELL FUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FIBROBLAST; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; IN VITRO STUDY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NEURAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENESCENCE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOMATIC CELL; TRANSGENE;

ANIMALS; CELL FUSION; CELLS, CULTURED; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; TRANSGENES;

EID: 79961090785     PISSN: 21524971     EISSN: 21524998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cell.2011.0002     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anders, G. J. P. A., Wierda, J., Nienhaus, A. J., et al. (1978). Time and cell systems as variables in fusion experiments with polyethylene glycol. Hum. Genet. 42, 319-322. (Pubitemid 8376190)
2. Banito, A., Rashid, S. T., Acosta, J. C., et al. (2009). Senescence impairs successful reprogramming to pluripotent stem cells. Genes Dev. 23, 2134-2139.
3. Bhutani, N., Brady, J. J., Damian, M., et al. (2010). Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation. Nature 463, 1042-1047.
4. Blelloch, R., Wang, Z., Meissner, A., et al. (2006). Reprogramming efficiency following somatic cell nuclear transfer is influenced by the differentiation and methylation state of the donor nucleus. Stem Cells 24, 2007-2013. (Pubitemid 44477125)
5. Cowan, C. A., Atienza, J., Melton, D. A., et al. (2005). Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells after fusion with human embryonic stem cells. Science 309, 1369-1373. (Pubitemid 41209363)
6. Davidson, R. L., and Gerald, P. S. (1976). Improved techniques for the induction of mammalian cell hybridisation by polyethylene glycol. Somatic Cell Genet. 2, 165-176.
7. Davidson, R. L., and Gerald, P. S. (1977). Mammalian Somatic Cell Hybridization by Polyethylene Glycol. (Academic Press, London).
8. Deleyrolle, L. P., and Reynolds, B. A. (2009). Isolation, expansion and differentiation of adult mammalian neural stem and progenitor cells using the neurosphere assay. In Methods in Molecular Biology, Neural Cell Transplantation. N. J. Scolding and D. Gordon, eds. (Humana Press, New York), pp. 91-101.
9. Do, J. T., and Scholer, H. R. (2004). Nuclei of embryonic stem cells reprogram somatic cells. Stem Cells 22, 941-949. (Pubitemid 39507081)
10. Do, J. T., and Scholer, H. R. (2005). Comparison of neurosphere cells with cumulus cells after fusion with embryonic stem cells: reprogramming potential. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 17, 143-149. (Pubitemid 40103672)
11. Do., J. T., Han, D. W., Gentile, L., et al. (2007). Erasure of cellular memory by fusion with pluripotent cells. Stem Cells 4, 1013-1020. (Pubitemid 46572599)
12. Gridina, M. M., and Serov, O. L. (2010). Bidirectional reprogramming of mouse embryonic stem cell/fibroblast hybrid cells is initiated at the heterokaryon stage. Cell Tissue Res. 342, 377-389.
13. Han, D. W., Do., J. T., Gentile, L., et al. (2008). Pluripotential reprogramming of the somatic genome in hybrid cells occurs with the first cell cycle. Stem Cells 26, 445-454. (Pubitemid 351413605)
14. Hasegawa, K., Zhang, P., Wei, Z., et al. (2010). Comparison of reprogramming efficiency between transduction of reprogramming factors, cell-cell fusion, and cytoplast fusion. Stem Cells 28, 1338-1348.
15. Kim, J. B., Zaehres, H., Wu, G., et al. (2008). Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors. Nature 454, 646-650.
16. Lane, R. D., Crissman, R. S., and Lachman, M. F. (1984). Comparison of polyethylene glycols as fusogens for producing lymphocyte-myeloma hybrids. J. Immunol. Methods 72, 71-76. (Pubitemid 14091995)
17. Li, H., Collado, M., Villasante, A., et al. (2009). The Ink4/Arf locus is a barrier for iPS cell reprogramming. Nature 460, 1136-1139.
18. Li, X., Tremoleda, J. L., and Allen, W. R. (2003). Effect of the number of passages of fetal and adult fibroblasts on nuclear remodelling and first embryonic division in reconstructed horse oocytes after nuclear transfer. Reproduction 125, 535-542. (Pubitemid 36519548)
19. Matveeva, N. M., Shilov, A. G., Kaftanovskaya, E. M., et al. (1998). In vitro and in vivo study of pluripotency in intraspecific hybrid cells obtained by fusion of murine embryonic stem cells with splenocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 50, 128-138. (Pubitemid 28234560)
20. Miura, K., Okada, Y., Aoi, T., et al. (2009). Variation in the safety of induced pluripotent stem cell lines. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 743-745.
21. Mizutani, E., Ohta, H., Kishigami, S., et al. (2006). Developmental ability of cloned embryos from neural stem cells. Reproduction 132, 849-857. (Pubitemid 46040655)
22. Mizutani, E., Tetsuo, O., Li, C., et al. (2008). Propagation of senescent mice using nuclear transfer embryonic stem cell lines. Genesis 46, 478-483.
23. Nagy, A., Gertsenstein, M., Vintersten, K., et al. (2003). Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York).
24. Okita, K., Ichisaka, T., and Yamanaka, S. (2007). Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448, 313-317. (Pubitemid 47080336)
25. Pereira, C. F., Terranova, R. M., Ryan, N. K., et al. (2008). Heterokaryon-based reprogramming of human b lymphocytes for pluripotency requires Oct4 but not Sox2. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000170.
26. Polo, J. M., Liu, S., Figueroa, M. E., et al. (2010). Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 848-855.
27. Pontecorvo, G. (1975). Production of mammalian somatic cell hybrids by means of polyethylene glycol treatment. Somatic Cell Genet. 1.
28. Pralong, D., Lim, M. L., Vassiliev, I., et al. (2005). Tetraploid embryonic stem cells contribute to the inner cell mass of mouse blastocysts. Cloning Stem Cells 7, 272-278. (Pubitemid 43121861)
29. Radomska, H. S., and Eckhardt, L. A. (1995). Mammalian cell fusion in an electroporation device. J. Immunol. Methods 188, 209-217. (Pubitemid 26018967)
30. Roh, S., Shim, H., Hwang, W., et al. (2000). In vitro development of green fluorescnet protein (GFP) transgenic bovine embryos after nuclear transfer using different cell cycles and passages of fetal fibroblasts. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 12, 1-6. (Pubitemid 32009795)
31. Roobrouck, V. D., Ulloa-Montoya, F., and Verfaillie, C. M. (2008). Self-renewal and differentiation capacity of young and aged stem cells. Exp. Cell Res. 314, 1937-1944.
32. Silva, J., Chambers, I., Pollard, S., et al. (2006). Nanog promotes transfer of pluripotency after cell fusion. Nature 441, 997-1001. (Pubitemid 43980355)
33. Skelley, A. M., Kirak, O., Suh, H., Jaenisch, R., and Voldman, J. (2009). Microfluidic control of cell pairing and fusion. Nat. Methods 6, 147-152.
34. Sullivan, S., Pells, S., Hooper, M., et al. (2006a). Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by embryonic stem cells is affected by cell cycle stage. Cloning Stem Cells 8, 174-188. (Pubitemid 44735172)
35. Sullivan, S., Waterfall, M., Gallagher, E. J., et al. (2006b). Quantification of Cell Fusion by Flow Cytometry, Vol. 325 (Springer, Totowa, NJ).
36. Sumer, H., Jones, K. L., Liu, J., et al. (2009). Transcriptional changes in somatic cells recovered from embryonic stem-somatic heterokaryons. Stem Cells Dev. 18, 1361-1368.
37. Sumer, H., Nicholls, C., Liu, J., et al. (2011). Comparison of reprogramming ability of mouse ES and iPS cells measured by somatic cell fusion. Int. J. Dev. Biol. (in press).
38. Szabo, P. E., Hubner, K., Scholer, H., et al. (2002). Allele-specific expression of imprinted genes in mouse migratory primordial germ cells. Mech. Dev. 115, 157-160. (Pubitemid 34615682)
39. Tada, M., Takahama, Y., Abe, K., et al. (2001). Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells. Curr. Biol. 11, 1553-1558. (Pubitemid 32931020)
40. Takahashi, K., Okita, K., Nakagawa, M., et al. (2007). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from fibroblasts. Nat. Protocols 2, 3081-3089.
41. Tat, P. A., Sumer, H., Jones, K. J., et al. (2010). The efficient generation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from adult mouse adipose tissue-derived and neural stem cells. Cell Transplant. 19, 525-536.
42. Tokuzawa, Y., Kaiho, E., Maruyama, M., et al. (2003). Fbx15 is a novel target of Oct3/4 but is dispensable for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and mouse development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 2699-2708. (Pubitemid 36403071)
43. Utikal, J., Polo, J. M., Stadtfeld, M., et al. (2009). Immortalization eliminates a roadblock during cellular reprogramming into iPS cells. Nature 460, 1145-1148.
44. Wong, C. C., Gaspar-Maia, A., Ramalho-Santos, M., et al. (2008). High efficiency stem cell fusion-mediated assay reveals Sall4 as an enhancer of reprogramming. PLoS ONE 3, e1955.
45. Yamazaki, Y., Makino, H., Hanaguchi-Hamada, K., et al. (2001). Assessment of the developmental totipotency of neural cells in the cerebral cortex of mouse embryo by nuclear transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14022-14026. (Pubitemid 33116017)
46. Yeom, Y. L., Fuhrmann, G., Ovitt, C. E., et al. (1996). Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells. Development 122, 881-894. (Pubitemid 26095994)
47. Yu, J., Vodyanik, M. A., He, P., et al. (2006). Human embryonic stem cells reprogram myeloid precursors following cell-cell fusion. Stem Cells 24, 168-176.
48. Zhao, X.-y., Li, W., Lv, Z., et al. (2009). iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation. Nature 461, 86-90.
49. Zimmermann, U. (1982). Electric field-mediated fusion and related electrical phenomena. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 694, 227-277.