Life-cycle cost analysis based on a renewal model of earthquake occurrences

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 859-880

  Takahashi, Yuji ^a   Der Kiureghian, Armen ^b   Ang, Alfredo H S ^c  

^a BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b 109 McLaughlin Hall   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Life cycle cost; Monte Carlo simulation; Oil dampers; Renewal model; Seismic risk management

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFICATION; COSTS; SEISMOLOGY; SOILS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

DAMAGE COSTS; LIFE-CYCLE COST;

EARTHQUAKES;

BUILDING; DECISION ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; SEISMIC HAZARD;

EID: 2542472668     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.383     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Reid HF. The elastic rebound theory of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Department of Geology (University of California, Berkeley, CA) 1911; 6:413-444.
2. Schwarz DP, Coppersmith KJ. Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones. Journal of Geophysical Research 1984; 89(B7):5681-5697.
3. Wesnousky SG. The Gutenberg-Richter or characteristic earthquake distribution, which is it? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1994; 84(6):1940-1959.
4. Kramer SL. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996.
5. Kiremidjian AS, Anagnos T. Stochastic slip-predictable model for earthquake occurrences. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1984; 74(2):739-755.
6. Anagnos T, Kiremidjian AS. Stochastic time-predictable model for earthquake occurrences. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1984; 74(6):2593-2611.
7. Cornell CA, Winterstein SR. Temporal and magnitude dependence in earthquake recurrence models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1988; 78(4):1522-1537.
8. Anagnos T, Kiremidjian AS. A review of earthquake occurrence models for seismic hazard analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 1988; 3(1):3-11.
9. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities. Earthquake probabilities in San Francisco Bay region: 2000 to 2030--A summary of findings. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-517, U.S. Geological Survey, 1999.
10. Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion. Evaluation Method and its Application for the Probability of Long-Term Earthquake Occurrence. http://www.jishin.go.jp/main/choukihyoka/01b/index.html, 2001 (in Japanese).
11. Matthews MV, Ellsworth WL, Reasenberg PA. A Brownian model for recurrent earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2002; 92(6):2233-2250.
12. Hasofer AM. Design for infrequent overloads. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1974; 2(4):387-388.
13. Rosenblueth E. Optimum design for infrequent disturbances. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1976; 102(9):1807-1825.
14. Applied Technology Council. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. ATC-13, Redwood City, CA, 1985.
15. Federal Emergency Management Agency. HAZUS99 Technical Manual. Washington, DC, 1999.
16. Comerio MC. The economic benefits of a disaster resistant university. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2000; Paper No. 388, Auckland, New Zealand.
17. Liu SC, Neghabat F. A cost optimization model for seismic design of structures. The Bell System Technical Journal (American Telephone and Telegraph Company, New York, NY) 1972; 51(10):2209-2225.
18. Ferritto JM. Economics of seismic design for new buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1984; 110(12):2925-2938.
19. Hwang HHM, Huo J-R. Generation of hazard-consistent fragility curves for seismic loss estimation studies. Technical Report NCEER-94-0015, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 1994.
20. Ang AH-S, De Leon D. Determination of optimal target reliabilities for design and upgrading of structures. Structural Safety 1997; 19(1):91-103.
21. Wen YK, Rang YJ. Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. 11: Applications. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2001; 127(3):338-346.
22. Liu M, Burns SA, Wen YK. Optimal seismic design of steel frame buildings based on life cycle cost considerations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:1313-1332.
23. Cornell CA, Krawinkler H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 2000; 3(2):1-3.
24. Cornell CA. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1968; 58(5):1583-1606.
25. Takahashi Y, Der Kiureghian A, Ang AH-S. Decision methodology in seismic risk management of a single building based on minimum expected life-cycle cost. UCBISEM M Report-2002/02, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2002.
26. Ang AH-S, Tang WH. Probabilistic Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Vol. 2: Decision, Risk, and Reliability. Wiley: New York, 1984.
27. Benjamin JR, Cornell CA. Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineering. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1970.
28. Ross SM. Stochastic Process. Wiley: New York, 1995.
29. Grant EL, Ireson WG, Leavenworth RS. Principles of Engineering Economy. Wiley: New York, 1990.
30. Takahashi O, Okuzono T, Yanagawa Y. Response control structure with oil damper bracing system-Vol. 2. Vibration test and long term observation. The Eighth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction 2001; Paper No. 1061, Singapore.
31. Kozo Keikaku Engineering, Inc. 2001 Annual Report. Tokyo, Japan, 2001 (in Japanese).
32. Usami T. Materials for Comprehensive Lists of Destructive Earthquakes in Japan: 416-1995, Revised and Enlarged Edition. University of Tokyo Press: Tokyo, Japan, 1996 (in Japanese).
33. Utsu T. Catalog of large earthquakes in the region of Japan from 1885 through 1980. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute (University of Tokyo) 1982; 57:401-463 (in Japanese).
34. Japan Meteorological Agency. The Seismological Bulletin of the J.M.A., 1926-1996, CD-Rom, Tokyo, Japan, 1996 (in Japanese).
35. Wesnousky SG, Scholz CH, Shimazaki K, Matsuda T. Integration of geological and seismological data for the analysis of seismic hazard: A case study of Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1984; 74(2):687-708.
36. Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM. FINSIM-a FORTRAN program for simulating stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults. Seismological Research Letters 1998; 69(1):27-32.
37. Boore DM. Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1983; 73(6):1865-1894.
38. Sato R. Theoretical basis on relationships between focal parameters and earthquake magnitude. Journal of Physics of the Earth 1979; 27:353-372.
39. Idriss IM, Sun JI. User's manual for SHAKE91: A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, 1992.
40. Sues RH, Wen YK, Ang AH-S. Stochastic evaluation of seismic structural performance. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1985; 111(6):1204-1218.