Contextual assessment in science education: Background, issues, and policy

Science Education

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 820-851

  Klassen, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748062000     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20150     Document Type: Article

References (131)

1. Aschbacher, P. R. (1991). Performance assessment: State activity, interest, and concerns. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 275-288.
2. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
3. Baker, E. L. (2001). Testing and assessment: A progress report. Educational Assessment, 7(1), 1-12.
4. Baker, E., O'Neil, H. F., Jr., & Linn, R. L. (1994). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17(4), 332-353.
5. Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637.
6. Baume, D., & Yorke, M. (2002). The reliability of assessment by portfolio on a course to develop and accredit teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 1-25.
7. Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536-553.
8. Berenson, S. B., & Carter, G. S. (1995). Changing assessment practices in science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 182-186.
9. Black, P. (1995). Assessment and feedback in science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21(3), 257-279.
10. Black, P. (1998). Assessment by teachers and the improvement of students' learning. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 811-822). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Black, P. J. (1993). Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21, 49-97.
12. Black, S. (1993, February). Portfolio assessment. The Executive Educator, pp. 28-31.
13. Bloom, J. W. (1992). Contexts of meaning and conceptual integration: How children understand and learn. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 177-194). New York: State University of New York Press.
14. Boulding, K. (1979). In praise of inefficiency. Graduate Woman, 73, 28-30.
15. Broadfoot, P. (2002). Editorial. Beware the consequences of assessment! Assessment in Education, 9(3), 285-288.
16. Brookhart, S. M. (2001). Effects of the classroom assessment environment on mathematics and science achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 323-330.
17. Bruner, J. S. (1963). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Champagne, A. B., & Newell, S. T. (1992). Directions for research and development: Alternative methods of assessing scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 841-860.
19. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's verbal behavior. Language, 35(1), 26-58.
21. Chudowsky, N., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2003). Large-scale assessments that support learning: What Will it take? Theory Into Practice, 42(1), 75-83.
22. Churchland, P. M. (1992). A deeper unity: Some feyerabendian themes in neurocomputational form. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. XV: Cognitive models of science (pp. 341-363). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23. Corsini, R. J. (Ed.) (1994). Encyclopedia of psychology (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
24. Crotty, E. K. (1994). The role of cooperative learning in an authentic performance assessment approach. Social Science Record, 31(1), 38-41.
25. Dalziel, J. (1998). Using marks to assess student performance: Some problems and alternatives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 351-366.
26. Delandshire, G. (2001). Implicit theories, unexamined assumptions and the status quo of educational assessment. Assessment in Education, 8(2), 113-133.
27. DeVries, R. (2000). Vygotsky, Piaget, and education: A reciprocal assimilation of theories and educational practices. New Ideas in Psychology, 18, 187-213.
28. Doolittle, P. E. (1997). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development as a theoretical foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8(1), 83-103.
29. Duschl, R., Hamilton, R., & Grandy, R. E. (1990). Psychology and epistemology: Match or mismatch when applied to science education? International Journal of Science Education, 12(3), 230-243.
30. Ebenezer, J. V., & Gaskell, P. J. (1995). Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry. Science Education, 79(1), 1-17.
31. Edmondson, K. M. (2000). Assessing science understanding through concept maps. In J. D. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 22-33). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Academic Press.
32. Erickson, G., Bartley, A., Blake, L., Carlisle, R., Meyer, K., & Stavey, R. (1992). British Columbia Assessment of Science 1991 Technical Report II: Student performance component. Victoria, Canada: British Columbia Ministry of Education.
33. Erickson, G. L., & Meyer, K. (1998). Performance assessment tasks in science: What are they measuring? In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 845-865). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Ferrara, S., Huynh, H., & Baghi, H. (1997). Contextual characteristics of locally dependent opon-ended item clusters in a large-scale performance assessment. Applied Measurement in Education. 10(2), 123-144.
35. Frederiksen, N. (1984). The real test bias. American Psychologist, 39, 193-201.
36. Gagne, R., Briggs, L., & Wager, W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.), Fort Worth. TX: HBJ College.
37. Gagne, R. M. (1977), The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (3rd ed.). New York: Holt. Reinhart and Winston.
38. Gardner, H. (1992). The rhetoric of school reform: Complex theories vs. the quick fix. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 38(35), B1-B2.
39. Gay, L. R. (1996), Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. Gearhart, M., & Herman, J. L. (1995. Winter). Portfolio assessment: Whose work is it? Evaluation Comment. pp. 1-16.
41. Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the complex, New York: W. H. Freeman.
42. Gennovese, J. E. C. (2003). Piagel, pedagogy, and evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary Psychology, 1, 127-137.
43. Giere, R. N. (1992). Introduction: Cognitive models of science. In R. N. Giere (Bd.). Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. XV: Cognitive models of science (pp. xv-xxviii). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
44. Gilman, D. A. (1997). This issue... A funny thing happened on the way to statewide performance assessment. Contemporary Education. 69(1), 4-5.
45. Gitomer, D. H., & Duschl, R. A. (1995). Moving toward a portfolio culture in science education. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Kds.). Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 299-326), Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Glasersfeld, E. von (1990). Environment and communication. In L. P. Steffe & T. Wood (Eds.). Transforming children's mathematics education: International perspectives (pp. 30-38). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Green, K. E. (1986). Fundamental measurement: A review and application of additive conjoint measurement in educational testing. Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 141-147.
48. Gunstone, R., Gray, C. M. R., & Searle, P. (1992). Some long-term effects of uninformed conceptual change. Science Education, 76(2), 175-197.
49. Gunzenhauser, M. G. (2003). High-stakes testing and the default philosophy of education. Theory Into Practice. 42(1), 51-58.
50. Hamilton, L. S., Nussbaum, E. M., & Snow, R. E. (1997). Interview procedures for validating science assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 10(2), 181-200.
51. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Harlen, W., & Crick, R. D. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education, 10(2), 169-207.
53. Harmon, M. (1995). The changing role of assessment in evaluating science education reform. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 65, 31-51.
54. Hoskins, K. (1968). The examination, disciplinary power and rational schooling. History of Education, 8, 135- 146.
55. Houts, C., & Haddock, C. K. (1992). Answers to philosophical and sociological uses of psychologism in science studies: A behavioural psychology of science. In R. N. Giere, (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. XV: Cognitive models of science (pp. 367-399). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
56. Jaeger, R. M. (1989). Certification of student competence. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 485-514), New York: Macmillan.
57. Khattri, N., Reeve, A. L., & Kane, M. B. (1998). Principles and practices of performance assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661-667.
59. Klein, S. P., Stecher, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., McCaffrey, D., Ormseth, T., Bell, R. M., Comfort, K., & Othman, A. R. (1998). Analytic versus holistic scoring of science performance tasks. Applied Measurement in Education, 11(2), 121-137.
60. Kohn, A. (1999). From degrading to de-grading. The High School Magazine. 6(5), 38-43.
61. Koretz, D. (1998). Large-scale portfolio assessments in the US: Evidence pertaining to the quality of measurement. Assessment in Education. 5(3), 309-334.
62. Koul, R., & Dana, R. (1997). Contexlualized science for teaching science and technology. Interchange. 28(2&3), 121-144.
63. Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
64. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
65. Leon, S., & Elias, M. (1998). A comparison of portfolio, performance, and traditional assessment in the middle school. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 21(2), 21-37.
66. Linn, R. L. (2001), A century of standardized testing: Controversies and pendulum swings. Educational Assessment, 7(1), 29-38.
67. Lissitz, R. W. (1997). Statewide performance assessment: Continuity, context, and concerns. Contemporary Education, 69(1), 15-19.
68. Lomask, M. S., Baron, J. B., & Greig, J. (1998). Large-scale science performance assessment in Connecticut: Challenges and resolutions. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 823-844). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
69. Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (1993, April). Testing as a mechanism of public policy: A brief history and description. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 26, 6-10.
70. Manitoba Education and Training. (1997). Reporting on student progress and achievement: A policy handbook for teachers, administrators, and parents. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Education and Training.
71. Manitoba Education and Youth. (2003). Senior 2 science: A foundation for implementation. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Education and Youth.
72. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
73. Marzano, R. J. (2003). Using data: Two wrongs and a right. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 56-60.
74. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
75. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226-232.
76. McClure, J. R., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. K. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 475-492.
77. McMillan, M. (1999). The troubling consequences of the ABCs: Who's accountable? Raleigh, NC: Common Sense Foundation.
78. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.
79. Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355-383.
80. Mill, J. S. (1892/1859). On liberty. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
81. Moss, P. A. (1994, March). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 5-12.
82. Naizer, G. L. (1997). Validity and reliability issues of performance-portfolio assessment. Action in Teacher Education, 18(4), 1-9.
83. Novak, J. (1991). Clarify with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 58(7), 45-49.
84. Novak, J. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
85. Novak, J. D. (1977). An alternative to Piagetian psychology for science and mathematics education. Science Education, 61(4), 453-477.
86. O'Neill, J. (1992). Putting performance assessment to the test. Educational Leadership, 49(8), 14-19.
87. Odell, C. W. (1928). Traditional examinations and new-type tests. New York: Century.
88. Pallrand, G. J. (1996). The relationship of assessment to knowledge development in science education. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(4), 315-318.
89. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
90. Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 703-732), New York: Wiley.
91. Piaget, J. (1970/1968). Genetic epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.
92. Prodromou, L. (1995). The backwash effect: From testing to learning. ELT Journal, 49(1), 13-25.
93. Race, P. (1992). Ten worries about assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 141.
94. Rahm, J., Miller, H. C., Hartley, L., & Moore, J. C. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher-scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 737-756.
95. Regis, A., Albertazzi, P. G., & Roletto, E. (1996). Concept maps in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(11), 1084-1088.
96. Resnick, D. (1982). History of educational testing. In A. K. Wigdor & W. R. Garner (Eds.), Ability testing: Uses, consequences and controversies. Part II. Documentation section (pp. 173-194). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
97. Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 37-75). Boston: Kluwer.
98. Rice, D. C., Ryan, J. M. & Samson, S. M. (1998), Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: Must different methods compete? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35(10), 1103-1127.
99. Rogoff, B. (1984). Introduction; Thinking and learning in social context. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition (pp. 1-8), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
100. Rothstein, R. (1998), Skewed comparisons. The School Administrator. 55(8), 20-24.
101. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996a). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569-600.
102. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996b). Rhetoric and reality in science performance assessment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 33(10), 1045-1063.
103. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Schultz, S. E., Li, M., & Shavelson, R. J. (2001). Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept-mapping techniques. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 260-278.
104. Sadler, P. M. (1998). Psychometric models of student conceptions in science: Reconciling qualitative studies and distractor-driven assessment instruments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35(3), 265-296.
105. Schwab, J. J. (1978). On curriculum-building. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 275-384). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
106. Selley, N. (1989). Philosophies of science and their relation to scientific processes and the science curriculum. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Skills and processes in science education (pp. 5-20). London: Routledge.
107. Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessment in science. Applied Measurement in Education. 4(4), 347-362.
108. Shepard, L. A. (1991, October). Psychometricians beliefs about learning. Educational Researcher, pp. 2-16.
109. Shepardson, D. P. (2001). Assessment in science: A guide to development and classroom practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
110. Shymansky, J. A., Chidsey, J. L., Henriquez, L., Enger, S., Yore, L. D., Wolfe, E. W., & Jorgensen, M. (1997). Performance assessment in science as a tool to enhance the picture of student learning. School Science and Mathematics. 97(4), 172-183.
111. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86-97.
112. Skinner, B. F. (1965). Reflections on a decade of teaching machines. In R. Glaser (Ed.). Teaching machines and programmed learning: II. Data and directions (pp. 5-20). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
113. Slater, T. F., Ryan, J. M., & Samson, S. L. (1997). Impact and dynamics of portfolio assessment and traditional assessment in a college physics course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(3), 255-271.
114. Stecher, B. M., Klein, S. P., Solano-Flores, G.. McCaffrey, D., Robyn, A., Shavelson, R. J.. & Haertel, E. (2000). The effects of content, format, and inquiry level on science performance assessment scores. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 139-160.
115. Strauss, S. (1972). Learning theories of Gagne and Piaget: Implications for curriculum development. Teachers College Record. 74(1), 81-102.
116. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. West & L. Pines (Eds.). Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211-231). New York: Academic Press.
117. Tumir, P. (1998). Assessment and evaluation in science education: Opportunities to learn and outcomes. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.). International handbook of science education (pp. 761-789). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
118. Tognolini, J., & Andrich, D. (1996). Analysis of profiles of students applying for entrance to universities. Applied Measurement in Education, 9(4), 323-353.
119. Tweney, R. D. (1992). Serial and parallel processing in scientific discovery. In R.N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. XV: Cognitive models of science (pp. 77-88). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
120. Villani, A. (1992). Conceptual change in science and science education. Science Education 76(2), 223-237.
121. Vygotsky, L. S. (1935/1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
122. Wandersee, J. H. (1990). Concept mapping and the cartography of cognition, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 923-936.
123. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
124. Webb, N. M., Schlackman, J., & Sugrue, B. (2000). The dependability and interchangeability of assessment methods in science. Applied Measurement in Education. 13(3), 277-301.
125. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: McMillan.
126. Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Eric Digest [WWW document]; http://ericae.net/db/edo/ED328611.htm
127. Willson, V. L. (1991). Performance assessment, psychometric theory, and cognitive learning theory: Ships crossing in the night. Contemporary Education, 62(4), 250-254.
128. Wilson, M. (2003). On choosing a model for measuring. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(3), 1-22.
129. Wineburg, S. (1997). T. S. Eliot, collaboration, and the quandaries of assessment in a rapidly changing world. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(1), 59-65.
130. Zeilik, M., Bisard, W., & Lee, K. (2002). Research-based astronomy: Will it travel? Astronomy Education Review, 1(1), 33-46.
131. Zeilik, M., Schau, C., Mattem, N., Hall, S., Teague, W., & Bisard, W. (1997). Conceptual astronomy: A novel model for teaching postsecondary science. American Journal of Physics, 65, 987-996.